›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 847-856.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.03.030

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Time-domain equivalent linearization method for two-dimensional seismic response analysis

YANG Xiao-mei, LAI Qiang-lin   

  1. Faculty of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, China
  • Received:2016-05-06 Online:2017-03-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51178123).

Abstract: The seismic response analysis of local complex sites with nonlinear characteristics has been the key problem to solve in prediction of seismic motion. Frequency domain equivalent linearization, widely used in the seismic response analysis of one-dimensional stratified sites, is extended to time domain and two-dimensional problems. A time-domain explicit finite element method can be used to consider nonlinear characteristics and it is suitable for seismic response analysis of complex engineering sites. In this method, the inner domain of the method is mainly used to realize the low-order finite element scheme of the explicit algorithm. The boundary of the artificial boundary is simulated by the boundary of the transmission boundary. The maximum tangent strain in the one-dimensional model is replaced by the maximum tangent strain in the plane strain state, and the equivalent shear strain is obtained according to the tangent strain of the whole time process. Each time the whole solution is solved by the time domain center difference, and the nonlinear characteristic analysis is done by iteration. In order to verify this method, two typical site models of horizontal stratified and two-dimensional basins are selected for simulation analysis. The results are compared with solutions of the traditional one-dimensional equivalent linearization model and the two-dimensional differential nonlinear calculation. The results show that the solution is in good agreement with the reference solution, and prove the reliability of the method. This method is used to simulate the surface vibration of the US Turkey Flat test site. The results are compared with one-dimensional equivalent linearization model and the measured record. The reliability of the method and the difference with the existing analysis model are discussed, and the influence of the nonlinear characteristics on the seismic motion is illustrated.

Key words: nonlinear characteristics, equivalent linearization, time-domain explicit finite element, seismic response

CLC Number: 

  • TU 435

[1] HAN Jun-yan, LI Man-jun, ZHONG Zi-lan, XU Jing-shu, LI Li-yun, LAN Jing-yan, DU Xiu-li. Seismic response of soil under non-uniform excitation based on shaking table test of buried pipelines [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[2] PAN Dan-guang, CHENG Ye, CHEN Qing-jun. Shaking table test of the effect of underground shopping mall structure on ground motion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[3] HAN Jun-yan, ZHONG Zi-lan, LI Li-yun, ZHAO Mi, WAN Ning-tan, DU Xiu-li. Nonlinear seismic response of free-field soil under longitudinal non-uniform seismic excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2581-2592.
[4] ZOU You-xue, WANG Rui, ZHANG Jian-mi, . Analysis on the seismic response of stone columns composite foundation in liquefiable soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2443-2455.
[5] SUN Guang-chen, XIE Jia-you, HE Shan, FU He-lin, JIANG Xue-liang, ZHENG Liang, . Dynamic responses of bridge-tunnel approaching parts under different seismic excitation directions in soft surrounding rock [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 893-902.
[6] XU Zi-gang, DU Xiu-li, XU Cheng-shun, ZHANG Chi-yu, JIANG Jia-wei. Comparison of determination methods of site Rayleigh damping coefficients in seismic responses analysis of underground structures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4838-4847.
[7] XU Cheng-shun, DOU Peng-fei, DU Xiu-li, CHEN Su, HAN Jun-yan, . Large-scale shaking table model test of liquefiable free field [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 3767-3777.
[8] LIU Zhong-xian, ZHANG Zheng, WANG Shao-jie, LIANG Jian-wen, WANG Hai-liang, . 3D seismic response broadband-simulation of the alluvial basin in urban region based on the FMM-IBEM [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 4101-4110.
[9] XU Ming, TANG Ya-feng, LIU Xian-shan, LUO Bin, TANG Dao-yong,. Seismic dynamic response of rock slope anchored with adaptive anchor cables [J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2379-2386.
[10] HAN Bing, LIANG Jian-wen, ZHU Jun,. Effect of lenticle on seismic response of structures in deep water-saturated poroelastic soft site [J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2227-2236.
[11] YAO Yu, WANG Rui, LIU Tian-yun, ZHANG Jian-min,. Seismic response of high concrete face rockfill dams subject to non-uniform input motion [J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2259-2266.
[12] LI Rui-shan, YUAN Xiao-ming, LI Cheng-cheng. Analysis of relationship between dynamic shear strain and vibration velocity of horizontal soil layers [J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3623-3630.
[13] YIN Xun-qiang, JIN Yu-hao, WANG Gui-xuan,. Seismic response analysis of nuclear island buildings considering soil-structure interaction and nonlinear soil foundation [J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1114-1120.
[14] XING Hao-jie, LI Hong-jing, YANG Xiao-mei,. Seismic response analysis of horizontal layered soil sites based on Chebyshev spectral element model [J]. , 2017, 38(2): 593-600.
[15] LEI Su-su , GAO Yong-tao , PAN Dan-guang , . Equivalent input of soil-structure interaction system considering radiation damping [J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 583-590.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!