复合加载下软基上半圆堤结构稳定性分析

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 789-794.

复合加载下软基上半圆堤结构稳定性分析

肖忠^{1, 2}，王元战^{1, 2}，及春宁^{1, 2}

1. 天津大学水利工程仿真与安全国家重点实验室，天津 300072；2. 天津大学天津市港口与海洋工程重点实验室，天津 300072

收稿日期:2013-02-27 出版日期:2014-03-10 发布日期:2014-03-19
通讯作者: 及春宁，男，1978年，博士，副教授，主要从事港口海岸及近海工程、计算流体力学研究。E-mail: jichunning@126.com E-mail:tjuzhongxiao@tju.edu.cn
作者简介:肖忠，男，1983年，博士，讲师，主要从事港口海岸及近海工程结构设计理论和方法、土与结构相互作用研究
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No.51109157）；国家自然科学基金创新研究群体科学基金项目（No.51021004）；天津市应用基础与前沿技术研究计划项目（No.12JCQNJC04900）；高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目（No.20110032120049）；大连理工大学海岸和近海工程国家重点实验室开放基金项目(No.LP1106)。

Stability analysis of semi-circular breakwater on soft foundation under combined loading

XIAO Zhong^{1, 2}, WANG Yuan-zhan^{1, 2}, JI Chun-ning^{1, 2}

1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 2. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Harbor and Ocean Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Received:2013-02-27 Online:2014-03-10 Published:2014-03-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 半圆堤是适用于软土地基的一种轻型重力式的新型防波堤结构，复合加载模式下软基上半圆堤的稳定性计算和结构破坏模式尚需建立合理的分析和计算方法。将加载模式与软基上大型海岸结构稳定性分析的有限元模拟方法相结合，同时考虑半圆堤在不同荷载组合时可能发生沿底板或抛石基床底部的滑动破坏及地基竖向承载力破坏，建立了复合加载模式下软基上半圆堤的稳定性分析方法，得出了结构的稳定性破坏模式和破坏包络线（面），并分析了箱内填砂量、抛石基床宽度及地基加固深度对半圆堤稳定性的影响。计算结果表明：半圆堤结构在复合荷载作用的破坏包络线（面）均由一定区域的结构滑移破坏面和地基承载力破坏线（面）组成，并将整个荷载组合区分成4个区域：稳定区、只发生滑移破坏区、只发生地基承载力破坏区和同时发生滑移和地基承载力破坏区；荷载与位移组合加载模式得到的地基承载力破坏包络线位于Swipe加载方式得到的破坏包络线之外，但对每种加载方式得到的地基承载力破坏包络线变化趋势基本一致；随着箱内填砂高度的增加沿沉箱底部和抛石基床底部的抗滑安全系数均增加，但地基承载力安全系数减小；随着抛石基床宽度或地基加固深度的增加，地基承载力安全系数明显增大。

关键词: 半圆堤, 软土地基, 复合加载, 稳定性, 有限元法, 破坏模式

Abstract: The semi-circular breakwater is a new light gravity type of structure suitable for soft foundation. It is necessary to establish a reasonable calculation and analysis method for stability and failure mode of the semi-circular breakwater under combined loads. Stability analysis method of the semi-circular breakwater under combined loads is developed by combining load mode with finite element method of the large coastal structures on soft foundation. Meanwhile, sliding failure along the bottom of the base plate and rubble-mound foundation, and vertical bearing capacity failure of the soil foundation are considered. Furthermore, stability failure mode and failure envelopes of structural bearing capacity are obtained. Finally, the effects of amount of filling sand in caisson, the width of rubble-mound foundation, and the reinforcement depth of soil foundation on stability of the semi-circular breakwater are analyzed. The calculating results show that the sliding surface and foundation bearing capacity failure lines of the semi-circular breakwater under combined loading divide the whole V-H loads space into four regions, namely stable region, slide-only failure region, region where only foundation bearing capacity failure happens and region where both sliding failure and foundation bearing capacity failure happen. The foundation bearing capacity failure line obtained by load and displacement composite load mode is outside the failure line obtained by Swipe load mode. But for each load mode, change trends of foundation bearing capacity failure lines are almost consistent. It can be seen that safety factors of stability against sliding along the bottom of caisson or rubble-mound foundation both increase with the height of filling sand in caisson, but safety factors of foundation bearing capacity decrease. Meanwhile, safety factors of foundation bearing capacity obviously increase with the increase of width of rubble-mound foundation or reinforcement depth of foundation.

Key words: semi-circular breakwater, soft foundation, combined loading, stability, finite element method, failure mode

中图分类号:

U 656.3

肖忠，王元战，及春宁 , . 复合加载下软基上半圆堤结构稳定性分析[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 789-794.

XIAO Zhong , WANG Yuan-zhan , JI Chun-ning , . Stability analysis of semi-circular breakwater on soft foundation under combined loading[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 789-794.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	朱彦鹏, 陶钧, 杨校辉, 彭俊国, 吴强, . 框架预应力锚托板结构加固高填方边坡设计与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
[2]	孙锐, 杨峰, 阳军生, 赵乙丁, 郑响凑, 罗静静, 姚捷, . 基于二阶锥规划与高阶单元的自适应上限有限元研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 687-694.
[3]	苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[4]	王培涛, 黄正均, 任奋华, 章亮, 蔡美峰, . 基于3D打印的含复杂节理岩石直剪特性及破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 46-56.
[5]	戴国亮, 朱文波, 郭晶, 龚维明, 赵学亮, . 软黏土中吸力式沉箱基础竖向抗拔承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[6]	刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[7]	王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[8]	聂秀鹏, 逄焕平, 孙志彬, 谢松梅, 侯超群. 三维加筋边坡地震稳定性上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3483-3492.
[9]	朱才辉, 崔晨, 兰开江, 东永强. 砖-土结构劣化及入侵建筑物拆除对榆林卫城稳定性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3153-3166.
[10]	陈冲, 王卫, 吕华永, . 基于复合抗滑桩模型加固边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3207-3217.
[11]	陈建功, 李会, 贺自勇, . 基于变分法的均质土坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2931-2937.
[12]	刘新荣, 邓志云, 刘永权, 刘树林, 路雨明, . 地震作用下水平层状岩质边坡累积损伤与破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2507-2516.
[13]	曹洪, 胡瑶, 骆冠勇. 滤管两端均不在含水层层面的承压不完整井近似计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2774-2780.
[14]	蒋泽锋, 张戈, 朱大勇, 王军, . 锚固力作用下的边坡临界滑动场法研究与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2799-2806.
[15]	王宏磊, 孙志忠, 刘永智, 武贵龙, . 青藏铁路含融化夹层路基热力响应监测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2815-2824.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed