›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 1388-1398.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.05.022

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on ultimate bearing capacity of Jinping-I Arch Dam based on impoundment period inversion

CHENG Li1, LIU Yao-ru1, PAN Yuan-wei2, YANG Qiang1, ZHOU Zhong3, XUE Li-jun3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. Schlumberger Technologies (Beijing) Ltd., Beijing, 100015, China; 3. Power China Chengdu Engineering Corporation Limited, Chengdu, Sichuan 610072, China
  • Received:2015-11-27 Online:2016-05-10 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(51479097,11172150) and Research Project of State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Hydraulic Engineering (2016-KY-02).

Abstract: It is known that Jinping-I arch dam is the highest arch dam in the world with a height of 305 m. However, the dam foundation lithology is quite poor due to f5, f8 and other faults exposed on the construction base layer. In addition, the foundation is highly asymmetric. Hence, the evaluation of the ultimate bearing capacity of Jinping-I arch dam cannot reach an agreement due to the geological complexity. Based on the deformation reinforcement theory and 3D nonlinear FEM program T-FINE, the concrete elastic modulus and dam foundation deformation modulus during impounding period are inverted using a direct method and values of the forward inverted plumb monitoring stations. Moreover, the validity and feasibility of the inversion parameters are verified in the impoundment period prediction and the ultimate bearing capacity analysis. The stress and displacement of dam body under normal conditions are simulated with the inversion parameters. Based on project analogy method, the ultimate bearing capacity of Jinping-I arch dam is evaluated completely, considering the yield zones, unbalanced force, plastic complementary energy norm, safety factors and other indexes. The reliability of design parameters is also verified by comparing the calculated results of inversion parameters and design parameters. The results show that K1 (the safety factor when crack initiating) of Jinping–I arch dam is double overload while K3 (the safety factor for ultimate load) is 8 times overload. Hence, it is confirmed that Jinping–I arch dam has a higher ultimate bearing capacity than other arch dams in 300 m height and thus the whole stability is guaranteed.

Key words: Jinping-I, ultimate bearing capacity, parameter inversion, project analogy, unbalanced force

CLC Number: 

  • TV223

[1] LI Chao, LI Tao, JING Guo-ye, XIAO Yu-hua, . Study on the ultimate bearing capacity of surrounding soil underlying gripper of shaft boring machine [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[2] ZHAO Ming-hua, PENG Wen-zhe, YANG Chao-wei, XIAO Yao, LIU Ya-nan. Upper bound analysis of lateral bearing capacity of rigid piles in sloping ground [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[3] YANG Xue-xiang, JIAO Yuan-fa, YANG Yu-yi, . Development and test of aerated inflation controlled anchors [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 869-876.
[4] MU Rui, PU Shao-yun, HUANG Zhi-hong, LI Yong-hui, ZHENG Pei-xin, LIU Yang, LIU Ze, ZHENG Hong-chao, . Determination of ultimate bearing capacity of uplift piles in combined soil and rock masses [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[5] MA Chun-hui, YANG Jie, CHENG Lin, LI Ting, LI Ya-qi, . Adaptive inversion analysis of material parameters of rock-fill dam based on QGA-MMRVM [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2397-2406.
[6] WANG Dong-yong, CHEN Xi, YU Yu-zhen, LÜ Yan-nan, . Ultimate bearing capacity analysis of shallow strip footing based on second- order cone programming optimized incremental loading finite element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4890-4896.
[7] ZONG Zhong-ling, LU Xian-long, LI Qin-song,. Comparison test of compression and uplift on pressure-static and grouting micropiles [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 362-368.
[8] YIN Jun-fan, LEI Yong, CHEN Qiu-nan, LIU Yi-xin, DENG Jia-zheng,. Upper bound analysis of the punching shear failure of cave roof in karst area [J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2837-2843.
[9] CAO Wen-gui, TAN Jian-hui, HU Wei-dong, . Upper bound of ultimate bearing capacity for the reinforced grounds [J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1955-1962.
[10] ZHANG Jian-hai, WANG Ren-kun, ZHOU Zhong, ZHENG Lu, ZHANG Ru, XIE He-ping, . Pre-load factor of the pre-stressed anchor cable in underground powerhouse with high geo-stress [J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1002-1008.
[11] LI Ze, LIU Yi, ZHOU Yu, WANG Jun-xing,. Lower bound analysis of ultimate bearing capacity of stone masonry retaining wall slope using mixed numerical discretisation [J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1100-1108.
[12] KONG Gang-qiang, PENG Huai-feng, ZHU Xi , GU Hong-wei, ZHOU Li-duo,. Model tests on bearing capacity of longitudinal section shaped pile under lateral load [J]. , 2018, 39(1): 229-236.
[13] LEI Yong, YIN Jun-fan, CHEN Qiu-nan, YANG Wei,. Determination of ultimate bearing capacity of cave roof using limit analysis method [J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1926-1932.
[14] HU Wei-dong, CAO Wen-gui, YUAN Qing-song,. Upper bound solution for ultimate bearing capacity of ground adjacent to slope based on nonlinear failure criterion [J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1639-1646.
[15] JIU Yong-zhi, ZHU Yan-zhi,. Nonlinear analysis for bearing characteristics of vertically loaded single pile in non-homogeneous soil under excavation [J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1666-1674.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!