›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (8): 2247-2253.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.08.016

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

红黏土工程性状的干湿循环效应试验研究

穆 坤,孔令伟,张先伟,尹 松   

  1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2014-04-26 出版日期:2016-08-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:穆坤,男,1985年生,博士研究生,从事特殊土的动力学特性方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41372314);中国科学院科技服务网络计划项目(No. KFJ-EW-STS-122);交通运输部西部交通建设科技项目(No. 20113184931700)。

Experimental investigation on engineering behaviors of red clay under effect of wetting-drying cycles

MU Kun, KONG Ling-wei, ZHANG Xian-wei, YIN Song   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2014-04-26 Online:2016-08-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41372314), the Program of Science and Technology Service Network Initiative by Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFJ-EW-STS-122) and the Science and Technology Project on Transportation Construction in the West Region by the Ministry of Communications.

摘要: 为研究湿热多雨气候条件诱发的干湿循环过程对红黏土长期性能的影响规律,对制样过程中干湿循环含水率变化幅度控制技术进行改进,制备不同干湿循环次数以及含水率变化幅度试样。利用固结排水三轴剪切与压缩试验,研究了干湿循环次数与干湿循环含水率变化幅度对压实红黏土工程性状的影响规律。结果表明,压实红黏土的黏聚力 与内摩擦角 均随干湿循环次数 的增加而衰减,首次干湿循环之后衰减效应最显著,其后较弱并趋于稳定, 的衰减程度小于c,且在低围压下的抗剪强度随干湿循环衰减更加显著;压缩模量E1-2随N的总体衰减规律与强度参数类似,但衰减幅度小于c而大于 ;随着干湿循环含水率变化幅度增大,压实红黏土c与E1-2略有减小, 基本不变,压实红黏土含水率在 4%变化范围内,具有相对稳定的力学特性。该研究表明,红黏土不宜直接用于填筑路床与边坡表层的填料,可以作为上下路堤堤心的填料,但必须采取防排水工程措施与边坡防护措施。

关键词: 红黏土, 干湿循环, 含水率, 强度, 压缩模量

Abstract: To investigate the influence of wetting-drying cycles in seasonal variation on the long-term performance of red clay, the traditional sample preparation method is improved, and the moisture content variation of compacted soil during wetting-drying cycles is controlled in the regime of saturation from the optimum water content to full saturation. Considering the dripping humidification, the 2% and 4% water content samples experienced by the wetting-drying cycles were prepared. The consolidated drained triaxial shear test and compression test were conducted to analyze the effects of wetting-drying cycles and moisture change amplitude on the engineering properties of compacted red clay. The results show that cohesion c and internal friction angle decrease with increasing cycle number N, and the decrease is significant in the first wetting-drying cycle and then becomes stable. However, the rate of decrease of is less than that of c, and the decrease of shear strength under low confining pressure is more drastic than that under high confining pressure during the cyclic wetting-drying process. Compression modulus E1-2 also decreased with increasing N and the decrease rate is less than that of c but larger than that of . Similarly, c and E1-2 decrease slightly with increasing moisture change amplitude of the cyclic wetting-drying compacted red clay samples. At the moisture content in range of 4%, the compacted red clay shows relatively stable mechanical behavior. It is suggested that the red clay should not be directly used as the backfill material, but can be used as the backfill material of the embankment core, if the drainage and slope protection measures are taken effectively.

Key words: red clay, wetting-drying cycles, moisture content, strength, compression modulus

中图分类号: 

  • TU 447

[1] 王磊, 张睿, 杨栋, 康志勤, 张鹏宇, . 实时高温富有机质页岩变角剪切力学特性及应变场演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2579-2592.
[2] 杨铮涛, 秦悠, 吴琪, 陈国兴, . 循环加载频率对饱和珊瑚砂液化特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2648-2656.
[3] 潘家军, 孙向军, 左永振, 王俊鹏, 卢一为, 韩冰. 骨架孔隙比对粗粒土强度变形特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2186-2194.
[4] 许彬, 刘新荣, 周小涵, 梁越, 钟祖良, 刘俊, 邓志云. 考虑贯通型结构面强度震动退化的岩质边坡动力稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2419-2431.
[5] 冉宇玲, 柏巍, 孔令伟, 李雪梅, 樊恒辉, 杨秀娟, . 基于频域反射的细粒土压实度检测方法与误差评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2458-2470.
[6] 周恩全, 姚缘, 崔磊, 王龙. 非饱和橡胶粉土抗剪强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1949-1958.
[7] 范雷, 余美万, 邬爱清, 向前. 层间错动带水力耦合抗剪强度特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1959-1970.
[8] 邱祥, 李锦鸿, 曾波, 付宏渊, 罗震宇, 陈镜丞, 刘忠伟, . 低应力条件下高液限红黏土湿化变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2028-2040.
[9] 曹嘉祺, 王洪新, 王平, 孙德安, . 基于荷载结构法和强度折减法的人防工程安全性评估方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2105-2114.
[10] 张延杰, 何萌, 宋萌, 曹立, 赵海涛, 李梅. 富水砂卵石地层力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1739-1747.
[11] 李宏儒, 梁恒楠, . 不同胶结剂人工结构性黄土的力学特性差异研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1416-1424.
[12] 张鸿朋, 马芹永, 黄坤, 马冬冬, 姚兆明, 张发, . 冻结砂不同应力路径三轴试验强度和变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1477-1486.
[13] 赵煜鑫, 李旭, 林森, 王逍萌, . 广吸力范围内一种改进的非饱和土抗剪强度模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 990-1000.
[14] 陈曦. 基于方向性粗糙度参数的节理峰值抗剪 强度理论模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1075-1088.
[15] 岳豪, 杨胜利, 翟瑞昊, 张燊, 崔轩. 含砂岩石力学特性及其致灾机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1230-1244.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 殷 杰,高玉峰,洪振舜. 连云港软黏土的不排水强度试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3297 -3301 .
[2] 陈绍杰,郭惟嘉,杨永杰. 煤岩蠕变模型与破坏特征试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2595 -2598 .
[3] 赵炼恒,罗 强,李 亮,杨 峰,但汉成. 层状岩体边坡动态稳定性拟静力上限分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3627 -3634 .
[4] 刘小丽,张丹丹,刘 凯,苏媛媛. 一种直剪式模型试验设备的设计及应用[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 475 -480 .
[5] 康永君,杨 军,宋二祥. 地震作用下边坡安全系数时程计算及参数研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 261 -268 .
[6] 卢坤林,杨 扬. 考虑位移影响的主动土压力近似计算方法[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 553 -557 .
[7] 李荣建,于玉贞,吕 禾,李广信. 饱和砂土地基上抗滑桩加固边坡的动力离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 897 -902 .
[8] 周万欢 ,殷建华. 上覆压力和剪胀作用下土钉抗拔的有限元模拟[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 691 -0696 .
[9] 钱建固 ,黄茂松. 土体塑性各向异性的微宏观机理分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 88 -93 .
[10] 朱崇辉 ,王增红 ,希罗科夫 B. H.. 单点击实法击实试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 60 -64 .