岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (S1): 163-170.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0455

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于不同改性方法的分散性黏土处治试验研究

刘杰1, 2,杨玉婳3,姚海林1,卢正1, 2,岳婵3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉430071;2. 湖北省环境岩土工程重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;3. 武汉科技大学 城市建设学院,湖北 武汉 430065
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-04 修回日期:2019-07-23 出版日期:2020-06-19 发布日期:2020-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 卢正,男,1982年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事特殊土与路基工程研究工作。E-mail: lzwhrsm@163.com E-mail:liuj@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:刘杰,女,1983年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事饱和/非饱和土路基长期性能衰变机理与演化规律方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省杰出青年基金项目(No.2017CFA056);国家自然科学基金项目(No.41672312)。

Experimental study on treatment of dispersive clay based on different modification methods

LIU Jie1, 2, YANG Yu-hua3, YAO Hai-lin1, LU Zheng1, 2, YUE Chan3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Science, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Geo-Environmental Engineering, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 3. City Construction Institute, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430065, China
  • Received:2019-03-04 Revised:2019-07-23 Online:2020-06-19 Published:2020-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the outstanding youth fund of Hubei Province(2017CFA056) and the Natural Science Foundation of China(41672312).

摘要: 分散土的改性和利用是岩土工程的热点和难点问题,传统的方法是利用石灰改性,具有成本高、破坏环境等不利影响,亟需探索新的处治材料与技术。采用铝化合物和传统特殊土改性剂(石灰)分别对中国东北地区某均质大坝典型分散性黏土进行处治,研究不同类别、不同掺量的改性剂对分散性黏土物理化学性质、分散性及力学性质的影响,通过扫描电镜等微观试验,研究铝化合物改性分散性黏土的微观机制和改性机制。研究结果表明,当石灰掺量达到1%~3%、铝化合物掺量达到(2~4)×10?4 mol/g时,两者均具有较好的改性效果,且均能提高分散性黏土的抗剪强度;石灰对土样的颗粒组成没有显著影响,随着石灰掺量的增加,分散土的pH值增大,分散性得到有效抑制;在对土样产生团聚、胶结等作用方面,铝化合物可以改变土样的颗粒组成,能有效地降低土样的酸碱度,亦能达到优良的处治效果。与石灰改性分散性黏土相比,铝化合物具有环境友好、施工方便能够实现原位处治等优点,在实际工程中具有较高的应用价值。

关键词: 分散性黏土, 铝化合物, 石灰改性土, 分散性判别试验, 抗剪强度

Abstract: The modification and utilization of dispersed soil are critical issues in geotechnical engineering. The traditional modification with lime has a high cost and environmental damage and other adverse effects, so it is urgent to explore new treatment materials and technologies. Based on this, aluminum compounds and traditional special soil modifier(lime) were used to treat the typical dispersive clay in a homogeneous dam in northeastern China. The effects of different types and contents of modifiers on the physicochemical properties, dispersibility and mechanical properties of dispersive clay were investigated. The microscopic mechanism and modification mechanism of modified dispersive clay of aluminum compounds were studied by microscopic experiments such as scanning electron microscopy. The results show that when the lime content reaches 1%-3% or the aluminum compounds content reaches (2~4)×10?4 mol/g, both of the two modifiers show good modification effect and can improve the shear strength of the dispersive clay. Lime has no obvious effect on the particle composition of the soil. With the increase of lime content, the pH value of the dispersed soil increases and the dispersibility is effectively suppressed. The aluminum compounds can change the particle composition of the soil by agglomeration and cementation with the soil. Meanwhile, it can effectively reduce the pH value of the soil, which can achieve excellent improvement effects. Compared with lime-modified dispersive clay, aluminum compounds-treated soil has high application value in practical engineering with the advantages of environmental friendliness, convenient construction and in-situ treatment.

Key words: dispersive clay, aluminum compounds, lime-treated soil, dispersion identification test, shear strength

中图分类号: 

  • TU443
[1] 桂跃, 吴承坤, 赵振兴, 刘声钧, 刘锐, 张秋敏. 微生物分解有机质作用对泥炭土工程性质的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 147-155.
[2] 邹先坚, 王益腾, 王川婴. 钻孔图像中岩石结构面三维形貌特征及 优势抗滑方向研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[3] 瑜璐, 杨庆, 杨钢, 张金利. 塑性极限分析鱼雷锚锚尖贯入阻力[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1953-1962.
[4] 刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[5] 涂园, 王奎华, 周建, 胡安峰, . 有效应力法和有效固结压力法在预压地基 强度计算中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
[6] 李小刚, 朱长歧, 崔翔, 张珀瑜, 王睿, . 含碳酸盐混合砂的三轴剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 123-131.
[7] 张晨阳, 谌民, 胡明鉴, 王新志, 唐健健, . 细颗粒组分含量对钙质砂抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 195-202.
[8] 王欢, 陈群, 王红鑫, 张文举, . 不同压实度和基质吸力的粉煤灰三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 224-230.
[9] 郑耀林, 章荣军, 郑俊杰, 董超强, 陆展, . 絮凝-固化联合处理超高含水率 吹填淤泥浆的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3107-3114.
[10] 洪本根, 罗嗣海, 胡世丽, 王观石, 姚康, . 基质吸力对非饱和离子型稀土抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2303-2310.
[11] 周小文, 程 力, 周 密, 王 齐, . 离心机中球形贯入仪贯入黏土特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1713-1720.
[12] 付宏渊, 刘 杰, 曾 铃, 卞汉兵, 史振宁, . 考虑荷载与浸水条件的预崩解炭质泥岩 变形与强度试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1273-1280.
[13] 张景科, 单婷婷, 王玉超, 王 南, 樊 孟, 赵林毅, . 土遗址锚固土体-浆体(CGN+C)界面力学性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 903-912.
[14] 邱 敏, 袁 青, 李长俊, 肖超超, . 基于孔穴扩张理论的黏土不排水抗剪强度 计算方法对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1059-1066.
[15] 周建, 蔡露, 罗凌晖, 应宏伟, . 各向异性软土基坑抗隆起稳定极限平衡分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4848-4856.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!