Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 818-826.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1612

• Testing Technology • Previous Articles    

Determination of earth pressure by miniature earth pressure cell in centrifugal model test

LIANG Bo1, 2, LI Yan-jun1, 3, LING Xue-peng1, ZHAO Ning-yu1, 2, ZHANG Qing-song1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China; 2. State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Mountain Bridge and Tunnel Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China; 3. Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials & Reinforcement Technology Research for Marine Environment Structures, CCCC Wuhan Harbour Engineering Design and Research Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430040, China
  • Received:2017-07-31 Online:2019-02-11 Published:2019-02-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51608081) and the Science Program of Chongqing Municipal Commission of Urban-Rural Development (2016-0001).

Abstract: Earth pressure is an important test parameter in centrifugal model experiment, it can be affected by many factors such as the performance of the earth pressure cell, the stability of the centrifuge data acquisition system and the external environment, so accurate measurement of earth pressure is hard to obtain. As a component of earth pressure measurement, the performance of earth pressure cell can directly affect the accuracy of earth pressure measurement. To get more accurate test data, two common resistance strain type earth pressure cells are selected to test using the centrifuge data acquisition system. The calibration test shows that two cells’ calibration coefficients of sand are smaller than the factory calibration coefficients. The calibration coefficients of sand for the type I are 64.75% lower than the factory calibration coefficients, and that of type II are 18.77% lower. The coincidence degree between type II earth pressure cell and factory data is better than that of type I earth pressure cell. In a centrifugal model test for measuring the lateral earth pressure distribution of counterfort retaining wall with wall height of 10-30 m, type I earth pressure cell has some shortcomings, such as data distortion measured by factory calibration coefficients, poor stability and low sensitivity, compared with the type II cell. The results of calibration test and centrifugal test show that type II cell with self established data acquisition system has better performance than type I with static strain data acquisition system.

Key words: earth pressure, miniature earth pressure cell, calibration test, centrifuge model test, data acquisition system, connection method

CLC Number: 

  • TU 432
[1] CHEN Jian-gong, YANG Yang, CHEN Yan-han, CHEN Xiao-bing. Calculation of active earth pressure of cohesive soil behind retaining wall considering soil tensile strength [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1829-1835.
[2] YU Zhao-sheng, CHEN Xiao-bin, ZHANG Jia-sheng, DONG Liang, ABDOULKADER M S. Analysis of the nonlinearity of coefficient of earth pressure at rest and its calculation method for coarse-grained soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1923-1932.
[3] SHI Yong-yue, WANG Kui-hua, DONG Tian-wen, MA Xian-chun, HUANG Yong-wei. Study of key technologies of vacuum negative-pressure static pile load test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1699-1708.
[4] SONG Ding-bao, PU He-fu, CHEN Bao-guo, MENG Qing-da, . Model test on mechanical behavior of rigid load shedding culvert under high fill [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[5] ZHANG Ding-wen, LIU Zhi-xiang, SHEN Guo-gen, E Jun-yu, . Measurement of earth pressure of shallow buried tunnel with super large diameter and applicability evaluation of calculation method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 91-98.
[6] HUANG Da-wei, ZHOU Shun-hua, FENG Qing-song, LUO Kun, LEI Xiao-yan, XU You-jun, . Analysis for vertical earth pressure transference on overlaying soils of shield tunnel under uniform surface surcharge [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2213-2220.
[7] CHEN Jian-xu, SONG Wen-wu, . Non-limit active earth pressure for retaining wall under translational motion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2284-2292.
[8] ZHOU Xiao-wen, CHENG Li, ZHOU Mi, WANG Qi, . Behavior of ball penetration in clay in centrifuge testing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1713-1720.
[9] RUI Rui, YE Yu-qiu, CHEN Cheng, TU Shu-jie. Nonlinear distribution of active earth pressure on retaining wall considering wall-soil friction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[10] SHAO Sheng-jun, CHEN Fei, DENG Guo-hua, . Seismic passive earth pressure against the retaining wall of structural loess based on plane strain unified strength formula [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1255-1262.
[11] XU Peng , JIANG Guan-lu , WANG Xun, HUANG Hao-wei , HUANG Zhe, WANG Zhi-meng, . Centrifuge model tests on influence of facing on reinforced soil retaining walls [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1427-1432.
[12] ZHU Jun-gao, JIANG Ming-jie, LU Yang-yang, JI En-yue, LUO Xue-hao, . Experimental study on influence of stress state on at-rest earth pressure coefficient for coarse grained soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 827-833.
[13] TANG De-qi, YU Feng, CHEN Yi-tian, LIU Nian-wu, . Model excavation tests on double layered retaining structure composed of existing and supplementary soldier piles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 1039-1048.
[14] LIU Yang, YU Peng-qiang. Analysis of soil arch and active earth pressure on translating rigid retaining walls [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 506-516.
[15] ZHANG Ye-qin, CHEN Bao-guo, MENG Qing-da, XU Xin, . Stress mechanism and foundation contact pressure of high fill culvert under load reduction condition [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4813-4818.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!