›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 2877-2888.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

非饱和花岗岩残积土粒间联结作用与脆弹塑性胶结损伤模型研究

汤连生1, 5,桑海涛2, 5,宋 晶1,刘锋涛1,颜 波3,张鹏程4   

  1. 1.中山大学 地球科学系,广州 510275;2.中山大学 工学院,广州 510275;3.广东省建筑科学研究院,广州 510500; 4.广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院,广州 510060;5.广东省地质过程与矿产资源探查重点实验室,广州 510275
  • 收稿日期:2013-04-17 出版日期:2013-10-09 发布日期:2013-10-18
  • 作者简介:汤连生,男,1963年生,博士,博导,教授,主要从事地质工程、岩土力学、岩土化学力学教研工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 40872205);全国高等学校博士学科专项科研基金资助项目(No. 20120171110031);广东省自然科学基金项目(No. 07003738,No. S2012040007331);广东省科技计划项目(No. 2008B030303009)

Research on soil particle joint function and brittle-elastoplastic cement damage model of unsaturated granite residual soil

TANG Lian-sheng1, 5, SANG Hai-tao2, 5, SONG Jing1, LIU Feng-tao1, YAN Bo3, ZHANG Peng-cheng4   

  1. 1. Department of Earth Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China; 2. School of Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China; 3. Architecture Science Academy of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510550, China; 4. Guangzhou Urban Planning Survey and Design Institute, Guangzhou 510060, China; 5. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Guangzhou 510275, China
  • Received:2013-04-17 Online:2013-10-09 Published:2013-10-18

摘要: 非饱和花岗岩残积土主要为铁质胶结,遇水后强度急剧降低,结构性强,显示出脆弹塑性损伤破坏特点,其粒间联结作用正是其结构性和脆弹塑性损伤破坏的核心问题。论述了非饱和土的粒间联结作用,将其分为接触联结和非接触联结两类,这两种联结在粒间相互作用上都表现为吸力的作用,即由湿吸力、可变结构吸力组成的粒间吸力。非饱和花岗岩残积土铁质胶结为主的接触联结作用,加上其砂粒、黏粒等各级粒度成分混合,致使粒间联结作用遇水或扰动后变化大,导致力学性质上的脆性显著。通过理论推导,给出了可变结构吸力与土体堆积方式、干密度、孔隙比、含水率/饱和度的定量计算公式,并由试验验证了计算公式的合理性。进而从游离氧化铁胶结是非饱和花岗岩风化残积土显示脆弹塑性的根本原因出发,基于堆砌体模型思想,采用孔隙比与结构脆性参数构建损伤过程函数,建立了可反映非饱和花岗岩残积土脆弹塑性胶结损伤的理论模型,通过试验验证表明,所建模型能很好地反映非饱和花岗岩残积土特有的应力-应变关系,从理论上较好地解释了花岗岩残积土遇水或扰动后易破坏的机制。

关键词: 非饱和, 花岗岩残积土, 粒间联结作用, 脆弹塑性, 损伤

Abstract: Unsaturated granite residual soil is mainly ferruginous cement, its strength decreases sharply in water, structural significant, showing brittle-elastoplastic damage characteristics, whose soil particle joint function is the core problem of structure and brittle- elastoplastic damage. The unsaturated soil particle joint function is discussed; it is divided into contact and non-contact joints, and these two kinds of joints are expressed as suction effects in soil particle intergranular interactions, that is the suction between grains composed of variable structure suction and wet suction. For unsaturated granite residual soil, particle joint function should be paid more attention. Unsaturated granite residual soil’s contact joint is dominated by ferruginous cementation and all levels of granularity composition mixtures as sand, clay and so on; they cause the suction between grains changing greatly in water or disturbance, resulting in the properties of the brittleness in the mechanics of unsaturated granite residual soil. Then through theoretical derivation, by referencing coordination number, the Smith formula, and the Fisher formula in mineralogy, crystal powder mechanics and engineering, quantitative calculation formula of variable structure suction and the soil accumulation mode, dry density, void ratio, water / saturation are given; and the rationality of the calculation formula is verified by tests. Then we research and realize that free iron oxide cement is the fundamental point of granite residual soil’s property of brittle-elastoplasticity, so a masonry model is used; and then void ratio and structure parameter are applied to construct the brittle damage process function; a theory model which can reflect the damage of unsaturated granite residual soil elastoplasticity is established. Through the comparison of calculation and experiment results. The results show that the model established above can well reflect the unique stress-strain relationship of unsaturated granite residual soil. It can explain well the mechanism of unsaturated granite residual soil which is easily destroyed in water or disturbance according to theory.

