Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 156-164.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2063

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on force of underground water in soil stability calculation

YIN Xiao-meng1, YAN E-chuan2, LIU Xu-yao2, LI Xing-ming2   

  1. 1. Faculty of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, Henan 464000, China 2. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2017-10-14 Online:2019-01-11 Published:2019-01-30
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2011CB710605), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41807240)and Nanhu Scholars Program for Young Scholars of Xinyang Normal University.

Abstract: In order to clarify the concept confusion and to avoid repeated calculation of the force in the groundwater condition, the characteristics of three kinds of groundwater forces in soil, namely pore water pressure and buoyancy and seepage force, are discussed. It is emphasized that the pore water pressure in seepage environment is related to water depth and hydraulic slope according to the energy conservation theory. Then the equivalent relationships for two volume forces (buoyancy and penetration) to the boundary force (pore water pressure) are discussed. The calculation method of groundwater force acting on the separate soil skeleton and the unity of soil skeleton and pore water in a seepage environment is explored. The former should use seepage force and effective gravity of soil particle to calculate equilibrium. The latter should use pore water pressure and saturated gravity of soil to calculate equilibrium. Then the improper use of the groundwater force in present codes for landslide stability analysis related to landslide control engineering is discussed in this paper. In addition, the calculation deviation caused by the improper use of the groundwater force is illustrated in an engineering example. The results show that two problems exist in the relevant specification: pore water pressure is calculated without considering hydraulic slope angle and the concept of pore water pressure and buoyancy are confused. Both cases will cause partial conservative design and engineering management based on the latter case will arise large economic waste.

Key words: soil stability, pore water pressure, seepage force, buoyancy, design code

CLC Number: 

  • TU 470
[1] ZHANG Xiao-ling, ZHU Dong-zhi, XU Cheng-shun, DU Xiu-li, . Research on p-y curves of soil-pile interaction in saturated sand foundation in weakened state [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2252-2260.
[2] ZHANG Sheng, GAO Feng, CHEN Qi-lei, SHENG Dai-chao, . Experimental study of fine particles migration mechanism of sand-silt mixtures under train load [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1591-1598.
[3] SHI Xu-chao, SUN Yun-de. Analysis of the evolution of excess pore water pressure in soft soil under linear unloading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1333-1338.
[4] WU Qi, DING Xuan-ming, CHEN Zhi-xiong, CHEN Yu-min, PENG Yu, . Seismic response of pile-soil-structure in coral sand under different earthquake intensities [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[5] LIU Zhong-yu, XIA Yang-yang, ZHANG Jia-chao, ZHU Xin-mu. One-dimensional elastic visco-plastic consolidation analysis of saturated clay considering Hansbo’s flow [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[6] ZHANG Zhi-guo, HUANG Mao-song, YANG Xuan, . Analytical solution for dissipation of excess pore water pressure and soil consolidation settlement induced by tunneling under the influence of long-term leakage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3135-3144.
[7] MO Zhen-ze, WANG Meng-shu, LI Hai-bo, QIAN Yong-jin, LUO Gen-dong, WANG Hui, . Laboratory investigation on pore water pressure variation caused by filter cake effect during slurry-EPB shield tunneling in silty sand layer [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2257-2263.
[8] HE Gui-cheng, LIAO Jia-hai, LI Feng-xiong, WANG Zhao, ZHANG Qiu-cai, ZHANG Zhi-jun. A coupled thermo- pore water-mechanical model for a weak interlayer in water saturated slope and its application [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1663-1672.
[9] XIA Tang-dai, ZHENG Qing-qing, CHEN Xiu-liang, . Predicting excess pore water pressure under cyclic loading with regular intervals based on cumulative dynamic deviator stress level [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1483-1490.
[10] WANG Hua-bin, LI Jian-mei, JIN Yi-xuan, ZHOU Bo, ZHOU Yu, . The numerical methods for two key problems in rainfall-induced slope failure [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 777-784.
[11] MENG Yu-han, CHEN Zheng, FENG Jian-xue, LI Hong-po, MEI Guo-xiong, . Optimization of one-dimensional foundation with sand blankets under the non-uniform distribution of initial excess pore water pressure [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4793-4800.
[12] HUANG Chao-xuan. Research on nonlinear consolidation calculation of foundation treated with prefabricated vertical drains [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4819-4827.
[13] GUO Shuai-jie, SONG Xu-guo, . Jacking resistance evaluation method of prefabricated diaphragm wall based on laboratory experiment [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 269-274.
[14] ZHAO Jian-jun, YU Jian-le, XIE Ming-li, CHAI He-jun, LI Tao, BU Fan, LIN Bing,. Physical model studies on fill embankment slope deformation mechanism under rainfall condition [J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2933-2940.
[15] WANG Yong-hong, ZHANG Ming-yi, LIU Jun-wei, BAI Xiao-yu, . Influence of excess pore water pressure on shear strength of pile-soil interface in clayey soil [J]. , 2018, 39(3): 831-838.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!