›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 2769-2774.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

地应力和瓦斯压力作用下深部煤与瓦斯突出试验

唐巨鹏,杨森林,王亚林,吕家庆   

  1. 辽宁工程技术大学 力学与工程学院,辽宁 阜新 123000
  • 收稿日期:2013-07-04 出版日期:2014-10-11 发布日期:2014-10-27
  • 作者简介:唐巨鹏,男,1976年生,教授,博导,现主要从事煤与瓦斯突出机制、数值计算和试验研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展规划(973计划)项目(No. 2010CB226803);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51374119);辽宁省自然科学基金优秀人才培育项目(No. 2014020156)。

Experiment of coal and gas outbursts under ground stress and gas pressure in deep mines

TANG Ju-peng,YANG Sen-lin,WANG Ya-lin,Lü Jia-qing   

  1. School of Mechanics and Engineering Sciences, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123000, China
  • Received:2013-07-04 Online:2014-10-11 Published:2014-10-27

摘要: 基于目前煤与瓦斯突出模拟试验均为人为控制突出口打开的实际情况,自主研制了可改变轴压、围压和孔隙压,实现突出口自行打开的煤与瓦斯突出模拟仪。以典型高瓦斯矿井-阜新孙家湾矿为例,试验模拟了煤层开采深度分别为900、 1 100、1 300 m时,突出煤层临近工作面区域在地应力和瓦斯压力共同作用下诱导发生煤与瓦斯突出全过程。试验利用轴压、围压模拟地应力作用,孔隙压模拟瓦斯压力作用。经相似理论计算确定了3种开采深度下轴压和围压值、孔隙压逐级增加得到了突出时瓦斯压力,并拟合了关系曲线。研究结果表明:开采深度、轴压、围压、瓦斯压力与突出距离、突出强度间均呈幂指数增加规律。随深度增加,地应力与瓦斯压力对突出影响增量逐渐减小。瓦斯压力对突出影响作用存在3阶段特征,分别为急剧影响增加阶段、稳定影响增加阶段和缓慢影响增加阶段,确定了瓦斯压力对突出影响变化率最大值,即瓦斯压力变化异常区与稳定区分界点为0.75 MPa,对应开采深度为350 m,与前人理论分析结果基本吻合。由此可以推断,随深部开采,地应力与瓦斯压力共同作用下煤与瓦斯突出频度将增加,但强度和破坏程度增加率将趋于平缓。所得结论对该矿深部煤与瓦斯突出机制认识和预测防治具有参考意义。

关键词: 煤与瓦斯突出, 深部开采, 地应力, 瓦斯压力, 突出强度

Abstract: Based on the practical situation that the opening of outburst mouth is man-made controlled in experiments of coal and gas outbursts, the simulation device of outburst is designed and developed which can change axial pressure, confining pressure and pore pressure. The outburst mouth can open by itself. Sunjiawan coal mine in Fuxin is a typical high gassy mine as example, the whole processes of outburst induced are simulated by experiments on conditions of joint action of stress and gas pressure near working face when mining depth is respectively 900 m, 1 100 m and 1 300 m. In experiments, axial pressure and confining pressure are used to simulate ground stress. And pore pressure is used to simulate gas pressure. According to similarity theory, axial pressure and confining pressure are determined in advance on condition of 900 m, 1 100 m and 1 300 m. With the step-by-step increment of pore pressure, the gas pressure of outburst is obtained. The relationship curves are presented. The results show that the relationship curves are all power exponent among mining depth, axial pressure, confining pressure, gas pressure and outburst distance, outburst intensity. With depths increasing, the influences of stress and gas pressure on the intensity increment of gas outburst are gradually decreased. The effect of the gas pressure on outburst presents three stages characteristics, dramatic stage, steady stage and slow stage of impact increasing. The gas pressure of 0.75 MPa is the threshold influenced on maximum rate of outburst. That is also cut-off point of gas pressure between abnormal and steady region, corresponding mining depth of 350 m, which is consistent with previous theoretical results. On the basis of analysis above, it can be presented that with deep mining, the frequency of coal and gas outbursts will increase on the joint action of stress and gas pressure. But the increment of impact strength and damage will decrease. The conclusions will have reference significance to mechanism, forecasting and prevention of gas outburst for Sunjiawan coal mine.

