岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 2031-2040.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1887

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    

太湖湖相黏土层剪切模量衰减特性的 原位测试研究

王斌1, 2,韩幽铭1, 3,周欣4,陈成1, 2,张先伟1, 2,桂蕾3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074;4. 江苏省交通工程建设局,江苏 南京 210004
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-18 修回日期:2021-04-30 出版日期:2021-07-12 发布日期:2021-07-19
  • 作者简介:王斌,男,1989年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程数值试验等相关工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助(No. 51709258,No. 51979270,No. 41972285);中国科学院“百人计划”资助;中国科学院青年创新促进会基金资助(No. 2018363)。

In-situ test of shear modulus decay characteristics of lacustrine clay layer in Taihu Lake

WANG Bin1, 2, HAN You-ming1, 3, ZHOU Xin4, CHEN Cheng1, 2, ZHANG Xian-wei1, 2, GUI Lei3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences(Wuhan), Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 4. Jiangsu Transportation Engineering Construction Bureau, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210004, China
  • Received:2020-12-18 Revised:2021-04-30 Online:2021-07-12 Published:2021-07-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51709258, 51979270, 41972285), the CAS Pioneer Hundred Talents Program and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2018363).

摘要: 目前围绕土体剪切模量衰减特性开展的原位测试工作比较匮乏,同时,室内试验由于需要取样、运输、制样等步骤,一定程度上会引起对样品的扰动,而准确地描述土体模量的变化特性对于场地评价以及工程设计都非常重要。为此,依托太湖隧道祉区湖相黏土,开展了最大深度为33 m的现场剑桥自钻旁压试验,获得了土体的总应力?应变曲线,并基于此分析了不同土层内土体剪切模量的衰减特性,深入探讨了不同应变下剪切模量随深度变化的分布规律,构建了剪切模量及其衰减速率与塑性指数的相关关系,结果表明:塑性指数可以作为一个可靠的指标去评价不同土体的剪切模量衰减特性。

关键词: 旁压试验, 湖相黏土, 不排水抗剪强度, 割线剪切模量, 衰减特性

Abstract: Site investigations on the decay characteristics of the soil shear modulus have so far been very limited. Meanwhile, for the laboratory experiments, which may need sampling, transportation and other procedures, soil samples are normally disturbed to some extent. However, accurate descriptions of the soil modulus are important for the site evaluations as well as the structure designs. Therefore, a series of self-boring pressuremeter based in-situ tests with a maximum depth of 33m has been carried out in the lacustrine clay of Taihu tunnel area, China. Total stress-strain curves of the different soils were obtained, and on basis of that, the shear modulus decay characteristics of the soils were analyzed in detail. Shear modulus distribution along the depth was discussed under different shear strains, where a common conclusion could be obtained for different soils is that strong degradation characteristics are shown for the small strains, and then would become stable gradually as the strain increases. A correlation law between shear modulus as well as its decay characteristics and plasticity index was established. Results show that the plasticity index can be used as a reliable index to evaluate the shear modulus decay characteristics of soils.

Key words: self-boring pressuremeter test, lacustrine clay, undrained shear strength, shear modulus, degradation characteristics

中图分类号: 

  • TU 413.9
[1] 舒荣军, 孔令伟, 师文卓, 刘炳恒, 黎澄生, . 湛江结构性黏土自钻旁压试验的加载速率效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1557-1567.
[2] 詹良通, 孙倩倩, 郭晓刚, 陈锐, 陈云敏, . 花岗岩风化料弃土快速堆填过程中 不排水抗剪强度评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 50-58.
[3] 瑜璐, 杨庆, 杨钢, 张金利. 塑性极限分析鱼雷锚锚尖贯入阻力[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1953-1962.
[4] 雷文杰, 李金雨, 云美厚, . 采动微地震波传播与衰减特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1491-1497.
[5] 邱 敏, 袁 青, 李长俊, 肖超超, . 基于孔穴扩张理论的黏土不排水抗剪强度 计算方法对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1059-1066.
[6] 周建, 蔡露, 罗凌晖, 应宏伟, . 各向异性软土基坑抗隆起稳定极限平衡分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4848-4856.
[7] 蒋水华,曾绍慧,杨建华,姚 池,黄劲松,周创兵,. 不排水抗剪强度非平稳随机场模拟及边坡可靠度分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1071-1081.
[8] 王 进,朱泽奇,陈 健,付晓东,房 强, . 海相沉积软土的自钻式旁压试验及原位力学特性[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 195-202.
[9] 刘美麟,房 倩,张顶立,侯艳娟. 深基坑内撑式支护结构综合刚度研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2059-2064.
[10] 郭小青 ,朱 斌 ,刘晋超 ,熊 根 ,黄根清 , . 珠江口海洋软土不排水抗剪强度及循环弱化特性试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1005-1012.
[11] 苏 辉,杨石飞,顾国荣. 基于旁压试验土体弹塑性本构模型初探[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 131-136.
[12] 张亚飞 ,徐光黎 ,申艳军 ,胡焕忠,. 自钻式原位剪切旁压模型不同固结荷载颗粒流数值试验[J]. , 2014, 299(2): 591-600.
[13] 曹宇春,杨建辉. 基于有效固结应力法确定结构性黏性土不排水抗剪强度[J]. , 2013, 34(11): 3085-3090.
[14] 黄文雄,杨红梅,李持庆. 利用旁压试验的砂土初始状态反演分析[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 979-985.
[15] 杨 超,汪 稔,孟庆山. 滨海沉积软土中旁压试验成果分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 275-279.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .