岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 3335-3343.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1294

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

开孔管桩动孔压消散特性的理论研究

唐晓武,柳江南,杨晓秋,俞悦   

  1. 浙江大学 滨海和城市岩土工程研究中心,浙江 杭州 310058
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-14 出版日期:2019-09-10 发布日期:2019-09-03
  • 作者简介:唐晓武,男,1966年生,博士后,教授,主要从事土工合成材料,软土地基处理以及土遗址保护领域的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51779218);浙江省文物保护科技项目(No.2013010)

Theoretical study of dynamic pore water pressure dissipation characteristics of open-hole pipe pile

TANG Xiao-wu, LIU Jiang-nan, YANG Xiao-qiu, YU Yue   

  1. Research Center of Urban and Coastal Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, Chian
  • Received:2018-07-14 Online:2019-09-10 Published:2019-09-03
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51779218), Zhejiang Province Cultural Relics Protection and Science and Technology Project(2013010).

摘要: 可液化地基在遇到地震作用或任何其他突变应力条件下,土体会迅速丧失强度和刚度,发生液化,从而失去承载能力。传统的抗液化措施主要集中在地基处理层面,而开孔管桩则兼具抗液化性能和承载能力。在假设开孔管桩孔洞内液体流动满足Poiseuille方程且等应变假设成立的前提下,结合开孔管桩复合地基的应力集中现象,推导出地基在时变荷载作用下的径竖向组合孔压解析解。考虑到循环荷载作用下的孔压积累现象,进一步利用孔压发展的经验模型改进该解析解。在此解析解的基础上,分析、对比开孔管桩、碎石桩、不排水桩以及天然地基的孔压发展情况,得出开孔管桩具有最好的孔压消散能力。桩?土模量比、井径比等因素对孔压的发展都有重要的影响,桩?土模量比越大、井径比越小,孔压消散速率越快。桩本身开孔系数对孔压发展的影响不明显。荷载频率只影响初始孔压峰值,并不影响孔压振荡衰减的速率。

关键词: 开孔管桩, 循环荷载, 孔压积累, 孔压消散

Abstract: Under conditions of seismic action or any other mutation stresses, the soil of the liquefiable foundation can lose its strength and stiffness rapidly due to the liquefication, resulting in the loss of the bearing capacity. The traditional anti-liquefaction measures mainly focus on the ground treatment, while the open-hole pipe pile provided in this paper has both anti-liquefaction and bearing capacity. Firstly, the liquid flow in the holes of the pipe pile is assumed to meet the Poiseuille equation, and the equal strain assumption is applied. Then we derive the analytic solution of the pore pressure considering both radial and vertical flows under the time-varying load, combined with the stress concentration phenomenon of the pipe pile composite foundation. Furthermore, considering the pore pressure accumulation under cyclic loading, the analytical solution is improved by using the empirical model of pore pressure development. Based on the analytical solution, this paper analyzes and compares the development of pore pressure of the open-hole pipe piles, gravel piles, undrained piles and natural foundation. Thus, the results indicate that the open-hole pipe pile has the best drainage capacity. The factors such as the modulus ratio of pile and soil and the radius ratio have important influence on the development of pore pressure. The higher the modulus ratio of pile and soil is, the smaller the radius ratio is, and the faster the pore pressure dissipation rate is. The influence of open-hole coefficient on the development of pore pressure is not obvious. The load frequency only affects the peak value of initial pore pressure and has little influence on the rate of pore pressure oscillation attenuation.

Key words: the open-hole pipe pile, cyclic loading, pore pressure accumulation, dissipation of pore pressure

中图分类号: 

  • TU473
[1] 张升, 高峰, 陈琪磊, 盛岱超, . 砂-粉土混合料在列车荷载作用下 细颗粒迁移机制试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1591-1598.
[2] 李潇旋, 李涛, 李舰, 张涛. 循环荷载下非饱和结构性黏土的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1153-1160.
[3] 李宗泽, 姜德义, 范金洋, 陈 结, 刘 伟, 吴 斐, 杜 超, 康燕飞. 盐岩三轴间隔疲劳特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1305-1312.
[4] 毕宗琦, 宫全美, 周顺华, 程茜, . 循环荷载下竖向土拱演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 886-894.
[5] 李潇旋, 李涛, 彭丽云, . 控制吸力循环荷载下非饱和黏性土 的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 552-560.
[6] 唐晓武, 杨晓秋, 俞 悦. 开孔管桩复合地基排水固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1248-1254.
[7] 杨小彬, 程虹铭, 吕嘉琦, 侯鑫, 聂朝刚, . 三轴循环荷载下砂岩损伤耗能比演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3751-3757.
[8] 刘 斌, 许宏发, 董 璐, 马语卿, 李可良, . 岩盐循环荷载下基于DS黏壶的非线性流变模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 107-114.
[9] 时 刚,刘忠玉,李永辉. 循环荷载作用下考虑非达西渗流的软黏土一维流变固结分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 521-528.
[10] 程星磊,王建华,王哲学,. 软黏土中吸力锚循环失稳过程的模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3285-3293.
[11] 张 炜,李 亚,周松望,蒋正波,吴 非,梁文洲,. 南海北部区域黏土循环动力特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2413-2423.
[12] 王闵闵,鹿 群,郭少龙,高 萌,沈仲涛,. 循环荷载作用下纤维水泥土动力特性[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1753-1760.
[13] 卢义玉,韩帅彬,汤积仁,周 雷,李泓涟,廖 引, . 循环荷载下支撑剂的变形及渗透特性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 173-180.
[14] 崔 凯,李永奎. 川西崩坡积混合土循环荷载下非饱和动本构模型[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2157-2166.
[15] 李 涛,唐小微. 两种黏粒含量淤泥质粉质黏土动残余应变试验[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1609-1619.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!