›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 4079-4085.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0488

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

深圳地区原状花岗岩残积土硬化土模型参数的试验研究

庞小朝1,黄俊杰2,苏 栋2,肖文海1,顾问天1,刘 斌2   

  1. 1. 中国铁道科学研究院 深圳研究设计院,广东 深圳 518000;2. 深圳大学 土木工程学院,广东 深圳 518060
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-20 出版日期:2018-11-10 发布日期:2018-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 苏栋,男,1978年生,博士,教授,主要从事土体宏微观力学行为及本构关系、桩-土相互作用等方面的研究工作。E-mail:sudong@szu.edu.cn E-mail:pangxc81@163.com
  • 作者简介:庞小朝,男,1971年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩土工程的设计及科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51478273);中国铁道科学研究院重点课题(No. 2015YJ126);前海交易广场基坑及地下室结构工程地铁保护研究项目。

Experimental study on parameters of the hardening soil model for undisturbed granite residual soil in Shenzhen

PANG Xiao-chao1, HUANG Jun-jie2, SU Dong2, XIAO Wen-hai1, GU Wen-tian1, LIU bin2   

  1. 1. Shenzhen Research and Design Institute of China Academy of Railway Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, China
  • Received:2017-03-20 Online:2018-11-10 Published:2018-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51478273), the Key Project of China Railway Research Institute (2015YJ126) and Qianhai Trade Plaza Foundation Pit and Basement Structural Engineering Subway Protection Research Project.

摘要: 硬化土(hardening soil)模型是岩土工程数值分析中常采用的模型。为研究加载方式和排水条件对原状花岗岩残积土剪切行为的影响,对深圳地区原状花岗岩残积土进行了常规三轴固结排水、常规三轴固结不排水、固结排水侧向卸载和固结不排水侧向卸载4组试验,并由试验结果确定出不同加载方式和排水条件下的硬化土模型参数。结果表明:在常规三轴试验中,试样在剪切过程中表现为先剪缩后剪胀的特性,在侧向卸载试验中,试样始终表现为剪胀的特性;模型参数值与加载路径密切相关,固结不排水侧向卸载试验(CDLU)测得的有效内摩擦角 较常规三轴固结不排水试验(CD)试验大20%,而有效黏聚力 小了46%;CDLU试验得到的三轴压缩试验的参考割线模量 为CD试验的2.9倍,卸载再加载参考割线模量 为CD试验的1.8倍;在相同加载路径下,模型参数值也受排水条件的影响,由CU试验得到的 与CD试验的结果相近,但CU试验得到的 要明显大于CD试验的结果,CU试验得到的 为CD试验的2倍, 为CD试验的3.8倍。因此,在岩土工程数值分析中应根据工程的实际情况确定和选用模型参数值。

关键词: 硬化土模型, 三轴试验, 加载路径, 排水条件, 模型参数

Abstract: Hardening soil model is commonly used in geotechnical numerical analyses. In order to study the effect of loading path and drainage condition on the shearing behaviors of undisturbed granite residual soil. Four series of triaxial tests, including the conventional consolidated drained tests, the conventional consolidated undrained tests, the consolidated drained laterally unloading tests and the consolidated undrained laterally unloading tests have been conducted on the undisturbed samples of granite residual soil in Shenzhen. The values of model parameter for different conditions were also calibrated from the test results. It was observed that the specimens first contracted and then dilated in the shearing stage of the conventional triaxial test, but always dilated in the laterally unloading tests. The values of model parameters were closely related to the loading path. The effective internal friction angle measured by the CDLU tests was 20% higher, and the effective cohesion was 46% smaller than those by the CD tests. The reference secant modulus determined from the CDLU tests was 2.9 times, and the unloading-reloading reference secant modulus was 1.8 times those from the CD tests. The values of model parameters were also affected by the drainage conditions. The effective internal friction angle obtained from the CU tests was similar to that from the CD tests, but the effective cohesion obtained from the former was significantly larger than that from the latter. The reference secant modulus determined from the CU tests was twice that from the CD tests, and the unloading-reloading reference secant modulus obtained from the former was 3.8 times that from the latter. Hence, the values of parameters should be determined in accordance with the real loading and drainage conditions for geotechnical numerical analyses.

Key words: hardening soil model, triaxial test, loading path, drainage condition, model parameter

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470
[1] 孟庆彬, 王杰, 韩立军, 孙稳, 乔卫国, 王刚, . 极弱胶结岩石物理力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 19-29.
[2] 李丽华, 余肖婷, 肖衡林, 马强, 刘一鸣, 杨 星, . 稻壳灰加筋土力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2168-2178.
[3] 杨志浩, 岳祖润, 冯怀平, . 非饱和粉土路基内水分迁移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2241-2251.
[4] 王康宇, 庄妍, 耿雪玉, . 铁路路基粗粒土填料临界动应力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1865-1873.
[5] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 刘抗, 王彦臻, . 饱和珊瑚砂最大动剪切模量的 循环加载衰退特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 601-611.
[6] 梁珂, 何杨, 陈国兴, . 南沙珊瑚砂的动剪切模量和阻尼比特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 23-31.
[7] 周家作, 韦昌富, 魏厚振, 杨周洁, 李力昕, 李彦龙, 丁根荣, . 多功能水合物沉积物三轴试验系统的研制与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 342-352.
[8] 高运昌, 高盟, 尹诗, . 聚氨酯固化海砂的静力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 231-236.
[9] 孔亮, 刘文卓, 袁庆盟, 董彤, . 常剪应力路径下含气砂土的三轴试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3319-3326.
[10] 陈宇龙, 内村太郎, . 基于弹性波波速的降雨型滑坡预警系统[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3373-3386.
[11] 陈永青, 文畅平, 方炫强, . 生物酶改良膨胀土的修正殷宗泽模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3515-3523.
[12] 丁艳辉, 张丙印, 钱晓翔, 殷 殷, 孙 逊. 堆石料湿化变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2975-2981.
[13] 孔宪京, 宁凡伟, 刘京茂, 邹德高, 周晨光, . 应力路径和干湿状态对堆石料颗粒破碎的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2059-2065.
[14] 宫凤强, 伍武星, 李天斌, 司雪峰, . 深部硬岩矩形隧洞围岩板裂破坏的试验模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2085-2098.
[15] 李建朋, 高岭, 母焕胜. 高应力卸荷条件下砂岩扩容特征及其剪胀角函数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2119-2126.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!