Key words: coal and gas outbursts, deep mining, ground stress, gas pressure, outburst intensity

中图分类号: 

  • TD 262.6+5
[1] 彭守建, 郭世超, 许江, 郭臣业, 张超林, 贾立, . 采动诱导应力集中对顺层钻孔瓦斯抽采 影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 99-108.
[2] 刘波, 马永君, 盛海龙, 常雅儒, 于俊杰, 贾帅龙, . 白垩系红砂岩冻结融化后的力学性质试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 161-171.
[3] 王川婴, 王益腾, 韩增强, 汪进超, 邹先坚, 胡胜, . 基于钻孔形态分析的地应力测量方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 549-556.
[4] 陈卫忠, 田 云, 王学海, 田洪铭, 曹怀轩, 谢华东, . 基于修正[BQ]值的软岩隧道挤压变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3125-3134.
[5] 邓 珂, 陈 明, 卢文波, 严 鹏, 冷振东, . 地应力对坝肩槽预裂爆破成缝的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1121-1128.
[6] 许江, 宋肖徵, 彭守建, 张超林, 李奇贤, 张小蕾, . 顺层钻孔布置间距对煤层瓦斯抽采效果影响的 物理模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4581-4589.
[7] 崔光耀, 祁家所, 王明胜, . 片理化玄武岩隧道围岩大变形控制现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 231-237.
[8] 颜天佑,崔 臻,张勇慧,张传健,盛 谦,李建贺,. 跨活动断裂隧洞工程赋存区域地应力场分布特征研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 378-386.
[9] 马 凯,尹立明,陈军涛,陈 明,王自起,崔博强,. 深部开采底板隔水关键层受局部高承压水作用破坏理论分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3213-3222.
[10] 王庆武,巨能攀,杜玲丽,黄 健,胡 勇,. 拉林铁路桑日至加查段三维地应力场反演分析[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1450-1462.
[11] 张建海,王仁坤,周 钟,郑 路,张 茹,谢和平, . 高地应力地下厂房预应力锚索预紧系数[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1002-1008.
[12] 闫振雄,郭奇峰,王培涛, . 空心包体应变计地应力分量计算方法及应用[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 715-721.
[13] 李春元,张 勇,彭 帅,高守阳,马亚仲,. 深部开采底板岩体卸荷损伤的强扰动危险性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 3957-3968.
[14] 蒙 伟,何 川,汪 波,张钧博,吴枋胤,夏舞阳. 基于侧压力系数的岩爆区初始地应力场二次反演分析[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4191-4200.
[15] 钟 山,江 权,冯夏庭,刘继光,李邵军,邱士利,吴世勇,. 锦屏深部地下实验室初始地应力测量实践[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 356-366.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李英勇,张顶立,张宏博,宋修广. 边坡加固中预应力锚索失效机制与失效效应研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 144 -150 .
[2] 李 晶,缪林昌,钟建驰,冯兆祥. EPS颗粒混合轻质土反复荷载下变形和阻尼特性[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1769 -1775 .
[3] 梁健伟,房营光,谷任国. 极细颗粒黏土渗流的微电场效应分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3043 -3050 .
[4] 王丽艳,姜朋明,刘汉龙. 砂性地基中防波堤地震残余变形机制分析与液化度预测法[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3556 -3562 .
[5] 李秀珍,王成华,邓宏艳. DDA法和Fisher判别法在潜在滑坡判识中的应用比较[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 186 -192 .
[6] 吉武军. 黄土隧道工程问题调查分析[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 387 -390 .
[7] 陈力华 ,林 志 ,李星平. 公路隧道中系统锚杆的功效研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1843 -1848 .
[8] 陈立文,孙德安. 不同应力路径下水土耦合超固结黏土分叉分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 2922 -2928 .
[9] 郑 刚 张立明 刁 钰. 开挖条件下坑底工程桩工作性状及沉降计算分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3089 -3096 .
[10] 赵明华,雷 勇,张 锐. 岩溶区桩基冲切破坏模式及安全厚度研究[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 524 -530 .