跨活断层深埋隧道轴线错动位移模式试验研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1163

岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1304-1312.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1163

跨活断层深埋隧道轴线错动位移模式试验研究

刘小岩^{1, 2}，张传庆^{1, 2}，史铁勇³，周辉^{1, 2}，胡大伟^{1, 2}，朱国金⁴，朱勇^{1, 2}，王超⁴

1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学与工程国家重点试验室，湖北武汉 430071；2. 中国科学院大学，北京 100049； 3. 大连长兴岛经济区管委会，辽宁大连 116317；4. 中国电建集团昆明勘测设计研究院有限公司，云南昆明 640051

收稿日期:2020-08-06 修回日期:2021-01-20 出版日期:2021-05-11 发布日期:2021-05-07
通讯作者: 张传庆，男，1977年生，博士，研究员，博士生导师，主要从事深部工程灾害防护机制与新技术方面的研究工作。E-mail: cqzhang@ whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:liuxiaoyan171@ mails. ucas.ac.cn
作者简介:刘小岩，男，1989年生，博士研究生，主要从事深部跨活断层隧道的断错机制和病害防治方面的研究工作
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金联合基金项目（No. U1865203）；国家自然科学基金重大专项（No. 41941018）；湖北省自然科学基金创新团队（No. 2018CFA013）

Experimental study of axis displacement mode of deep buried tunnel across active faults

LIU Xiao-yan^{1, 2}, ZHANG Chuan-qing^{1, 2}, SHI Tie-yong³, ZHOU hui^{1, 2}, HU Da-wei^{1, 2}, ZHU Guo-jin⁴, ZHU Yong^{1, 2}, WANG Chao⁴

1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China; 3. Dalian Changxing Island Economic Technological Zone, Dalian, Liaoning, 116317, China; 4. PowerChina Kunming Engineering Corporation Limited, Kunming, Yunnan 640051, China

Received:2020-08-06 Revised:2021-01-20 Online:2021-05-11 Published:2021-05-07
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1865203), the Major Research Plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41941018) and the Hubei Province Natural Science Foundation Innovation Group (2018CFA013).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 活断层蠕滑错动会导致穿越其中的隧道轴线方向岩体发生变形，引起轴线弯曲甚至岩体破坏，沿轴向岩体的位移模式是隧道结构设计与安全运行的重要依据，特别是深埋隧道段，穿越活断层地质分区、错动方式及破碎带内的三维应力场是决定隧道沿轴线岩体变形破坏的关键因素，而现有物理模拟试验多用于研究浅埋隧道、地铁等工程受断层错动的影响，不适于深埋隧道条件的模拟。为此，考虑上述关键因素，采用自主研发的一套用于模拟三维应力作用下断层蠕滑错动的试验装置，以跨活断层凤凰山隧道为依托，通过模型试验研究了不同蠕滑错动量级下深埋隧洞轴线的位移模式，结果表明：断层蠕滑错动位移模式呈“S”形；小错动量下变形由错动盘向破碎带连续传递，而大错动量下错动盘与破碎带交界面发生滑动；破碎带内变形曲线呈“坡面线”形，带内错动位移传播宽度约为20 m。研究成果为穿断层隧道结构设计提供了重要依据。

关键词: 物理模拟, 活断层, 三向加载, 柔性加载, 蠕滑错动, 位移模式

Abstract: The creep slippage of active fault leads to shearing of rock mass along the tunnel axis, causing axis bending and even destruction of rock mass. The nonlinear distribution of creep slippage displacement in rock mass plays an important role in structural design and operation safety of tunnels. In deep buried area, the three-dimensional in-situ stress and the structure of fault strips are the key factors to be considered, which are evidently different from geological conditions in shallow buried tunnel or subway project. However, the existing physical simulation tests are mostly used to study faults in shallow buried tunnels, subways and other projects, and are not suitable for the simulation of deep tunnel conditions. In this paper, a new experimental setup for physical modelling of deep buried tunnel crossing active fault is developed and utilized to simulate fault creep slippage under three-dimensional in-situ stress. Based on the Fenghuangshan tunnel that crosses active fault, the axis displacement mode along the tunnel under different slippages is obtained through physical model test. The results show that the displacement mode along the tunnel axis is S-shaped. The shear deformation is continuously transmitted from slippage plane to crushed zone under small slippage, while the slippage occurs between slip plane and crushed zone under large slippage. The deformation curve within the crushed zone is ‘slope line’ shape, and the transmission width within the zone is around 20 m. This result could provide important knowledge for the structural design of fault crossing tunnels.

Key words: physical modelling, active fault, three-dimensional loading, flexible loading, creep slippage, displacement mode

中图分类号:

U 451

刘小岩, 张传庆, 史铁勇, 周辉, 胡大伟, 朱国金, 朱勇, 王超, . 跨活断层深埋隧道轴线错动位移模式试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1304-1312.

LIU Xiao-yan, ZHANG Chuan-qing, SHI Tie-yong, ZHOU hui, HU Da-wei, ZHU Guo-jin, ZHU Yong, WANG Chao, . Experimental study of axis displacement mode of deep buried tunnel across active faults[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(5): 1304-1312.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	侯振坤, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 黎剑华, 张树文, 徐晓斌, 刘春林, . 随钻跟管桩竖向承载性能原位试验与室内物理模拟试验对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 419-429.
[2]	朱元甲, 贺拿, 钟卫, 孔纪名, . 间歇型降雨对堆积层斜坡变形破坏的物理模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 4035-4044.
[3]	许江, 宋肖徵, 彭守建, 张超林, 李奇贤, 张小蕾, . 顺层钻孔布置间距对煤层瓦斯抽采效果影响的物理模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4581-4589.
[4]	赵建军，余建乐，解明礼，柴贺军，李涛，步凡，蔺冰，. 降雨诱发填方路堤边坡变形机制物理模拟研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2933-2940.
[5]	唐然，许强，吴斌，范宣梅，. 平推式滑坡运动距离计算模型[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1009-1019.
[6]	许江，苏小鹏，彭守建，刘义鑫，冯丹，刘龙荣, . 卸压区不同钻孔长度抽采条件下瓦斯运移特性试验[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 103-111.
[7]	蒋毅，魏思宇，尚彦军，高强，李严严,. 深部复合地层力学性质研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 266-272.
[8]	许江，刘龙荣，彭守建，冯丹，苏小鹏，张兰, . 不同吸附性气体抽采过程中煤储层参数演化特征研究[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1647-1656.
[9]	张庆贺，王汉鹏，李术才，薛俊华，张冰，朱海洋，张德民，. 煤与瓦斯突出物理模拟试验中甲烷相似气体的探索[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 479-486.
[10]	张超林，彭守建，许江，耿加波，杨红伟，罗小航, . 煤与瓦斯突出过程中气压时空演化规律[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 81-90.
[11]	马耕，张帆，刘晓，冯丹，张鹏伟，. 地应力对破裂压力和水力裂缝影响的试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 216-222.
[12]	马永政，蔡可键，郑宏,. 混合多位移模式的非连续变形分析法研究[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 867-874.
[13]	齐昌广，范高飞，崔允亮，张强,. 利用人工合成透明土的岩土物理模拟试验[J]. , 2015, 36(11): 3157-3163.
[14]	蒋明镜，贺洁 , . 基于颗粒抗转动模型的刚性挡墙被动土压力临界状态离散元分析[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2996-3006.
[15]	袁进科，黄润秋，裴向军. 滚石冲击力测试研究[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 48-54.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

跨活断层深埋隧道轴线错动位移模式试验研究

Experimental study of axis displacement mode of deep buried tunnel across active faults

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10