›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 1369-1376.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

循环冻融对冻土路基护坡块石物理力学特性的影响

林战举1,牛富俊1, 2,刘 华1,鲁嘉濠1   

  1. 1.中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所 冻土工程国家重点实验室,兰州 730000;2.中交第一公路勘察设计研究院寒区道路实验室,西安 710068
  • 收稿日期:2010-01-22 出版日期:2011-05-10 发布日期:2011-09-23
  • 作者简介:林战举,男,1976年生,博士研究生,主要从事寒区岩土工程及环境方面的研究
  • 基金资助:

    中国科学院重要方向性项目(No. KZCX2-YW-Q03-04);973计划前期研究专项(No. 2010CB434813);国家自然科学基金杰出青年基金项目(No. 40625004);创新群体项目(No. 40821001);中科院“西部之光”联合学者项目

Influences of freezing-thawing cycles on physico-mechanical properties of rocks of embankment revetments in permafrost regions

LIN Zhan-ju1, NIU Fu-jun1, 2, LIU Hua1, LU Jia-hao1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China; 2. Cold Regions Road Engineering Laboratory, First Highway Design and Research Institute, Xi’an 710068, China
  • Received:2010-01-22 Online:2011-05-10 Published:2011-09-23

摘要: 选用铺设于青藏铁路护坡、护道的碎屑岩、泥岩和砂岩3种岩石进行循环冻融试验。研究了在循环冻融条件下的破坏方式,并通过RSM-SY5数字声波仪对岩石进行超声波无损检测;根据不同冻融周期超声波波速变化,计算分析了循环冻融对岩石物理力学特性的影响;通过单轴压缩试验,得到岩石抗压强度随循环冻融次数变化的规律。研究结果表明:3种岩石在循环冻融条件下具有不同的表观破坏方式,碎屑岩破坏最严重,表面不同程度地出现了轴向和环向裂纹;其次是泥岩,一条近似“几”字型的裂纹出现在泥岩表面,且裂纹发展较快;砂岩表观破坏最轻微,仅有1条细而短的裂隙发育在表面;在30个循环冻融周期内,泥岩和砂岩几乎无质量变化,而碎屑岩由于岩屑掉落而质量减轻不到1%;3种岩石的弹性模量、刚性模量、体积模量、泊松比等力学特性随着循环冻融次数增加而下降,且泊松比出现负值,揭示了循环冻融对岩石材料特性的深层次破坏;岩石抗压强度也随着循环冻融周期呈现下降趋势

关键词: 循环冻融, 超声波, 岩石, 物理力学特性

Abstract: Under the freezing-thawing cycles, three types of rocks (clastic-rock, mudstone, and sandstone) chosen from the protecting-slope and berm of the Qinghai-Tibet Railway were studied. Their failure processes and weight were observed. The results show that the severe longitudinal and circumferential cracks appeared on the outside of the clastic-rock specimen; and that the debris shedding caused the weight changes less than 1% during the period of 30 freezing-thawing cycles. In the crack growth process of mudstone specimen, a horizontal, circumferential crack initialized almost parallel to the bottom of the cylinder; the growth of the crack tip then tilted gradually toward the bottom to a degree such that the direction of the crack was almost perpendicular to the axel of the cylinder. Such tilt did not appear in the sandstone specimen, in which only a short-slim circumferential crack grew outside. However, both rocks had no reduction in weight because no debris was shed. Their ultrasonic velocity testing was made by the digital acoustic-waves-monitor (RSM-SY5). According to the changes of the ultrasonic velocity at different freezing-thawing cycles, elastic modulus, rigidity modulus, bulk modulus, and Poisson's ratio of the three types of rocks were calculated and analyzed. The results show that the ultrasonic velocity, three moluli and Poisson's ratios all decrease with the increase of the freezing-thawing cycles, especially the Poisson's ratios begin to be negative values after the tenth freezing-thawing cycle, disclosing the severe failures inside of the rocks. At last, by the uniaxial compression tests of the three types of rocks subjected to different cycles of freezing and thawing, of which the compressive strengths gradually decrease with the increase of the freezing and thawing cycles.

Key words: freezing-thawing cycles, ultrasonic velocity, rock, physico-mechanical properties

中图分类号: 

  • TU 45
[1] 张艳博, 孙林, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 刘祥鑫, . 花岗岩破裂过程声发射关键信号时 频特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 157-165.
[2] 宋勇军, 杨慧敏, 张磊涛, 任建喜. 冻结红砂岩单轴损伤破坏CT实时试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 152-160.
[3] 刘希灵, 刘周, 李夕兵, 韩梦思. 单轴压缩与劈裂荷载下灰岩声发射b值特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 267-274.
[4] 许婧璟, 唐旭海, 刘泉声, 冯禹菲. 基于能量跟踪法研究岩石破碎 对滚石运动轨迹的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 541-548.
[5] 张国凯, 李海波, 王明洋, 李晓锋, . 基于声学测试和摄像技术的单裂隙岩石 裂纹扩展特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 63-72.
[6] 赵国彦, 李振阳, 吴浩, 王恩杰, 刘雷磊. 含非贯通裂隙砂岩的动力破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 73-81.
[7] 陈炳瑞, 吴昊, 池秀文, 刘辉, 伍梦蝶, 晏俊伟, . 基于STA/LTA岩石破裂微震信号实时识 别算法及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3689-3696.
[8] 大久保诚介, 汤 杨, 许江, 彭守建, 陈灿灿, 严召松, . 3D-DIC系统在岩石力学试验中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3263-3273.
[9] 宋义敏, 邓琳琳, 吕祥锋, 许海亮, 赵泽鑫, . 岩石摩擦滑动变形演化及声发射特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2899-2906.
[10] 张艳博, 梁鹏, 孙林, 田宝柱, 姚旭龙, 刘祥鑫, . 单轴压缩下饱水花岗岩破裂过程声发射 频谱特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2497-2506.
[11] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 多孔隙岩石加卸载力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2673-2685.
[12] 周辉, 陈珺, 张传庆, 朱勇, 卢景景, 姜玥, . 低强高脆岩爆模型材料配比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2039-2049.
[13] 田军, 卢高明, 冯夏庭, 李元辉, 张希巍. 主要造岩矿物微波敏感性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2066-2074.
[14] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于应变软化指标的岩石非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2239-2246.
[15] 吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及 破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 谭贤君,陈卫忠,杨建平,杨春和. 盐岩储气库温度-渗流-应力-损伤耦合模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3633 -3641 .
[2] 魏 星,王 刚,余志灵. 交通荷载下软土地基长期沉降的有限元法[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 2011 -2015 .
[3] 温世亿,李静,苏霞,姚雄. 复杂应力条件下围岩破坏的细观特征研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2399 -2406 .
[4] 毛 宁,张尧亮. 经验公式简便求法典型实例[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2978 -2982 .
[5] 余天堂. 模拟三维裂纹问题的扩展有限元法[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3280 -3285 .
[6] 刘 杰,李建林,屈建军,陈 星,李剑武,骆世威. 基于卸荷岩体力学的大岗山坝肩边坡水平位移发育的多因素影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3619 -3626 .
[7] 李伟华,赵成刚,杜楠馨. 软弱饱和土夹层对地铁车站地震响应的影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3958 -3963 .
[8] 韩现民. 西格二线关角隧道浅埋砂层段施工技术及力学效应研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 297 -302 .
[9] 蒋臻蔚,彭建兵,王启耀. 西安市地铁3号线不良地质问题及对策研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 317 -321 .
[10] 刘用海,朱向荣,常林越. 基于Casagrande法数学分析确定先期固结压力[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 211 -214 .