›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 867-874.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.03.032

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

混合多位移模式的非连续变形分析法研究

马永政1,蔡可键1,郑 宏2   

  1. 1. 宁波工程学院 建筑与交通工程学院,浙江 宁波 315016; 2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-25 出版日期:2016-03-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:马永政,男,1975年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土数值方法理论与物理试验研究
  • 基金资助:

    973项目(No.2014CB047100);浙江省自然科学基金(No.LY13E080009,No.Y1111133)。

An analysis of discontinuous deformation with mixed multiple deformation modes

MA Yong-zheng1, CAI Ke-jian1, ZHENG Hong2   

  1. 1. School of Architecture and Transportation, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315016, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2015-03-25 Online:2016-03-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by National Program on Key Basic Research Project (973 Program) (2014CB047100) and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LY13E080009,Y1111133).

摘要: 传统的非连续变形分析法(DDA)法采用简单的线性位移模式计算效率高,描述大块体的高阶多项式位移模式在一定程度保留了该特点,并提高了计算精度。近年来流行的耦合有限元、自然单元的DDA法实质上是引入相应的插值形函数构成块体位移函数,计算相对低效,但具有计算更精细、更容易施加边界条件等优点。为结合传统DDA法与DDA耦合法各自的优点,建立了一种同时利用传统DDA法线性位移模式与耦合型DDA法非线性位移模式的混合法。该方法非线性模式主要针对大块体,采用了自然单元插值,缘于其具有一定无网格特征,且效率比有限元高。建立了混合模式下的整体矩阵并推导出接触等因素刚度子矩阵和荷载子向量的具体表达式。该方法建模更加方便合理,计算精度、效率介于线性模式的传统DDA法和非线性位移模式的耦合法之间。通过基本算例验证了混合法的有效性,并给出了节理围岩-隧道衬砌整体分析模型的计算结果,体现了新方法的优越性。

关键词: DDA, 线性位移模式, 自然单元法, 非线性位移模式, 耦合

Abstract: The traditional discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA) has high efficiency by adopting simple linear displacement mode, and the high-order polynomial displacement mode of the large blocks retains the characteristics and improves the calculation accuracy. The recently developed DDAs coupling FEM or natural element method (NEM) is a kind of the DDA models that use the FEM or NEM shape functions to construct block displacement functions, and has the properties of interpolation and high precision, and displacement boundary conditions can be directly imposed. However, these methods are less efficient than the original DDA. To combine the advantages of the traditional DDA and the DDA coupling method, a hybrid method is established for the linear displacement mode and the coupled DDA using the traditional DDA. In this method, the nonlinear model is mainly used for large blocks, and the natural element interpolation is adopted with certain characteristics of non-grid, and the efficiency is higher than that of the finite element method. The integral matrix of the mixed mode is developed and the expressions of the contact and other factors such as the stiffness sub-matrix and the load subvector are derived. The computation efficiency and precision of the new DDA is between the linear DDA and the DDAs coupling FEM or NEM. Some basic examples are provided to verify the new DDA; and the calculation results of the overall analysis of jointed surrounding rock-tunnel lining are given, showing the superiority of the new method.

Key words: DDA, linear displacement mode, natural element method, nonlinear displacement mode, coupling

中图分类号: 

  • O 242

[1] 王珂, 盛金昌, 郜会彩, 田晓丹, 詹美礼, 罗玉龙, . 应力−渗流侵蚀耦合作用下粗糙裂隙渗流特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 30-40.
[2] 李任融, 孔纲强, 杨庆, 孙广超. 流速对桩−筏基础中能量桩换热效率 与热力耦合特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 264-270.
[3] 姚玉文, 刘方成, 补国斌, 景立平, . 橡胶砂弹性动力学参数的弯曲-伸缩元试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2369-2379.
[4] 郑立夫, 高永涛, 周喻, 田书广, . 浅埋隧道冻结法施工地表冻胀融沉规律及冻结壁厚度优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2110-2121.
[5] 孙德安, 薛垚, 汪磊, . 变荷载作用下考虑半透水边界热传导性的 一维饱和土热固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1465-1473.
[6] 徐毅青, 邓绍玉, 葛琦. 锚索预应力初期与长期损失的预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1663-1669.
[7] 薛阳, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 李麟玮, 廖康, 张龙飞. 库水升降条件下考虑饱和渗透系数空间变异性的白水河滑坡渗流变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1709-1720.
[8] 胡田飞, 王天亮, 常键, 刘建勇, 卢玉婷, . 基于有限体积法的冻土水热耦合程序开发及验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1781-1789.
[9] 刘媛, 马祥华, 刘洋, 肖飞, 陈玉海. 干耦合超声波检测及波初至的自动拾取[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1455-1464.
[10] 郑立夫, 高永涛, 周喻, 田书广. 基于流固耦合理论水下隧道冻结壁厚度优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1029-1038.
[11] 侯会明, 胡大伟, 周辉, 卢景景, 吕涛, 张帆. 考虑开挖损伤的高放废物地质处置库温度-渗流-应力耦合数值模拟方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1056-1064.
[12] 侯公羽, 谢冰冰, 韩育琛, 胡涛, 李子祥, 杨兴昆, 周天赐, 肖海林, . 分布埋入式光纤与隧道衬砌耦合性能试验及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 714-726.
[13] 夏才初, 喻强锋, 钱 鑫, 桂 洋, 庄小清. 常法向刚度条件下岩石节理剪切−渗 流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 57-66.
[14] 许江, 邬君宇, 刘义鑫, 雷娇, . 不同充填度下岩体剪切−渗流耦合试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3416-3424.
[15] 陆晨凯, 孔纲强, 孙广超, 陈斌, 殷高翔, . 桩−筏基础中能量桩热−力耦合特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3569-3575.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!