›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S1): 209-214.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S1.027

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Calculation of ultimate bearing capacity factor Nγ for rough strip footings

XIE Xin-yu1, 2, 3, HAN Dong-dong1, 2, 3, HUANG Li1, 2, 3 , WANG Zhong-jin2, LIU Kai-fu4   

  1. 1. Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering & Architecture, Ningbo Institute of Technology, Zhejiang University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315100, China; 3. MOE Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China
  • Received:2015-08-18 Online:2016-06-16 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LY13E090010).

Abstract: The soil under foundation is assumed to be a rigid plastic medium and obey Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion; slip-line theory has been used to determine the bearing capacity of rough strip footings. The bearing capacity of footings is calculated with the finite difference method for given boundary conditions. The value of bearing capacity factor Nγ is consequently obtained without superposition approximation. The formula shows that Nγ is not only related to internal friction angle of soil φ but also to the dimensionless ratio F. The Nγ is a constant with the determined φ and F. The calculated Nγ is compared with other researchers’ results. It’s found that different assumptions made by other researchers are chief factors that lead to errors. The calculations of Nγ with different values of F and φ are presented and compared with results. Finally, two forms of suggested expressions to approximate Nγ are proposed according to numerical calculations. The errors between approximated values and numerical results are clarified. The approximated results are close to the numerical ones so as to prove to be practical to evaluate the ultimate bearing capacity.

Key words: strip footing, ultimate bearing capacity, slip-line theory, finite difference method

CLC Number: 

  • TU 443
[1] LI Chao, LI Tao, JING Guo-ye, XIAO Yu-hua, . Study on the ultimate bearing capacity of surrounding soil underlying gripper of shaft boring machine [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[2] ZHAO Ming-hua, PENG Wen-zhe, YANG Chao-wei, XIAO Yao, LIU Ya-nan. Upper bound analysis of lateral bearing capacity of rigid piles in sloping ground [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[3] YANG Xue-xiang, JIAO Yuan-fa, YANG Yu-yi, . Development and test of aerated inflation controlled anchors [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 869-876.
[4] HE Zhi-jun, LEI Hao-cheng, XIA Zhang-qi, ZHAO Lian-heng. Analysis of settlement and internal force displacement of single pile in multilayer soft soil foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
[5] LIU Zhong-yu, XIA Yang-yang, ZHANG Jia-chao, ZHU Xin-mu. One-dimensional elastic visco-plastic consolidation analysis of saturated clay considering Hansbo’s flow [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[6] CHEN Dong, WANG En-yuan, LI Nan, . Study on wave field characteristics of different media models of coal and rock [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 449-458.
[7] MU Rui, PU Shao-yun, HUANG Zhi-hong, LI Yong-hui, ZHENG Pei-xin, LIU Yang, LIU Ze, ZHENG Hong-chao, . Determination of ultimate bearing capacity of uplift piles in combined soil and rock masses [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[8] LIU Zhong-yu, CUI Peng-lu, ZHENG Zhan-lei, XIA Yang-yang, ZHANG Jia-chao. Analysis of one-dimensional rheological consolidation with flow described by non-Newtonian index and fractional-order Merchant’s model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2029-2038.
[9] GONG Wen-hui, ZHAO Xu-dong, QIU Jin-wei, LI Yi, YANG Han. Nonlinear analysis of one-dimensional consolidation of saturated clay including dead-weight effects and large strain [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2099-2107.
[10] WANG Dong-yong, CHEN Xi, YU Yu-zhen, LÜ Yan-nan, . Ultimate bearing capacity analysis of shallow strip footing based on second- order cone programming optimized incremental loading finite element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4890-4896.
[11] ZONG Zhong-ling, LU Xian-long, LI Qin-song,. Comparison test of compression and uplift on pressure-static and grouting micropiles [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 362-368.
[12] YIN Jun-fan, LEI Yong, CHEN Qiu-nan, LIU Yi-xin, DENG Jia-zheng,. Upper bound analysis of the punching shear failure of cave roof in karst area [J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2837-2843.
[13] CAO Wen-gui, TAN Jian-hui, HU Wei-dong, . Upper bound of ultimate bearing capacity for the reinforced grounds [J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1955-1962.
[14] LI Chuan-xun, DONG Xing-quan, JIN Dan-dan, WANG Yu-lin,. Large-strain nonlinear consolidation of double-layered soft clay with threshold gradient [J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1877-1884.
[15] LI Ze, LIU Yi, ZHOU Yu, WANG Jun-xing,. Lower bound analysis of ultimate bearing capacity of stone masonry retaining wall slope using mixed numerical discretisation [J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1100-1108.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!