岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (S1): 424-430.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0244

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同砂−膨润土垂直防渗墙填筑土料的掺量研究

徐浩青1, 2,周爱兆1,姜朋明1,刘顺青1,宋苗苗1,陈 亮2   

  1. 1. 江苏科技大学 土木工程与建筑学院,江苏 镇江 212003;2. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-27 出版日期:2019-08-01 发布日期:2019-08-17
  • 作者简介:徐浩青,男,1988年生,博士,硕士生导师,主要从事岩土渗流和环境土工等方面研究与教学工作
  • 基金资助:
    河海大学岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室开放基金项目(No.2018004);镇江市重点研发计划(社会发展)项目(No.SH2018024);国家自然科学基金项目(No.51579119)。

Study on bentonite content of different sand-bentonite vertical cutoff wall backfill materials

XU Hao-qing1, 2, ZHOU Ai-zhao1, JIANG Peng-ming1, LIU Shun-qing1, SONG Miao-miao1, CHEN Liang2   

  1. 1. School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212003, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China
  • Received:2019-01-27 Online:2019-08-01 Published:2019-08-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering of Hohai University(2018004), Key Research and Development Program(Social Development) Project of Zhenjiang(SH2018024), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51579119).

摘要: 土?膨润土垂直防渗墙在美国已广泛应用于城市卫生填埋场中,我国的工程中则应用较少。由国产膨润土与原地层土混合在自重应力作用下固结形成的防渗墙,其渗透性、孔隙和压缩性如何受膨润土掺量的影响,针对该一问题,使用福建标准砂模拟原地层,以3种典型膨润土作为混合料,在各掺量下对砂?膨润土填筑土料开展改进柔性壁渗透试验固结试验,研究不同膨润土掺量对填筑料渗透系数k、孔隙率n与压缩系数av影响。结果表明,膨润土和砂形成防渗墙时存在一个对应最小n和av的最优掺量Copt,当膨润土掺量小于等于Copt时,随着掺量增加,填筑料k下降很快,av缓慢减小;当掺量大于Copt后,随掺量上升,k降低速度趋缓,av快速地升高。理论上,膨润土掺入较少时黏土颗粒仅填充砂粒间的孔隙而不影响砂粒堆积,掺量达到一定程度后膨润土使砂粒彼此分离,悬浮在其中,填筑料的孔隙率随掺量而增大,可能是宏观上造成最优掺量产生的主要原因。

关键词: 防渗墙, 膨润土, 渗透系数, 压缩系数, 最优掺量

Abstract: Soil-bentonite cutoff walls have been widely used for municipal sanitary landfill in United States. However, there are less engineering applications in China and domestic bentonites and stratum have been mixed and formed to cutoff walls under the consolidation of self-weight stress. Less information is known to how the porosity, permeability and compressibility of cutoff walls are influenced by the addition of bentonite. To solve this problem, the effects of bentonite content on the k, n and av of sand-bentonite backfills are investigated based on several improved flexible wall permeability tests and consolidation tests using Fujian Standard sand as the simulated stratum and three typical bentonite mixtures as additional material. The results show that when bentonites and sand are mixed into cutoff walls, there is a critical bentonite content Copt, where the n and the av are lowest. If the bentonite content is less than or equal to Copt, k decreases rapidly and av reduces slowly with the increase in bentonite content. As the bentonite content is larger than Copt, reduced rate k slows down and av increases rapidly with the increase in bentonite content. In theory, when the bentonite content is much lower, clay particles only fit within the sand pore space and without disturbing the sand pack pattern. However, after bentonite content reaches Copt, sand grains become disconnected and are suspended in the bentonite, resulting in increased porosity of the backfill increases with bentonite content, which may be the main reason of the optimum bentonite content at the macro level.

Key words: cutoff wall, bentonite, hydraulic conductivity, coefficient of compressibility, optimum bentonite content

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 张虎元, 赵秉正, 童艳梅, . 混合型缓冲砌块导热性能及其均匀性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 1-8.
[2] 秦爱芳, 胡宏亮. 碱性溶液饱和高庙子钙基膨润土膨胀特性及预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 123-131.
[3] 桂跃, 吴承坤, 赵振兴, 刘声钧, 刘锐, 张秋敏. 微生物分解有机质作用对泥炭土工程性质的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 147-155.
[4] 薛阳, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 李麟玮, 廖康, 张龙飞. 库水升降条件下考虑饱和渗透系数空间变异性的白水河滑坡渗流变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1709-1720.
[5] 范日东, 杜延军, 刘松玉, 杨玉玲, . 无机盐溶液作用下砂−膨润土竖向隔离屏障 材料化学相容性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 736-746.
[6] DAO Minh-huan, 刘清秉, 黄伟, 项伟, 王臻华, . 膨润土加砂混合物干燥收缩特征及缩裂机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 789-798.
[7] 盛建龙, 韩云飞, 叶祖洋, 程爱平, 黄诗冰, . 粗糙裂隙水、气两相流相对渗透系数模型与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1048-1055.
[8] 李红坡, 陈征, 冯健雪, 蒙宇涵, 梅国雄, . 双层地基水平排水砂垫层位置优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 437-444.
[9] 彭家奕, 张家发, 沈振中, 叶加兵, . 颗粒形状对粗粒土孔隙特征和渗透性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 592-600.
[10] 王刚, 韦林邑, 魏星, 张建民, . 压实黏土三轴压缩变形过程中的渗透性变化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 32-38.
[11] 徐云山, 孙德安, 曾召田, 吕海波, . 膨润土热传导性能的温度效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 39-45.
[12] 刘丽, 吴羊, 陈立宏, 刘建坤, . 基于数值模拟的湿润锋前进法测量精度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 341-349.
[13] 谈云志, 彭帆, 钱芳红, 孙德安, 明华军, . 石墨−膨润土缓冲材料的最优配置方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3387-3396.
[14] 张玉国, 万东阳, 郑言林, 韩帅, 杨晗玥, 段萌萌. 考虑径向渗透系数变化的真空预压 竖井地基固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3533-3541.
[15] 胡明鉴, 崔 翔, 王新志, 刘海峰, 杜 韦, . 细颗粒对钙质砂渗透性的影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2925-2930.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!