›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (S2): 553-557.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

新疆河道特征及洪水灾害治理研究

李 山1,杨建明2,郭 新3   

  1. 1.新疆水利厅规划设计管理局,乌鲁木齐 830000; 2. 新疆塔城地区水利水电设计院,塔城 830000;3.新疆水文水资源局 乌鲁木齐 830000
  • 收稿日期:2006-11-21 发布日期:2006-12-16
  • 作者简介:李山,男,1957年生,教授级高工。从事河床演变、河道治理及泥沙处理研究。

A study of river course characters and flood regulation in Xinjiang

LI Shan1, YANG Jian-ming2,GUO Xing3   

  1. 1. Administration Bureau of Planning and Designing, Xinjiang Water Resources Bureau, Urumqi, 830000 China 2. Tacheng District Design Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower, Xinjiang, Tacheng; 830000 China 3. The hydrology and Water Resources Bureau of Xingjiang, Urumqi, 830000 China
  • Received:2006-11-21 Published:2006-12-16

摘要: 新疆河流洪水具有陡涨陡落、泥砂含量高、突发性强等特点。冲积扇河道纵坡大,上、中游河道表现为冲刷或冲淤基本平衡,河道防护工程洪水期冲刷问题突出。河流中下游纵坡明显减缓,河道加宽变浅,频繁摆动游荡。河流纵向、横向输沙不平衡引起河势改变,引起河道冲刷崩岸及洪水灾害。通过对新疆河流、河道特征,水力学要素及河床演变、河道冲淤规律分析,根据新疆河道特点及防洪实践,提出了河道治理思路及防护工程布置方法,对不同河段防护工程设计参数的选取、河道整治建筑物的结构型式等问题进行了探讨。

Abstract: Floods in Xinjiang are characterized by steep rising and falling, high content of silt, sudden strong flood etc. Alluvial river bed has a bigger profile grade while keeping balance of scouring and aggregation in the upstream and in the middle stream. The problem of scouring to flood control works is obvious during flooding periods. Profile grade in the middle stream and downstream become small while rivers bed frequent swings and shifts. Unbalanced sand moving from longitudinal section and cross section have caused river situation to be changed, river bed to scoure, thus resulting in outburst of river banks and flood disease. By analyzing the characteristics of rivers and river bed in Xinjiang, hydrologic factors, river bed development, river scouring and aggravation based on the characteristics of rivers in Xinjiang and local flood control practice, the paper provides approach of river treatment and layout methods of flood control works and discusses selection of designing factors of different parts of flood control works, structure types of flood control buildings.

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 程星磊,王建华,王哲学,. 软黏土中吸力锚循环失稳过程的模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3285-3293.
[2] 李 宣, 孙德安,张俊然,. 吸力历史对非饱和粉土动力变形特性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2829-2836.
[3] 曾志雄,孔令伟,李晶晶,李聚昭, . 干湿-冻融循环下延吉膨胀岩的力学特性及其应力-应变归一化[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2895-2904.
[4] 李建民,滕延京. 基于载荷试验的土体回弹再压缩变形规律及计算方法[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 113-121.
[5] 董金玉,王 闯,周建军,杨继红,李严威,. 泡沫改良砂卵石土的试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 140-148.
[6] 孙逸飞,沈 扬,刘汉龙,. 粗粒土的分数阶应变率及其与分形维度的关系[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 297-302.
[7] 胡东旭,李 贤,周超云,薛 乐,刘洪伏,汪时机. 膨胀土干湿循环胀缩裂隙的定量分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 318-324.
[8] 闫澍旺,李 嘉,闫 玥,陈 浩,. 黏性土地基中竖向圆孔的极限稳定深度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1176-1181.
[9] 孙德安,张乾越,张 龙,朱赞成,. 高庙子膨润土强度时效性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1191-1196.
[10] 杨明辉,冯超博,赵明华,罗 宏. 考虑坡度效应的水平受荷桩应变楔计算方法[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1271-1280.
[11] 毛 新,汪时机, 程明书,陈正汉,王晓琪,. 膨胀土初始破损与湿干交替耦合作用下的力学行为[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 571-579.
[12] 苗发盛,吴益平,谢媛华,李曜男,李麟玮. 水位升降条件下牵引式滑坡离心模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 605-613.
[13] 陈祖煜,黎康平,李 旭,詹成明,. 重力式挡土墙抗滑稳定容许安全系数取值标准初探[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 1-10.
[14] 陈祥胜,李银平,尹洪武,葛鑫博,施锡林,杨春和, . 多夹层盐矿地下储气库气体渗漏评价方法[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 11-20.
[15] 朱 勇,冯夏庭,周 辉,张传庆,张铭强,. 抗剪强度分项系数的标准差反馈标定法[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 151-157.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 周小平,刘庆义. 岩石声发射混沌特征分析[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 815 -820 .
[2] 刘东燕,郑志明,侯 龙. 边坡模型边界效应及材料孔隙率敏感性研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 23 -27 .
[3] 刘彩平,鞠 杨,段庆全. 岩石材料内部特征尺度对裂纹扩展机制的影响[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 91 -95 .
[4] 和礼红,李 艳,张妮娜,秦亚琼. 钉形水泥土双向搅拌桩桩身强度差异原因分析与检测探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 255 -260 .
[5] 张忠苗,张乾青,贺静漪,俞 峰,刘俊伟. 浙江某高层预应力管桩偏位和上浮处理实例分析[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2919 -2924 .
[6] 刘明贵,刘绍波,张国华. GPU通用计算模式在岩土工程中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 3019 -3024 .
[7] 刘中新,朱慧丽,陈正洪. 京九铁路江淮段降水型路基坍塌的地质、降水条件分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3254 -3259 .
[8] 陈 峰,田利勇,卢伟华. 盾构隧道穿越苏州河对防汛墙的影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3855 -3860 .
[9] 王立峰,黄洪勉. 纳米硅水泥土弹塑性有限元分析[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 143 -146 .
[10] 高树生,钱根宝,王 彬,杨作明,刘华勋. 新疆火山岩双重介质气藏供排气机理数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 276 -280 .