热力隧道下穿地面建筑物的安全评价与对策

›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 112-116.

热力隧道下穿地面建筑物的安全评价与对策

姚海波¹，王梦恕¹，张顶立¹，孔恒²

1.北京交通大学隧道研究中心，北京 100044；2.北京市政工程总公司，北京 100045

收稿日期:2004-08-09 出版日期:2006-01-10 发布日期:2013-10-31
作者简介:姚海波，男，1971年出生，博士生，隧道工程专业，主要从事隧道工程与工程环境关系问题研究。

Security aspect and measurements while tunneling of the thermal power tunnel from below buildings on ground surface

YAO Hai-bo¹, WANG Meng-shu¹, ZHANG Ding-li¹, KONG heng²

1.Research Center of Tunneling and Underground Works, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2.Beijing Municipal Engineering Corporation, Beijing 100045, China

Received:2004-08-09 Online:2006-01-10 Published:2013-10-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在北京市北三环路和平东桥－太阳宫西路段热力管线工程中，依据设计热力隧道要下穿一处面积为23.4 m× 24.5 m的地表一层砖砌群房。由于隧道埋藏浅，且所处于富水粉质粘土之中，其抗扰动能力很差，常规的施工降水对强化土体效果甚微，经评价认为，普通的施工方法必然会造成很大的地表沉降而危及地表房屋安全，同时，由于土体自稳能力极低，对施工亦存在很大的安全隐患。基于此，选定在不降水的条件下，采用水平长管棚支护技术和在隧道上半断面注浆技术，实现阻水、固土、均一沉降的目的，其有效地控制了土体沉降，保证了隧道安全贯通和地表建筑的安全使用。

关键词: 安全, 热力隧道, 穿越, 长管棚, 注浆

Abstract: During construction of Hepingdong Bridge – Sun Palace thermal power pipeline in Northern third loop road of Beijing City, the pipeline tunnel would go through beneath a couple of single-floor houses, whose area is 23.4 m×24.5 m. Due to the shallow overburden and the saturated microfine sandy clay, which is plastic and soft plastic, the strata is very weak in resisting interruption. The traditional dewatering is limited to improve the nature of the strata. Based on calculation, it is believed that the common construction method would necessarily cause much settlement and endanger the houses. Meanwhile, as the strata are hard to stand up, safety problems may be triggered in construction. In view of these, the level long steel pipes are adopted to support soil mass and grouting in the upper half face of the tunnel is operated to prevent ground water and strengthen soil without dewatering. These two methods effectively control the settlement of ground surface and ensure the perforation of the tunnel in time and running of the houses in security.

Key words: security, thermal power tunnel, going through, long steel pipe, grouting

中图分类号:

X 124

姚海波，王梦恕，张顶立，孔恒 . 热力隧道下穿地面建筑物的安全评价与对策[J]. , 2006, 27(1): 112-116.

YAO Hai-bo , WANG Meng-shu , ZHANG Ding-li , KONG heng . Security aspect and measurements while tunneling of the thermal power tunnel from below buildings on ground surface[J]. , 2006, 27(1): 112-116.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[2]	杨杰, 马春辉, 程琳, 吕高, 李斌, . 高陡边坡变形及其对坝体安全稳定影响研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2341-2353.
[3]	吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[4]	张聪, 梁经纬, 阳军生, 曹磊, 谢亦朋, 张贵金, . 堤坝脉动注浆浆液扩散机制及应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1507-1514.
[5]	魏久传, 韩承豪, 张伟杰, 谢超, 张连震, 李孝朋, 张春瑞, 蒋记港, . 基于步进式算法的裂隙注浆扩散机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 913-925.
[6]	程桦, 彭世龙, 荣传新, 孙泽辉, . 千米深井L型钻孔预注浆加固硐室围岩数值模拟及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 274-284.
[7]	尹小涛，薛海斌，汤华，任兴文，宋罡,. 边坡局部和整体稳定性评价方法的辩证统一[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 98-104.
[8]	乐慧琳，孙少锐. 注浆材料和预制裂纹缺陷角度对类岩石试件单轴抗压强度及破坏模式的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 211-219.
[9]	宗钟凌，鲁先龙，李青松，. 静压钢管注浆微型桩抗压与抗拔对比试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 362-368.
[10]	尹小涛，严飞，秦雨樵，周磊，王东英, . 地震作用下华丽高速公路金沙江桥华坪岸顺层边坡动力稳定性评价[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 387-394.
[11]	李小飞，孙江涛，陈卫忠，袁敬强，刘金泉，张庆艳,. 纤维硅灰水泥石强度与浆液抗冲刷特性[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3157-3163.
[12]	张聪，梁经纬，张箭，阳军生，张贵金，叶新田,. 基于脉动注浆的宾汉流体渗透扩散机制研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2740-2746.
[13]	肖国峰，陈从新. 岩质块体渐进破坏的稳定分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3001-3010.
[14]	许明，唐亚锋，刘先珊，罗斌，唐道勇，. 自适应锚索锚固岩质边坡地震动力响应分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2379-2386.
[15]	李清川，李术才，王汉鹏，张红军，张冰，张玉强,. 上覆流沙层隧道开挖面稳定性分析与数值试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2681-2690.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed