地铁荷载下不同固结度软黏土的孔压试验模型

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 2761-2768.

地铁荷载下不同固结度软黏土的孔压试验模型

魏新江^{1, 2}，张涛^{1, 2}，丁智^{1, 2}，王常晶¹，蒋吉清¹

1. 浙江大学城市学院工程分院，杭州 310015；2. 浙江大学建筑工程学院，杭州 310058

收稿日期:2013-06-27 出版日期:2014-10-11 发布日期:2014-10-27
通讯作者: 丁智，男，1983年生，博士，讲师，主要从事隧道施工对周边影响的教学和科研工作。E-mail: dingz@zucc.edu.cn E-mail:weixj@zucc.edu.cn
作者简介:魏新江，男，1965年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事城市隧道和软土地基处理方面的研究与教学工作
基金资助:
国家自然基金项目(No. 51278463)；浙江省自然基金项目(No. LQ12E08009)；杭州市科技计划项目(No. 20130533B28)。

Experimental study of pore pressure model of soft clay with different consolidation degrees under subway loading

WEI Xin-jiang^{1, 2}，ZHANG Tao^{1, 2}，DING Zhi^{1, 2}，WANG Chang-jing¹，JIANG Ji-qing¹

1. School of Engineering, City College, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310015, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Received:2013-06-27 Online:2014-10-11 Published:2014-10-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 地铁运营前下卧层土体存在不同程度固结，这会影响到运营期隧道周围土体中孔压的变化，进而产生不均匀沉降。通过GDS循环三轴试验系统对杭州饱和软黏土进行动力测试，研究了固结度、固结应力、循环应力比对孔压发展的影响。在现有研究成果的基础上建立了考虑初始固结程度的孔压模型。研究表明：循环荷载下饱和软黏土的孔压发展形态比应变发展形态更具规律性，固结程度愈高的土体孔压发展愈缓慢，并且随振动次数增加，在较低的孔压水平就可达到稳定。预测地铁长期荷载下土体的孔压和沉降时考虑孔压测试时的滞后现象会达到更好的效果，所得的孔压模型能够较好地模拟地铁运营荷载下孔压的发展。

关键词: 地铁荷载, 施工影响, 固结度, 孔压滞后, 孔压模型

Abstract: The underlying soil possesses the nature of variation in consolidation degree before subway operation, which will result in the change of pore pressure as well as the differential settlement. Hangzhou saturated soft clay is tested by dynamic triaxial test system to find the effect of consolidation degree, consolidated stress and cyclic stress ratio on the development of pore pressure. A new pore water pressure model considering the initial consolidation degree and the threshold cyclic stress ratio is proposed on the basis of existing research findings. The results show that under cyclic loadings, the development of pore pressure undergoes higher regularity than that of shear strain. The higher the consolidation degree is, the slower the pore pressure increases. Furthermore, the pore pressure will be stabilized at a lower level with the increment of cyclic times. Taking pore pressure delaying into consideration will lead to more desirable results while predicting the pore pressure and long-term settlement of the tunnel. The obtained pore pressure model can well simulate the pore pressure development under subway loadings.

Key words: subway loadings, construction influence, consolidation degree, pore pressure delaying, pore pressure model

中图分类号:

TU 442

魏新江，张涛，丁智，王常晶，蒋吉清,. 地铁荷载下不同固结度软黏土的孔压试验模型[J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2761-2768.

WEI Xin-jiang ，ZHANG Tao ，DING Zhi ，WANG Chang-jing ，JIANG Ji-qing,. Experimental study of pore pressure model of soft clay with different consolidation degrees under subway loading [J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2761-2768.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	刘忠玉，杨强. 基于分数阶Kelvin模型的饱和黏土一维流变固结分析[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3680-3687.
[2]	汪洪星，杨春和，陈锋，冒海军,. 软土抗剪强度指标随固结度变化规律分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 106-112.
[3]	许波，雷国辉，郑强，刘加才,. 考虑涂抹区压缩及渗透系数变化的堆载预压固结解[J]. , 2014, 35(6): 1607-1616.
[4]	张玉国，孙敏，谢康和,. 未打穿散体材料桩复合地基固结简化解研究[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1303-1310.
[5]	刘忠玉，李东阳. 基于加载动力效应对孔压滞后现象的一个解释[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1470-1474.
[6]	陈伟志，蒋关鲁，王智猛，李安洪,. 分级连续加载条件下原状膨胀土固结变形研究[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 710-716.
[7]	张福海，陈雷，郭帅杰，任朋勋 , . 底部抽真空预压法砂井地基固结解析解[J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2787-2793.
[8]	邹新军，杨眉，赵明华. 变荷载下考虑三维渗流的未打穿砂井地基固结分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 127-131.
[9]	王霆，罗富荣，刘维宁，李兴高. 地铁车站洞桩法施工对地层和刚性接头管线的影响[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2533-2538.
[10]	彭吉力，董江平，宋恩润，洪雷. 考虑加载过程的真空预压轴对称解析解[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 79-85.
[11]	毛宁，张尧亮. 经验公式简便求法典型实例[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2978-2982.
[12]	张勇，孔令伟，白冰，李雄威. 确定固结系数的固结速率半对数法[J]. , 2007, 28(2): 355-358.
[13]	何宁，关秉洪，娄炎，吴毅，苏辉. 保国寺旅游公路软土地基最终沉降量估算[J]. , 2006, 27(S2): 86-90.
[14]	王伟，卢廷浩，王晓妮 . 软土路基线性加载沉降曲线的研究[J]. , 2006, 27(5): 791-794.
[15]	邢皓枫，龚晓南，杨晓军，. 碎石桩加固双层地基固结简化分析[J]. , 2006, 27(10): 1739-1742.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed