岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 3563-3572.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0191

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

应力状态对粗粒料力学特性影响的大型真三轴试验

姜景山1, 2,左永振2,程展林2,潘家军2,张超1,韦有信1   

  1. 1. 南京工程学院 建筑工程学院,江苏 南京 211167;2. 长江科学院 水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430010
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-09 修回日期:2020-04-13 出版日期:2020-11-11 发布日期:2020-12-24
  • 作者简介:姜景山,男,1978年生,博士,副教授,主要从事粗粒土力学性质、地基和路基处理等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划资助(No. 2017YFC0404804);国家自然科学基金-雅砻江联合基金重点项目资助(No. U1765203);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51679072, No. 51778282);南京工程学院校级科研基金项目资助(No. CKJB201706);长江科学院开放研究基金资助项目(No. CKWV2017510/KY)。

Effects of stress state on mechanical properties of coarse granular material using large-scale true triaxial tests

JIANG Jing-shan1, 2, ZUO Yong-zhen2, CHENG Zhan-lin2, PAN Jia-jun2, ZHANG Chao1, WEI You-xin1   

  1. 1. School of Architectural Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211167, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China
  • Received:2020-01-09 Revised:2020-04-13 Online:2020-11-11 Published:2020-12-24
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(2017YFC0404804), the National Natural Science Foundation of China-Yalong River Joint Fund for Key Projects(U1765203), the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51679072, 51778282) , the Scientific Research Foundation of Nanjing Institute of Technology (CKJB201706) and the CRSRI Open Research Program (CKWV2017510/KY).

摘要: 土石坝所处的应力状态较接近平面应变应力状态或三维应力状态,而常规三轴试验低估了粗粒料的力学性能。应用大型真三轴仪对常规三轴应力状态、平面应变应力状态和真三轴应力状态( 0.25, 为中主应力系数, 、 、 分别为大、中、小主应力)下粗粒料的力学特性进行了压缩试验研究。试验结果表明:相同小主应力下,常规三轴试验、平面应变试验、真三轴试验的大、小主应力之差与大主应力方向应变的关系曲线依次变高变陡。某一试验加载条件下,体应变随球应力的增大而增大,初始剪切阶段增加较慢,随后呈线性增大,不同小主应力的体应变曲线较为接近。平面应变试验强度和真三轴试验强度比常规三轴试验强度有较大增长,真三轴试验强度增加百分比大于平面应变试验强度增加百分比。初始弹性模量随小主应力的增大呈线性增大。平面应变状态下中主应力系数随大主应力方向应变的增大而增大,初始剪切阶段增长较缓,之后近似呈线性增大。相同小主应力下,从常规三轴应力状态至平面应变应力状态再到真三轴应力状态,小主应力方向应变均为膨胀变形,且膨胀变形依次增大。同一试验加载条件下,小主应力较小时,应力比(偏应力与球应力之比)与偏应变的关系曲线位于上方。

关键词: 粗粒料, 大型真三轴试验, 力学特性, 平面应变应力状态, 中主应力, 偏应力, 球应力

Abstract: The stress state of earth and rockfill dams is close to plane strain stress state or three-dimensional stress state, while the conventional triaxial test underestimates the mechanical properties of coarse granular material. The mechanical properties of coarse granular material under conventional triaxial stress state, plane strain stress state and true triaxial stress state( 0.25) were investigated by compression tests using large-scale true triaxial apparatus. The test results show that the relationship curves between the difference of major principal stress and minor principal stress and the strain in the direction of major principal stress become higher and steeper in sequence from conventional triaxial test, to plane strain test, to true triaxial test under the same minor principal stress. The volumetric strain increases with the increase of the spherical stress under a certain test loading condition, which shows a slow increase at the initial shearing stage and then increases linearly. The volumetric strain curves are close for different minor principal stresses. The strengths of plane strain stress state and true triaxial stress state are much greater than that of conventional triaxial stress state, and the percentage of strength increase under true triaxial stress state is larger than that of plane strain stress state. The initial elastic modulus increases linearly with the increase of the minor principal stress. In plane strain stress state, the coefficient of intermediate principal stress increases with the increase of the strain in the direction of major principal stress. The coefficient of intermediate principal stress increases slowly in the initial shearing stage and then increases linearly with the increase of the strain in the direction of major principle stress. From conventional triaxial stress state to plane strain stress state and then to true triaxial stress state, the strains in the direction of minor principal stress are all expansion deformations, and the expansion deformations increase successively under the same minor principal stress. The relationship curve between the ratio of deviatoric stress to spherical stress and deviatoric strain of small minor principal stress is located at the top for a certain test loading condition.