Key words: unsaturation, granite residual soil, soil particle joint function, brittle elastoplasticity, damage

中图分类号: 

  • TU 45
[1] 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 热−水−力耦合条件下黏土岩蠕变特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 379-388.
[2] 程涛, 晏克勤, 胡仁杰, 郑俊杰, 张欢, 陈合龙, 江志杰, 刘强, . 非饱和土拟二维平面应变固结问题的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 453-460.
[3] 方瑾瑾, 冯以鑫, 王立平, 余永强, . 真三轴条件下非饱和黄土的有效应力屈服特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 492-500.
[4] 张峰瑞, 姜谙男, 杨秀荣, 申发义. 冻融循环下花岗岩剪切蠕变试验与模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 509-519.
[5] 邓子千, 陈嘉帅, 王建伟, 刘小文, . 基于SFG模型的统一屈服面本构模型与试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 527-534.
[6] 李潇旋, 李涛, 彭丽云, . 控制吸力循环荷载下非饱和黏性土 的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 552-560.
[7] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 刘抗, 王彦臻, . 饱和珊瑚砂最大动剪切模量的 循环加载衰退特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 601-611.
[8] 程昊, 唐辉明, 吴琼, 雷国平. 一种考虑水力滞回效应的非饱和土弹塑性扩展 剑桥本构模型显式算法有限元实现[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 676-686.
[9] 李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[10] 宋勇军, 杨慧敏, 张磊涛, 任建喜. 冻结红砂岩单轴损伤破坏CT实时试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 152-160.
[11] 范运辉, 朱其志, 倪涛, 张坤, 张振南, . 基于弹性张量离散化的脆延转变本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 181-188.
[12] 刘丽, 吴羊, 陈立宏, 刘建坤, . 基于数值模拟的湿润锋前进法测量精度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 341-349.
[13] 丑亚玲, 黄守洋, 孙丽源, 王莉杰, 岳国栋, 曹伟, 盛煜, . 基于冻融作用的氯盐渍土−钢块界面力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 41-52.
[14] 李杰林, 朱龙胤, 周科平, 刘汉文, 曹善鹏, . 冻融作用下砂岩孔隙结构损伤特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3524-3532.
[15] 张超, 杨期君, 曹文贵. 考虑峰值后区应力跌落速率的 脆岩损伤本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3099-3106.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 殷 杰,高玉峰,洪振舜. 连云港软黏土的不排水强度试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3297 -3301 .
[2] 陈绍杰,郭惟嘉,杨永杰. 煤岩蠕变模型与破坏特征试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2595 -2598 .
[3] 林刚,徐长节,蔡袁强. 不平衡堆载作用下深基坑开挖支护结构性状研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2592 -2598 .
[4] 穆彦虎,马 巍,孙志忠,刘永智. 青藏铁路块石路基冷却降温效果对比分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 284 -292 .
[5] 刘小丽,张丹丹,刘 凯,苏媛媛. 一种直剪式模型试验设备的设计及应用[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 475 -480 .
[6] 康永君,杨 军,宋二祥. 地震作用下边坡安全系数时程计算及参数研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 261 -268 .
[7] 卢坤林,杨 扬. 考虑位移影响的主动土压力近似计算方法[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 553 -557 .
[8] 肖成志,孙建诚,李雨润,刘晓朋. 三维土工网垫植草护坡防坡面径流冲刷的机制分析[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 453 -458 .
[9] 苏立君,廖红建,殷建华. 土钉抗拔试验过程中钉周土体应力变化研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 124 -128 .
[10] 张亚民,马凤山,徐嘉谟,赵海军. 高应力区露天转地下开采岩体移动规律[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 590 -0595 .