Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 1813-1822.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0081

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A state-dependent stress-dilatancy equation without state index and its associated constitutive model

SUN Yi-fei1, CHEN Cheng2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430070
  • Received:2018-01-12 Online:2019-05-11 Published:2019-06-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2017B05214) and the Research Funds from China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M621607).

Abstract: It has been recognized that the stress-dilatancy behaviour of granular soil depends on its material state. To consider such state-dependence, a variety of state parameters were suggested phenomenologically and incorporated into existing stress-dilatancy equations, e.g. Cam-clay equation, modified Cam-clay equation, by experience. In this study, a novel state-dependent stress-dilatancy equation is developed by using fractional stress gradient, where physical meaning of the fractional order is provided. The obtained stress-dilatancy ratio is determined by three factors: the fractional order, current load stress, and the distance from current stress to critical state stress. When the fractional order is larger than 1, the stress-dilatancy curve shifts from the modified Cam-clay stress-dilatancy curve towards the Cam-clay stress-dilatancy curve. However, when the fractional order is smaller than 1, the stress-dilatancy curve is located above the modified Cam-clay stress-dilatancy curve. When the fractional order is equal to 1, the proposed stress-dilatancy curve coincides with the modified Cam-clay curve. To validate the proposed approach, a state-dependent fractional plasticity model for sand soils is established by using the proposed stress-dilatancy equation. Then, a series of drained and undrained triaxial compression tests on sand and rockfill with different initial states is simulated and compared, from which a good agreement between the model simulations and the corresponding test results can be observed. Comparison with the model predictions of the UH sand model indicates that the UH model gives better prediction.

Key words: fractional calculus, plasticity, constitutive model, state dependence, sand

CLC Number: 

  • TU 443
[1] ZHANG Hu-yuan, ZHAO Bing-zheng, TONG Yan-mei, . Thermal conductivity and uniformity of hybrid buffer blocks [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 1-8.
[2] MENG Qing-bin, WANG Jie, HAN Li-jun, SUN Wen, QIAO Wei-guo, WANG Gang, . Physical and mechanical properties and constitutive model of very weakly cemented rock [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 19-29.
[3] ZHANG Ke, LI Na, CHEN Yu-long, LIU Wen-lian, . Evolution characteristics of strain field and infrared radiation temperature field during deformation and rupture process of fractured sandstone [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 95-105.
[4] WANG Xiang-nan, HAO Qing-shuo, YU Jia-lin, YU Yu-zhen, LÜ He, . Three-dimensional simulation of the separation of dam panel based on extended finite element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 329-336.
[5] GAO Wei, HU Cheng-jie, HE Tian-yang, CHEN Xin, ZHOU Cong, CUI Shuang, . Study on constitutive model of fractured rock mass based on statistical strength theory [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2179-2188.
[6] ZHU Jian-feng, XU Ri-qing, LUO Zhan-you, PAN Bin-jie, RAO Chun-yi, . A nonlinear constitutive model for soft clay stabilized by magnesia cement considering the effect of solidified agent content [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2224-2232.
[7] ZHAO Yi-qing, WU Chang-gui, JIN Ai-bing, SUN Hao, . Experimental study of sandstone microstructure and mechanical properties under high temperature [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2233-2240.
[8] MAO Jia-hua, YUAN Da-jun, YANG Jiang-xiao, ZHANG Bing, . A theoretical study of porosity characteristics on the excavation face of slurry shield in sand stratum [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2283-2292.
[9] YAO Yu-wen, LIU Fang-cheng, BU Guo-bin, JING Li-ping, . Laboratory study on elastic dynamic mechanics of rubber-sand mixture by bender-extender element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2369-2379.
[10] CHENG Yong-hui, HU Sheng-gang, WANG Han-wu, ZHANG Cheng. Study on depth effect of pressuremeter feature parameters in deep buried sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[11] LIANG Ke, CHEN Guo-xing, HANG Tian-zhu, LIU Kang, HE Yang, . A new prediction model of small-strain shear modulus of sandy soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1963-1970.
[12] RONG Chi, CHEN Wei-zhong, YUAN Jing-qiang, ZHANG Zheng, ZHANG Yi, ZHANG Qing-yan, LIU Qi, . Study on new sodium silicate-ester grouting material and its properties of grouted-sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2034-2042.
[13] XU Dong-sheng, HUANG Ming, HUANG Fo-guang, CHEN Cheng. Failure behavior of cemented coral sand with different gradations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1531-1539.
[14] ZHANG Sheng, GAO Feng, CHEN Qi-lei, SHENG Dai-chao, . Experimental study of fine particles migration mechanism of sand-silt mixtures under train load [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1591-1598.
[15] HAN Chao, PANG De-peng, LI De-jian. Analysis of energy evolution during the step loading and unloading creep experiments of sandstone [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1179-1188.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!