Key words: coarse granular material, large-scale true triaxial test, mechanical property, plane strain stress state, intermediate principle stress, deviatoric stress, spherical stress

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 杨爱武, 杨少朋, 郎瑞卿, 陈子荷, . 轻质固化盐渍土三维力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 593-600.
[2] 杨春和, 张超, 李全明, 于玉贞, 马昌坤, 段志杰, . 大型高尾矿坝灾变机制与防控方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 1-17.
[3] 郤保平, 吴阳春, 王帅, 熊贵明, 赵阳升, . 热冲击作用下花岗岩力学特性及其随冷却温度 演变规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 83-94.
[4] 郑方, 邵生俊, 佘芳涛, 袁浩, . 重塑黄土在不同基质吸力下的真三轴剪切试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 156-162.
[5] 姜景山, 左永振, 程展林, 潘家军, . 不同密度粗粒料强度特性的大型真三轴试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2601-2608.
[6] 蒋长宝, 魏 财, 段敏克, 陈昱霏, 余塘, 李政科, . 饱水和天然状态下页岩滞后效应及阻尼特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1799-1808.
[7] 褚福永, 朱俊高, 翁厚洋, 叶洋帆. 粗粒料级配缩尺后最大干密度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1599-1604.
[8] 方瑾瑾, 冯以鑫, 余永强, 李震, 林志斌, . 真三轴条件下的原状黄土增湿变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1235-1246.
[9] 孟庆彬, 钱唯, 韩立军, 蔚立元, 王丛凯, 周星, . 极弱胶结岩体再生结构的形成机制 与力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 799-812.
[10] 吴二鲁, 朱俊高, 王龙, 陈鸽, . 粗粒料的单参数级配方程及其适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 831-836.
[11] 吴二鲁, 朱俊高, 郭万里, 陆阳洋. 基于级配方程的粗粒料压实特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 214-220.
[12] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[13] 彭守建, 岳雨晴, 刘义鑫, 许江, . 不同成因结构面各向异性特征及其剪切力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3291-3299.
[14] 雷江, 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 于洪丹, 马永尚, 谢华东, 王富刚, . 引红济石引水隧洞围岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3435-3446.
[15] 王冲, 胡大伟, 任金明, 周辉, 卢景景, 刘传新, . 侵蚀性环境对地下结构渗透和力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3457-3464.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[2] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[3] 郭军辉,程卫国,张 滨. 土工格栅低温下蠕变特性试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3009 -3012 .
[4] 朱泽奇,盛 谦,梅松华,张占荣. 改进的遍布节理模型及其在层状岩体地下工程中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3115 -3121 .
[5] 徐远杰,潘家军,刘祖德. 混凝土面板堆石坝的一种坝坡修整算法[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3139 -3144 .
[6] 刘 晓,唐辉明,罗红明,陈守义. 对滑坡防治工程相关规范中渗流问题的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3173 -3180 .
[7] 王 刚,蒋宇静,王渭明,李廷春. 新型数控岩石节理剪切渗流试验台的设计与应用[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3200 -3209 .
[8] 赵成刚,蔡国庆. 非饱和土广义有效应力原理[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3232 -3236 .
[9] 孙文静,孙德安,孟德林. 饱和膨润土及其与砂混合物的压缩变形特性[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3249 -3255 .
[10] 张 凯,周 辉,冯夏庭,房敬年,张元刚. Biot固结理论中连续性方程形式的讨论[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3273 -3277 .