›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 415-423.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.02.014

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

低围压循环荷载作用下饱和粗粒土的动力特性与骨干曲线模型研究

周文权1, 2,冷伍明1, 2,刘文吉力1, 2,聂如松1, 2,杨 奇1, 2,赵春彦1, 2   

  1. 1.中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075;2.中南大学 高速铁路建造技术国家工程实验室,湖南 长沙 410075
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-27 出版日期:2016-02-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 冷伍明,男,1964年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地基基础、路基工程、地下工程方面的研究。E-mail: lwm123456@126.com E-mail:zwq_bill@126.com
  • 作者简介:周文权,男,1977年生,博士研究生,讲师,主要从事铁路路基填料方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. U1361204, No. 51408613);中国神华集团科研专项(No.SHGF-14-55);中国铁路总公司(原铁道部)重大课题(No. 2013G004-A-2)。

Dynamic behavior and backbone curve model of saturated coarse-grained soil under cyclic loading and low confining pressure

ZHOU Wen-quan1, 2, LENG Wu-ming1, 2, LIU Wen-jie1, 2, NIE Ru-song1, 2, YANG Qi1, 2, ZHAO Chun-yan1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 2. National Engineering Laboratory for High Speed Railway Construction, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China
  • Received:2015-05-27 Online:2016-02-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1361204 and 51408613), the Special Research Projects of Shenhua Group Corporation Limited of China (SHGF-14-55) and the Major Projects of China Railway Corporation (2013G004-A-2).

摘要: 基床层是铁路路基的核心组成部分,一般为粗颗粒土,厚约2.5~3.0 m,长期直接承受行车荷载的反复作用,其在动载反复作用下的变形特性是评价路基工作性能的关键要素之一。为研究粗粒土在列车循环荷载作用下的应力-应变特性,开展了一系列应力控制的单向循环加载大型动三轴试验,模拟列车动载和路基粗粒料填筑实际情况,包括不同动应力幅值(模拟不同列车轴重)、不同围压(模拟不同埋深)的动三轴持续振动试验。结果表明,在循环荷载作用下,土体刚度变化与振动次数、围压关系密切。根据动应力幅值大小的不同,循环荷载作用下饱和粗粒土的动应变随振次的发展形态可分为3种类型:稳定型、破坏型和临界型。根据试验所得出的动应力-应变关系曲线特点,建立了含围压和循环振次的骨干曲线模型。与传统的骨干曲线模型相比,该模型能反映土体刚度随循环振次的变化,更能反映列车往复作用的实际情况;同时该模型能用于估算路基土体动强度,对铁路路基核心层的动力变形稳定性评价和基于动力变形控制的路基设计具有参考价值。

关键词: 粗粒土, 循环荷载, 大型动三轴试验, 动应力-应变, 滞回圈, 骨干曲线

Abstract: The subgrade bed layer is the core part of railway subgrade composed of coarse-grained soil (CGS), which is generally about 2.5-3.0 m thick. It is this layer that is directly subjected to long-term effect of repeated traffic loading. The deformation of the subgrade bed layer under cyclic dynamic loading is one of the key factors to evaluate the operating performance of subgrade. To study the stress-strain characteristics of CGS under cyclic loading, a series of large-scale dynamic triaxial tests is carried out at different confining pressures (simulating different depths under the effect of lateral pressure) and dynamic stress amplitudes (simulating different axle loads), to simulate dynamic loading of train and actual situation of CGS filling by one-way cyclic stress-controlled loading. The results show that, under the cyclic loading, the change for soil stiffness is closely related to the vibration number and confining pressure. According to different dynamic stress amplitudes, the dynamic strain of saturated CGS under cyclic loading can be divided into three types according to development trends of vibration times: stable, destructive and critical. Based on the experimental results, a backbone curve model is developed including confining pressure and vibration times. Compared with the traditional backbone curve model, the proposed model can reflect the variation of soil stiffness with vibration times and the actual situation of cyclic effect of train. In addition, the model can also be used to determine the dynamic strength of subgrade soil, providing reference for evaluating dynamic stress deformation stability for subgrade bed core layer of railway and subgrade bed design based on dynamic deformation control.

Key words: coarse-grained soil, cyclic loading, large-size dynamic triaxial tests, dynamic stress-strain, hysteresis loops, backbone curve

中图分类号: 

  • TU 441.8

[1] 王康宇, 庄妍, 耿雪玉, . 铁路路基粗粒土填料临界动应力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1865-1873.
[2] 张升, 高峰, 陈琪磊, 盛岱超, . 砂-粉土混合料在列车荷载作用下 细颗粒迁移机制试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1591-1598.
[3] 王钰轲, 万永帅, 方宏远, 曾长女, 石明生, 吴迪, . 圆形应力路径下软黏土的动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1643-1652.
[4] 李潇旋, 李涛, 李舰, 张涛. 循环荷载下非饱和结构性黏土的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1153-1160.
[5] 李宗泽, 姜德义, 范金洋, 陈 结, 刘 伟, 吴 斐, 杜 超, 康燕飞. 盐岩三轴间隔疲劳特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1305-1312.
[6] 毕宗琦, 宫全美, 周顺华, 程茜, . 循环荷载下竖向土拱演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 886-894.
[7] 李潇旋, 李涛, 彭丽云, . 控制吸力循环荷载下非饱和黏性土 的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 552-560.
[8] 唐晓武, 柳江南, 杨晓秋, 俞悦. 开孔管桩动孔压消散特性的理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3335-3343.
[9] 梁 珂, 陈国兴, 何 杨, 刘景儒, . 基于相关函数理论的动模量和阻尼比计算新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1368-1376.
[10] 郭万里, 朱俊高, 钱 彬, 张 丹, . 粗粒土的颗粒破碎演化模型及其试验验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1023-1029.
[11] 郭万里, 蔡正银, 武颖利, 黄英豪. 粗粒土的颗粒破碎耗能及剪胀方程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4703-4710.
[12] 杨小彬, 程虹铭, 吕嘉琦, 侯鑫, 聂朝刚, . 三轴循环荷载下砂岩损伤耗能比演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3751-3757.
[13] 刘 斌, 许宏发, 董 璐, 马语卿, 李可良, . 岩盐循环荷载下基于DS黏壶的非线性流变模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 107-114.
[14] 时 刚,刘忠玉,李永辉. 循环荷载作用下考虑非达西渗流的软黏土一维流变固结分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 521-528.
[15] 程星磊,王建华,王哲学,. 软黏土中吸力锚循环失稳过程的模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3285-3293.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!