›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 1362-1368.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.1021

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于全相位多次互相关的Geiger声发射源定位方法

黄晓红1,孙国庆2,张凯月1   

  1. 1. 华北理工大学 信息工程学院,河北 唐山 063009;2. 华北理工大学 电气工程学院,河北 唐山 063009
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-06 出版日期:2018-04-11 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 作者简介:黄晓红,女,1973年生,博士,教授,硕士生导师,主要从事信号与信息处理方面的教学和研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.51174071,No.51374088);华北理工大学培育基金项目(No. GP201506)。

Localisation of Geiger acoustic emission source based on all-phase analysis and several times cross-correlation

HUANG Xiao-hong1, SUN Guo-qing2, ZHANG Kai-yue1   

  1. 1. College of Information Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei 063009, China; 2. College of Electrical Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei 063009, China
  • Received:2016-05-06 Online:2018-04-11 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the General Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51174071, 51374088) and the Project of Foster Foundation of North China University of Science and Technology(GP201506).

摘要: 直接互相关在岩石声发射源定位中,会出现多次峰值与波形密集的问题,在求解过程中会出现无解的情况且定位精度不足,为了解决这些问题,提出一种基于全相位快速傅里叶变换(FFT)分析及多次互相关的岩石声发射源定位的算法。通过对50 mm×100 mm×50 mm的花岗岩进行断铅试验,利用小波变换对互相关分析的频谱进行预处理,同时发挥全相位FFT的相位不变性的优点,找出波形峰值,得到时间差,最后利用最小二乘法得到定位初始点,再通过Geiger迭代,得到最终定位坐标。在选取8个测点的基础上,经声发射监测试验结果表明:该方法比单独直接互相关更容易找到波峰,且波形清晰,初始点的选择有效解决了Geiger迭代法对初始值要求严格的问题,通过全相位分析及多次互相关计算,然后Geiger程序迭代,得到的定位结果比直接互相关精度更高,平均绝对误差比美国生产PCI–2型声发射仪器Geiger定位的结果低 2.40 mm,比基于多次互相关和Geiger算法的声发射源定位结果低3.31 mm,比全相位相位差法声发射测试时间延迟定位结果低1.74 mm 。

关键词: 声发射, 小波变换, 全相位FFT, 多次互相关, Geiger, 源定位

Abstract: Since there are multiple peaks and waveform intensive problems by using direct cross-correlation for locating the rock acoustic emission (AE) sources, no solution occurs in the solution process and the positioning accuracy is insufficient. In this study, an algorithm of AE source localisation was proposed to solve these problems, based on all-phase FFT analysis and multiple cross-correlation. The experiments were carried out on granite specimens with the size of 50×100×50 mm3. The wavelet transform was used to pre-process the spectrum of cross-correlation. Meanwhile, the phase invariance of all-phase FFT was also applied to find the waveform peak and obtain the time difference. Finally, the initial point of positioning was acquired by the least square method, and then the final positioning coordinates were obtained through the Geiger iteration. Eight measuring points were selected and monitored during the experiments. Results indicate that this method is easier to find the wave peak than the direct cross-correlation, and can obtain clear waveforms. The selection of initial points can effectively meet the strict requirement on the initial value of the Geiger iterative method. It is found that the obtained results are more accurate than those by the direct cross-correlation. The mean absolute error of this study was 2.40 mm lower, compared with Geiger positioning result by the PCI–2 AE system from the United States. The result was 3.31 mm lower, compared with the result of AE source localisation based on multiple cross-correlation and Geiger algorithm. The result was 1.74 mm lower, compared with time-delay positioning result by the all-phase phase difference method for AE sources.

Key words: acoustic emission (AE), wavelet transform, all-phase FFT, multiple cross-correlation, Geiger, source localisation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 451

[1] 王创业, 常新科, 刘沂琳, 郭文彬, . 单轴压缩条件下大理岩破裂过程声发射频谱 演化特征实验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 51-62.
[2] 张艳博, 吴文瑞, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 黄艳利, 梁精龙, . 单轴压缩下花岗岩声发射、红外特征及 损伤演化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 139-146.
[3] 张晓君, 李晓程, 刘国磊, 李宝玉, . 卸压孔劈裂局部解危效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 171-178.
[4] 郭健, 陈健, 胡杨. 基于小波智能模型的地铁车站基坑变形 时序预测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 299-304.
[5] 甘一雄, 吴顺川, 任义, 张光, . 基于声发射上升时间/振幅与平均频率值的花岗岩劈裂破坏评价指标研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2324-2332.
[6] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[7] 张艳博, 孙林, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 刘祥鑫, . 花岗岩破裂过程声发射关键信号时 频特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 157-165.
[8] 郑坤, 孟庆山, 汪稔, 余克服, . 珊瑚骨架灰岩三轴压缩声发射特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 205-213.
[9] 张国凯, 李海波, 王明洋, 李晓锋, . 基于声学测试和摄像技术的单裂隙岩石 裂纹扩展特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 63-72.
[10] 楼烨, 张广清. 压裂液黏度对循环水力压裂影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 109-118.
[11] 刘希灵, 刘周, 李夕兵, 韩梦思. 单轴压缩与劈裂荷载下灰岩声发射b值特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 267-274.
[12] 杨道学, 赵奎, 曾鹏, 卓毓龙, . 基于粒子群优化算法的未知波速声发射 定位数值模[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 494-502.
[13] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 张广东, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, . 不同卸荷速率下矩形巷道变形及 声发射特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3309-3318.
[14] 宋义敏, 邓琳琳, 吕祥锋, 许海亮, 赵泽鑫, . 岩石摩擦滑动变形演化及声发射特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2899-2906.
[15] 程爱平, 张玉山, 戴顺意, 董福松, 曾文旭, 李丹峰, . 单轴压缩胶结充填体声发射参数 时空演化规律及破裂预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2965-2974.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!