Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (S2): 405-414.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0869

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Dynamic response analysis of rockfill dam based on modified dynamic shear modulus model

SHENG Yun-feng1, 2, CHEN Yuan1, 2, ZHOU Wei1, 2, MA Gang1, 2, CHANG Xiao-lin1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering of Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • Received:2018-05-17 Online:2018-12-21 Published:2019-01-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (2017YFC0404801) and National Natural Science Foundation of China(51579193).

Abstract: Experimental studies indicate that the dynamic shear modulus of rockfill is related to confining pressure and stress ratio; therefore, it is necessary to include the influence of confining pressure and stress ratio in the dynamic constitutive model of rockfill materials. This paper briefly introduce the existing dynamic shear modulus calculation formula considering the confining pressure and stress ratio, and proposes an improved dynamic shear modulus calculation formula. Comparing with the experimental results of dynamic characteristics of Houziyan limestone rockfill, rhyolite rockfill, overburden gravel, transition material and cushion material, the model can better fit the combination of different confining pressure and stress ratios. The experimental data of dynamic shear modulus and dynamic shear strain show that the model has good applicability and prediction accuracy. The Hardin-Drnevich hyperbolic constitutive model is used to the finite element analysis of the dynamic response of Houziyan rockfill dams. The dynamic shear modulus is calculated using the conventional formula and the improved formula presented in this paper. The overall dynamic response of the dam is compared. Using the formula for calculating the modified dynamic shear modulus considering the confining pressure and stress ratio, the maximum acceleration response in all directions of the crest will increase; and the increase value will be about 20%-35%.The maximum dynamic displacement decreases by 14% in the river direction and increases by about 10% in both the vertical and horizontal rivers.

Key words: rockfill dam, dynamic response, shear modulus, confining pressure, stress ratio

CLC Number: 

  • TV641
[1] ZHOU Yue-feng, YANG Zhe, RAO Xi-bao, XIAO Guo-qiang, ZHOU Li-ming, . Bending-extension element experiment to obtain elastic parameters of clay under different moisture contents [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 387-393.
[2] QIAO Xiang-jin, LIANG Qing-guo, CAO Xiao-ping, WANG Li-li, . Research on dynamic responses of the portal in bridge-tunnel connected system [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[3] HE Jing-bin, FENG Zhong-ju, DONG Yun-xiu, HU Hai-bo, LIU Chuang, GUO Sui-zhu, ZHANG Cong, WU Min, WANG Zhen, . Dynamic response of pile foundation under pile-soil-fault coupling effect in meizoseismal area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[4] ZHUANG Xin-shan, ZHAO Han-wen, WANG Jun-xiang, HUANG Yong-jie, HU Zhi . Quantitative research on morphological characteristics of hysteretic curves of remolded weak expansive soil under cyclic loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[5] LIANG Ke, CHEN Guo-xing, HANG Tian-zhu, LIU Kang, HE Yang, . A new prediction model of small-strain shear modulus of sandy soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1963-1970.
[6] HOU Zhi-qiang, WANG Yu, LIU Dong-qiao, LI Chang-hong, LIU Hao. Experimental study of mechanical properties of marble under triaxial unloading confining pressure after fatigue loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1510-1520.
[7] REN Yang, LI Tian-bin, LAI Lin. Centrifugal shaking table test on dynamic response characteristics of tunnel entrance slope in strong earthquake area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[8] GAO Jun, DANG Fa-ning, MA Zong-yuan. Reduction measure research for reduction of high stress level of ultra-high asphalt concrete core [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1730-1739.
[9] WANG Li-an, ZHAO Jian-chang, HOU Xiao-qiang, LIU Sheng-wei, WANG Zuo-wei. Lamb problem for non-homogeneous saturated half-space [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1790-1798.
[10] FANG Jin-jin, FENG Yi-xin, YU Yong-qiang, LI Zhen, LIN Zhi-bin. Wetting deformation characteristics of intact loess under true triaxial conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1235-1246.
[11] FENG Li, DING Xuan-ming, WANG Cheng-long, CHEN Zhi-xiong. Shaking table model test on seismic responses of utility tunnel with joint [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
[12] LI Zong-ze, JIANG De-yi, FAN Jin-yang, CHEN Jie, LIU Wei, WU Fei, DU Chao, KANG Yan-fei. Experimental study of triaxial interval fatigue of salt rock [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1305-1312.
[13] LU Wei, ZHAO Dong, LI Dong-bo, MAO Xiao-fei. Analytical method for dynamic response of fully grouted anchorage system of rammed earth sites [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1377-1387.
[14] ZHANG Heng-yuan, QIAN De-ling, SHEN Chao, DAI Qi-quan. Experimental investigation on dynamic response of pile group foundation on liquefiable ground subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[15] MA Wei-jia, CHEN Guo-xing, WU Qi, . Experimental study on liquefaction resistance of coral sand under complex loading conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 535-542.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!