岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (S1): 147-155.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1122

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

微生物分解有机质作用对泥炭土工程性质的影响

桂跃,吴承坤,赵振兴,刘声钧,刘锐,张秋敏   

  1. 昆明理工大学 建筑工程学院,云南 昆明 650051
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-22 修回日期:2019-07-20 出版日期:2020-06-19 发布日期:2020-06-09
  • 作者简介:桂跃,男,1982年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事软黏土力学及基坑、边坡及地下工程等方面教学与科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51568030,No.51768027,No.41662021)。

Effects of microbial decomposition of organic matter on engineering properties of peat soil

GUI Yue, WU Cheng-kun, ZHAO Zhen-xing, LIU Sheng-jun, LIU Rui, ZHANG Qiu-min   

  1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan 650051, China
  • Received:2019-06-22 Revised:2019-07-20 Online:2020-06-19 Published:2020-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Fundation of China(51568030, 51768027, 41662021).

摘要: 微生物分解作用会改变泥炭土有机质含量和组分,影响土的工程性质,为探究这种现象,研发了模型试验装置,利用富集菌液对泥炭土进行了为期90 d的分解,对分解过程中泥炭土的物理力学性质进行分析测试。试验结果表明,(1)90 d内泥炭土有机质含量从67%下降至61.5%,随着分解时长增大,泥炭土颗粒相对密度Gs、饱和重度γsat增大,液限wL有较为明显的下降趋势,塑限wP变化幅度不大;(2)分解后的泥炭土压缩系数a1-2下降,压缩模量Es增大;(3)分解后的泥炭土固结快剪强度普遍有15%~25%的增大,黏聚力ccq从最初的18.3下降为15.6 kPa,内摩擦角φcq从13.9o增大到18.8o;(4)分解时长增大,经过预压重塑泥炭土样的渗透系数有下降趋势。分析表明,泥炭土工程性质的改变不仅和有机质含量下降有关,还可能与组分变化有关。

关键词: 微生物岩土, 有机质分解, 泥炭土, 抗剪强度参数, 渗透系数

Abstract: The microbial decomposition can reduce the organic content of peat soil and change its composition, thus affecting the engineering properties of soil. To explore this phenomenon, a model test device was developed to decompose the peat soil with enriched bacteria solution for 90 days. Then the physical and mechanical properties of the peat soil were analyzed and tested during the decomposition process. The results showed that the organic matter content of peat soil decreased from 67% to 61.5% within 90 days. As the decomposition time increased, the relative density Gs and saturation γsat of peat soil increased, the liquid limit wL decreased significantly, and the plastic limit wP almost maintains constant. The compression coefficient a1-2 of the decomposed peat soil decreased, while the compression modulus Es increased. The fast shear strength of the consolidated peat soil generally increased by 15%-25% after decomposition. The cohesion ccq decreased from the initial 18.3 to 15.6 kPa, while the internal friction angle φcq increased from 13.9oto 18.8o. The decomposition time increased, and the permeability coefficient of the pre-compressed peat soil sample decreased. The mechanism analysis shows that the change of engineering properties of peat soil is not only related to the decrease of organic matter content, but also related to the change of composition.

Key words: microbial geotechnical, organic matter degradation, peat soil, shearing strength, permeability coefficient

中图分类号: 

  • TD452
[1] 薛阳, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 李麟玮, 廖康, 张龙飞. 库水升降条件下考虑饱和渗透系数空间变异性的白水河滑坡渗流变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1709-1720.
[2] 范日东, 杜延军, 刘松玉, 杨玉玲, . 无机盐溶液作用下砂−膨润土竖向隔离屏障 材料化学相容性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 736-746.
[3] 盛建龙, 韩云飞, 叶祖洋, 程爱平, 黄诗冰, . 粗糙裂隙水、气两相流相对渗透系数模型与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1048-1055.
[4] 李红坡, 陈征, 冯健雪, 蒙宇涵, 梅国雄, . 双层地基水平排水砂垫层位置优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 437-444.
[5] 彭家奕, 张家发, 沈振中, 叶加兵, . 颗粒形状对粗粒土孔隙特征和渗透性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 592-600.
[6] 王刚, 韦林邑, 魏星, 张建民, . 压实黏土三轴压缩变形过程中的渗透性变化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 32-38.
[7] 刘丽, 吴羊, 陈立宏, 刘建坤, . 基于数值模拟的湿润锋前进法测量精度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 341-349.
[8] 徐浩青, 周爱兆, 姜朋明, 刘顺青, 宋苗苗, 陈亮, . 不同砂−膨润土垂直防渗墙填筑土料的掺量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 424-430.
[9] 张玉国, 万东阳, 郑言林, 韩帅, 杨晗玥, 段萌萌. 考虑径向渗透系数变化的真空预压 竖井地基固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3533-3541.
[10] 胡明鉴, 崔 翔, 王新志, 刘海峰, 杜 韦, . 细颗粒对钙质砂渗透性的影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2925-2930.
[11] 李 贤, 汪时机, 何丙辉, 沈泰宇, . 土体适用MICP技术的渗透特性条件研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2956-2964.
[12] 范日东, 刘松玉, 杜延军, . 基于改进滤失试验的重金属污染 膨润土渗透特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2989-2996.
[13] 余良贵, 周建, 温晓贵, 徐杰, 罗凌晖, . 利用HCA研究黏土渗透系数的标准探索[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2293-2302.
[14] 陶高梁, 吴小康, 甘世朝, 肖衡林, 马 强, 罗晨晨, . 不同初始孔隙比下非饱和黏土渗透性 试验研究及模型预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1761-1770.
[15] 张 昭, 程靖轩, 刘奉银, 齐吉琳, 柴军瑞, 李会勇, . 基于土颗粒级配预测非饱和 渗透系数函数的物理方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 549-560.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!