›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 1096-1108.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.04.024

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于矢量分析方法的边坡下滑推力计算

沈华章1,张国发2,王水林1,郭明伟1,葛修润1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 2. 贵州省交通规划勘察设计研究院股份有限公司,贵州 贵阳 550081
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-15 出版日期:2016-04-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:沈华章,男,1988年生,博士研究生,主要从事应变软化和边坡稳定性方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51179185,No. 41472289,No. 41302236);国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(No. 2014CB047100)资助。

Calculation of downslide thrust of slope based on vector analysis method

SHEN Hua-zhang1,ZHANG Guo-fa2,WANG Shui-lin1,GUO Ming-wei1,GE Xiu-run1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechanical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2.Guizhou Transportation Planning, Survey & Design Academe Co., Ltd., Guiyang, Guizhou 550081, China
  • Received:2015-09-15 Online:2016-04-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)(51179185, 41472289, 41302236) and National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2014CB047100).

摘要: 边坡抗滑稳定分析一直都是岩土力学与工程中的重要研究方向之一,研究成果众多。针对规范不平衡推力法在实际工程应用中的不合理现象,根据边坡抗滑稳定矢量和分析方法原理,提出了基于矢量分析的边坡矢量下滑推力计算方法,推导了二维及三维边坡强度储备型和超载储备型矢量下滑推力表达式。采用矢量分析方法计算了两个二维算例及一个三维算例的下滑推力,二维算例结果表明:矢量下滑推力方向受滑面倾角变化影响较剩余下滑推力小,矢量下滑推力在滑面不同位置处的变化比剩余下滑推力光滑,避免了剩余下滑推力精度受折线形滑面倾角变化影响过大的问题,当滑面为单折线时矢量下滑推力与剩余下滑推力相同。三维算例结果与对边坡稳定的已有认识保持一致。最后,采用这两种方法对西部某工程滑坡的下滑推力进行了分析,计算中主要考虑3种工况,分别为自重、暴雨和地震工况。结果表明,矢量下滑推力较剩余下滑推力有很好的改善。探讨了矢量下滑推力较剩余下滑推力的进步之处。

关键词: 边坡, 矢量和法, 不平衡推力法, 剩余下滑推力

Abstract: The stability analysis of slope has been a classic research field in geomechanics and geotechnical engineering. Numerous research results and analytical methods have been proposed in this regard. To overcome the defects of imbalance thrust force method adopted in the practical specification, both two-dimensional and three-dimensional formulations of strength margin and overload margin downslide thrust are developed, based on the principle of the vector sum analytical method of slope stability. Two 2D numerical examples and a 3D numerical example are investigated. The results of 2D numerical examples indicate that the variation of obliquity of sliding surface has less significant influence on the direction of vector downslide thrust than on the direction of residual downslide thrust. The vector downslide thrust curve is smoother than the residual downslide thrust curve, which helps avoid the problem that the precision of the residual downslide thrust is significantly influenced by the variation of obliquity of the polyline-shaped sliding surface. The results of vector downslide thrust and residual downslide thrust are the same when the sliding surface is a single polyline, and the result of 3D numerical example by the proposed method is consistent with the common understanding of the slope stability. The proposed procedures are used to calculate the downslide thrusts of a landslide in the western China under three working conditions, including the gravity condition, rainfall condition and seismic load condition. The results show that the vector downslide thrust result has been better improved compared to the residual downslide thrust. Finally, the potential improvements in the vector downslide thrust method are discussed.

Key words: slope, vector sum method, imbalance thrust force method, residual downslide thrust

中图分类号: 

  • TU 432

[1] 荣驰, 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 张铮, 张毅, 张庆艳, 刘奇, . 新型水玻璃−酯类注浆材料及其固沙体特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2034-2042.
[2] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[3] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[4] 周子涵, 陈忠辉, 王建明, 张凌凡, 年庚乾. 爆破荷载作用下露天矿边坡稳定性的突变研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 849-857.
[5] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[6] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[7] 朱彦鹏, 陶钧, 杨校辉, 彭俊国, 吴强, . 框架预应力锚托板结构加固高填方边坡 设计与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
[8] 李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[9] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[10] 刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性 分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[11] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[12] 王伟, 陈国庆, 郑水全, 张广泽, 王栋, . 考虑张拉-剪切渐进破坏的边坡矢量和法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 468-476.
[13] 姜谙男, 张权, 吴洪涛, 段龙梅, 焦明伟, 白涛, . 基于改进局部安全度的爆破作用边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 511-518.
[14] 吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
[15] 许婧璟, 唐旭海, 刘泉声, 冯禹菲. 基于能量跟踪法研究岩石破碎 对滚石运动轨迹的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 541-548.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!