›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 133-140.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.01.017

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of non-coaxiality on dilatancy of sand involving principal stress axes rotation

XIONG Huan1, GUO Lin2, CAI Yuan-qiang1, 2   

  1. 1. Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. Architecture and Civil Engineering College, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China
  • Received:2015-01-02 Online:2017-01-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars(51025827), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51408441) and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province in China (LQ14E080011).

Abstract: Traditional plastic dilatancy models are based on coaxial plastic flow rule when describing relations between the stress ratio and plastic strain increment, in which stress-dilatancy behavior of soil only depends on stress ratio. A large number of test results show that the stress and strain are non-coaxial during plastic flow under complex stress conditions involving principal stress rotation; so the non-coaxiality cannot be ignored when analyzing stress-dilatancy behavior of soil. In order to investigate the effects of non-coaxiality on the stress-dilatancy behavior of sand under complex stress conditions involving principal stress axes rotation, a series of fixed principal stress axes shear tests and pure principal stress rotation tests and combined loading tests are conducted on the saturated sand using a hollow cylinder apparatus. The test results indicate that the stress-strain non-coaxiality would result in the deviation between the stress-dilatancy curves and Rowe-line under different stress paths, which can be modified through the Gutiereez’s modified dilatancy equation by introducing a non-coaxiality factor. In this way, Rowe’s stress-dilatancy equation can be made more applicable to loadings involving principal axes stress rotation.

Key words: stress-dilatancy, non-coaxiality, principal stress axes rotation, stress ratio

CLC Number: 

  • TU 411

[1] ZHUANG Xin-shan, ZHAO Han-wen, WANG Jun-xiang, HUANG Yong-jie, HU Zhi . Quantitative research on morphological characteristics of hysteretic curves of remolded weak expansive soil under cyclic loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[2] FANG Jin-jin, FENG Yi-xin, YU Yong-qiang, LI Zhen, LIN Zhi-bin. Wetting deformation characteristics of intact loess under true triaxial conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1235-1246.
[3] MA Wei-jia, CHEN Guo-xing, WU Qi, . Experimental study on liquefaction resistance of coral sand under complex loading conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 535-542.
[4] HUANG Yu-hua, XU Lin-rong, ZHOU Jun-jie, CAI Yu, . Calculation of pile-soil stress in pile-net composite foundation based on improved Terzarghi method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[5] ZHANG Feng, CHEN Guo-xing, WU Qi, ZHOU Zheng-long. Experimental study on undrained behavior of saturated silt subject to wave loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2695-2702.
[6] LIU Jia-shun, WANG Lai-gui, ZHANG Xiang-dong, LI Xue-bin, ZHANG Jian-jun, REN Kun, . Cyclic triaxial test on saturated silty clay under partial drainage condition with variable confining pressure [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1413-1419.
[7] SHENG Yun-feng, CHEN Yuan, ZHOU Wei, MA Gang, CHANG Xiao-lin, . Dynamic response analysis of rockfill dam based on modified dynamic shear modulus model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 405-414.
[8] ZHENG Jin-xiu, ZHANG Jian-hai, GAO Ke-jing. Regression analysis of support measures of underground powerhouses and support strength criteria [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 303-310.
[9] CHEN Si-li, LI Yan-yu, ZHOU Hui, HU Da-wei. Three-parameter twin ?2 strength criterion based on ultimate stress ratio and its application [J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1948-1954.
[10] TIAN Yu, YAO Yang-ping, LUO Ting. Explanation and modeling of non-coaxiality of soils from anisotropy [J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2035-2042.
[11] JIANG Wen-yu, LIU Yi, . Determination of neutral plane depth and pile-soil stress ratio of the rigid pile composite foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12): 4554-4560.
[12] JIANG Jing-shan, CHENG Zhan-lin, ZUO Yong-zhen, DING Hong-shun,. Experimental investigation on strength characteristic of coarse-grained materials in three-dimensional stress state [J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3581-3588.
[13] ZHOU Zheng-long, CHEN Guo-xing, ZHAO Kai, WU Qi, MA Wei-jia. Effect of the direction angle of cyclic loading on undrained cyclic behavior of saturated silt [J]. , 2018, 39(1): 36-44.
[14] CHEN Wei-zhong, MA Chi-shuai, TIAN Hong-ming, YANG Jian-ping,. Discussion on rockburst predictive method applying to TBM tunnel construction [J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 241-249.
[15] LI Lian-xiang, HUANG Jia-jia, FU Qing-hong, CHENG Xiao-yang, HU Feng, . Centrifuge experimental study of mechanical properties of composite foundation with different replacement rates under additional load [J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 131-139.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!