不同地连墙插入深度下承压含水层减压降水对既有隧道的影响

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (S2): 412-421.

不同地连墙插入深度下承压含水层减压降水对既有隧道的影响

郑刚^{1, 2}，王琦^{1, 2}，邓旭³，刘庆晨³

1.天津大学滨海土木工程结构与安全教育部重点实验室，天津 300072； 2.天津大学建筑工程学院，天津 300072；3.天津市建筑设计院，天津 300074

收稿日期:2014-01-04 出版日期:2014-10-31 发布日期:2014-11-12
作者简介:郑刚，男，1967年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事土力学及岩土工程方面的教学与科研工作。
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划（973计划）资助项目（No. 2010CB732106）；天津市科技计划资助项目（No. 11ZCGYSF00800）。

Influence of pressure-relief of confined aquifer on existing tunnel under conditions of different inserted lengths of diaphragm wall

ZHENG Gang^{1, 2}, WANG Qi^{1, 2}, DENG Xu³, LIU Qing-chen³

1. Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 3. Tianjin Architecture Design Institute, Tianjin 300074, China

Received:2014-01-04 Online:2014-10-31 Published:2014-11-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 当基坑需进行未截断条件下的承压含水层降水时，承压水抽降产生的影响范围远大于基坑开挖的影响范围，其对基坑外既有隧道的影响值得重视。进行了承压层减压降水对既有盾构隧道影响的有限元仿真模拟，并分析了采用地下连续墙插入承压含水层时，不同插入深度对隧道变形的影响，结果表明：随着地下连续墙插入承压含水层深度的增加，直至完全截断承压含水层，既有隧道沉降逐渐减小，但受地下连续墙变形的影响，隧道在水平方向仍存在较大位移。因此，当既有隧道与减压井净距较小时，即使承压含水层被完全截断，也应重视减压降水对隧道水平方向变形造成的影响。此外，长期减压降水将会引起隧道产生可观的沉降。因此，应尽量避免承压含水层未被完全截断条件下进行长期减压降水。

关键词: 承压含水层, 地下连续墙, 既有隧道, 减压降水

Abstract: If the confined aquifer is not completely cut off by the diaphragm wall during the pressure-relief process which is used for preventing the heave failure of deep excavation, the sphere of influence of ground settlement caused by pressure-relief of confined aquifer is much larger than that caused by the excavation. Therefore, the deformation characteristics of the existing shield tunnels caused by pressure-relief of confined aquifer are simulated by finite element method; and then the diaphragm wall is inserted into the confined aquifer, the effect of the length of diaphragm wall into the confined aquifer on the deformation of tunnel is analyzed. The results show that, as the length of diaphragm wall inserted into the confined aquifer increases, the settlement of tunnel decreases. But because of the deformation of wall, horizontal movement of the tunnel is considerable during the pressure-relief process. So it should be pointed out that when the tunnel is close to the dewatering well, even there is a diaphragm wall cutting off the confined aquifer, the influence of dewatering on the horizontal deformation should be paid attention to. Besides, the long-term pressure-relief process will cause severe settlement of the tunnel; so it should be avoided when the confined aquifer is not completely cut off.

Key words: confined aquifer, diaphragm wall, existing tunnel, pressure-relief of confined aquifer for dewatering

中图分类号:

TU 921

郑刚，王琦，邓旭，刘庆晨，. 不同地连墙插入深度下承压含水层减压降水对既有隧道的影响[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 412-421.

ZHENG Gang , WANG Qi , DENG Xu , LIU Qing-chen，. Influence of pressure-relief of confined aquifer on existing tunnel under conditions of different inserted lengths of diaphragm wall[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 412-421.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	郭帅杰, 宋绪国, . 基于沉桩模拟试验的装配式地下连续墙沉桩阻力评估方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 269-274.
[2]	吴昌将, 孙召花, 赖允瑾, 包华, . 软土地区地下连续墙深大基坑的变形性状研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 245-253.
[3]	梁荣柱，夏唐代，胡军华，罗岚, . 新建隧道近距离上穿对既有地铁隧道纵向变形影响分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 391-399.
[4]	汤永净，赵锡宏,. 软土地基超高层建筑补偿桩筏基础案例再分析[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3253-3262.
[5]	邓友生，万昌中，闫卫玲，时一波，肖本林，赵明华，. 大型圆形沉井结构应力及其周边沉降计算[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 502-508.
[6]	郑刚，邓旭，刘庆晨 , . 承压含水层减压降水对既有盾构隧道影响研究[J]. , 2015, 36(1): 178-188.
[7]	徐杨青，刘国锋，盛永清 . 深基坑嵌岩地下连续墙隔渗效果分析与评价方法研究[J]. , 2013, 34(10): 2905-2910.
[8]	孙玮泽，董军，崔玉萍，董飞 . 含初始缺陷地铁隧道的抗震动力学行为研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 283-288.
[9]	夏元友，裴尧尧，王震，陈少炎，陈晨 . 地下连续墙施工影响应力重分布的数值模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(11): 3433-3438.
[10]	张永兴，丁敏，王辉 . 基于Melan解的地下连续墙结构分析方法[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 2890-2896.
[11]	戴国亮，周香琴，刘云忠，刘立基，龚维明. 井筒式地下连续墙水平承载能力模型试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 185-189.
[12]	周广柱，徐伟，陈宇. 格形地连墙与软土相互作用的离心试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 134-140.
[13]	刘新荣，郭子红，裴丽，王吉明，林志，王芳其. 交错既有隧道次生力学效应三维模型试验[J]. , 2011, 32(9): 2609-2616.
[14]	王玉林，谢康和，王坤，李传勋，黄大中. 非均匀表皮效应对各向异性稳态承压井流的影响[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 2133-2138.
[15]	徐进，王旭东，刘运航. 地下水向水平井三维流动的有限层分析[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 922-926.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed