Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (S1): 341-349.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0357

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Accuracy analysis of wetting front advancing method based on numerical simulation

LIU Li1, WU Yang2, CHEN Li-hong1, LIU Jian-kun1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education of Urban Underground Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. China Construction America, Beijing 100000, China
  • Received:2019-02-12 Online:2019-08-01 Published:2019-08-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was suppted by the Project Topics of National Key R & D Plans(2017YFC0404803), Beijing National Science Foundation Project(8192034), Open Fund of state key Laboratory of Permafrost Engineering(SKLFSE201706), and China Railway Corporation Science and Technology Research and Development Program(2017G002-S).

Abstract: The permeability coefficient function of unsaturated soil is difficult to be measured and a long time is required. Wetting front advancing method(WFM) can be applied to measure the hydraulic conductivity function(HF) of unsaturated soil in a short time. However, this method relies on an artifical recognition of wet front, which has certain limitations. In addition, the measurement accuracy of WFM is not clear and needs to be verified. In this paper, impacts of parameters include of initial water content, critical water content of wetting front, rainfall intensity, location of sensor etc on the accuracy of WFM is analyzed. The Seep/W software is used to simulate the infiltration process occurs in the homogeneous soil column. The data is analyzed by WFM to calculate the permeability coefficient of the soil. Simulation results are compared with the input permeability coefficient(i.e. the real solution). The calculation accuracy of the wetting front method is evaluated and the source of error is discussed. The results show that WFM can obtain relative high accurate calculation results. Using the characteristic moisture content at the wetting front to calculate wetting front advancing rate, it overcomes the limitations of original wetting front advancing method with artificial observation and greatly expands the applicability of WFM. The sensor spacing has no direct effect on the calculation accuracy of the permeability coefficient function of wetting frontal advance method. The lower the initial water content, the greater the rainfall infiltration rate, and the greater the span of the permeability coefficient function. Based on the analysis in this paper, the following suggestions are proposed for test design of WFM. The soil column with a length of 30-40 cm and 3-4 sensors are suggested. Any initial water content is acceptable and the dry sample is the best choice. To avoid the surface ponding problem, the rainfall intensity should be smaller than the saturated permeability coefficient of soil.

Key words: unsaturated permeability coefficient, rainfall infiltration, wetting front, wetting front advancing method, soil pile test

CLC Number: 

  • TU443
[1] JIAN Wen-bin, HUANG Cong-hui, LUO Yang-hua, NIE Wen. Experimental study on wetting front migration induced by rainfall infiltration in unsaturated eluvial and residual soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1123-1133.
[2] SHI Zhen-ning, QI Shuang-xing, FU Hong-yuan, ZENG Ling, HE Zhong-ming, FANG Rui-min, . A study of water content distribution and shallow stability of earth slopes subject to rainfall infiltration [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[3] SU Yong-hua, LI Cheng-cheng. Stability analysis of slope based on Green-Ampt model under heavy rainfall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[4] ZHAN Liang-tong, HU Ying-tao, LIU Xiao-chuan, CHEN Jie, WANG Han-lin, ZHU Bin, CHEN Yun-min. Centrifuge modelling of rainfall infiltration in an unsaturated loess and joint monitoring of multi-physical parameters [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2478-2486.
[5] WANG Hua-bin, LI Jian-mei, JIN Yi-xuan, ZHOU Bo, ZHOU Yu, . The numerical methods for two key problems in rainfall-induced slope failure [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 777-784.
[6] ZHU Cai-hui, GUO Bing-xuan. Monitoring and inducement analysis of seepage of an ancient building base [J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4210-4217.
[7] ZHENG Jun-jie, GUO Zhen-shan, CUI Lan, ZHANG Jun,. Stability analysis of expansive soil tunnel considering unsaturated seepage and moistening swelling deformation [J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3271-3277.
[8] XIONG Yong-lin, ZHU He-hua, YE Guan-lin, YE Bin,. Analysis of failure of unsaturated soil slope due to rainfall based on soil-water-air seepage-deformation coupling FEM [J]. , 2017, 38(1): 284-290.
[9] ZHANG Jie, Lü Te, XUE Jian-feng, ZHENG Wen-tang,. Modified Green-Ampt model for analyzing rainfall infiltration in slopes [J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2451-2457.
[10] DOU Hong-qiang ,HAN Tong-chun ,GONG Xiao-nan ,LI Zhi-ning,QIU Zi-yi,. Reliability analysis of slope stability considering variability of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity under rainfall infiltration [J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1144-1152.
[11] TIAN Dong-fang ,ZHENG Hong ,LIU De-fu,. 2D FEM numerical simulation of rainfall infiltration for landslide with considering runoff effect and its application [J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1179-1186.
[12] WANG Ding-jian, TANG Hui-ming, LI Chang-dong, GE Yun-feng, YI Xian-long. Stability analysis of colluvial landslide due to heavy rainfall [J]. , 2016, 37(2): 439-445.
[13] QIN Xiao-hua, LIU Dong-sheng, SONG Qiang-hui, WANG Xu, , . Infiltration model of bedrock laminar slope under heavy rainfall and its stability analysis [J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3156-3164.
[14] CHANG Jin-yuan ,BAO Han ,WU Fa-quan ,CHANG Zhong-hua ,LUO Hao,. Discussion on stability of shallow landslide under rainfall [J]. , 2015, 36(4): 995-1001.
[15] LI Xu , FAN Yi-kai , HUANG Xin,. Applicability of wetting front advancing method for measuring hydraulic conductivities of unsaturated soil [J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1489-1494.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!