Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 3475-3484.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0626

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A necessary improvement of the viscoelastic method for calculating the dynamic behaviors of the concrete faced rockfill dams

WEI Kuang-min1, 2, CHEN Sheng-shui1, 2, MA Hong-yu3, LI Guo-ying1, 2, MI Zhan-kuan1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210024, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Reservoir Dam Safety of the Ministry of Water Resources, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China; 3. Xinjiang Water Conservancy and Hydropower Survey Design Institute, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830000, China
  • Received:2021-04-24 Revised:2021-07-22 Online:2021-12-13 Published:2021-12-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R & D Plan(2018YFC1508503), the Basic Scientific Research Funds in National Nonprofit Institutes(Y320004, Y320005) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1765203).

Abstract: At present, the viscoelastic method is widely used in the dynamic analysis of concrete faced rockfill dams (CFRDs), basically forming a method framework: the viscoelastic model for calculating the dynamic response and the permanent deformation model for calculating the permanent deformation. Then the dam safety is evaluated through both the dam dynamic response and the permanent deformation. However, when the current method is used in the dynamic analysis of the CFRDs, there is an obvious defect, i.e., it cannot consider the influence of permanent deformation on the stress of the concrete slab during the strong earthquakes, which may cause serious errors when applying the method in CFRDs with obvious permanent deformation. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the current method. This paper suggests to adopt the strategy of “divide first and combine later”. Firstly, the dynamic displacement and permanent displacement of the dam are calculated separately, then the two are added as the actual displacement of the structure, and finally, the strain and stress of the structure are calculated based on this actual displacement. This paper took the Yulong Kashi CFRD as an example to illustrate the necessity of the improvement.

Key words: CFRD, earthquake analysis, viscoelastic method, finite element method, Yulong Kashi

CLC Number: 

  • TU 45
[1] ZHAO Hai-peng, LI Xue-you, WAN Jian-hong, ZHENG Xiang-zhi, LIU Si-wei, . Analysis of laterally-loaded piles embedded in multi-layered soils using efficient finite-element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(7): 1995-2003.
[2] CI Hui-ling, BAI Bing, LEI Hong-wu, CUI Yin-xiang, . A high-precision scheme for field variables in finite element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(11): 3137-3146.
[3] SONG Yi-min, LING Xiao-kang, ZHANG Jing-zong, ZHU Chen-li, REN He, YUAN De-shun. Inversion of mechanical parameters of geomaterials based on DSCM-FEM [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(10): 2855-2864.
[4] DAI Xuan, GUO Wang, CHENG Xue-song, HUO Hai-feng, LIU Guo-guang, . Field measurement and numerical analysis for evaluating longitudinal settlement induced by shield tunneling parallel to building [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(1): 233-244.
[5] WANG Xiang-nan, HAO Qing-shuo, YU Jia-lin, YU Yu-zhen, LÜ He, . Three-dimensional simulation of the separation of dam panel based on extended finite element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 329-336.
[6] LI Jia-long, LI Gang, YU Long. Inelasticity-separated plane-strain element model and its application to Drucker-Prager model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1492-1501.
[7] XUE Yang, WU Yi-ping, MIAO Fa-sheng, LI Lin-wei, LIAO Kang, ZHANG Long-fei. Seepage and deformation analysis of Baishuihe landslide considering spatial variability of saturated hydraulic conductivity under reservoir water level fluctuation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1709-1720.
[8] JIANG Nan, HUANG Lin, FENG Jun, ZHANG Sheng-liang, WANG Duo, . Research on design and calculation method of tunnel-type anchorage of railway suspension bridge [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 999-1009.
[9] SUN Rui, YANG Feng, YANG Jun-sheng, ZHAO Yi-ding, ZHENG Xiang-cou, LUO Jing-jing, YAO Jie, . Investigation of upper bound adaptive finite element method based on second-order cone programming and higher-order element [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 687-694.
[10] ZHOU Feng-xi, MA Qiang, ZHOU Zhi-xiong, . 2D analysis of vibration-isolation efficiency of an open trench-wave impedence block barrier [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(12): 4087-4092.
[11] CHEN Jia-ying, TENG Jing-cheng, YIN Zhen-yu, . Macroelement modelling of caisson foundation in clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(11): 3823-3830.
[12] ZHANG Hai-ting, YANG Lin-qing, GUO Fang, . Solution and analysis of dynamic response for rigid buried pipe in multi-layered soil based on SBFEM [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2713-2722.
[13] WANG Xiang-nan, LI Quan-ming, YU Yu-zhen, YU Jia-lin, LÜ He, . Simulation of the failure process of landslides based on extended finite element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2435-2442.
[14] QIU Min, YUAN Qing, LI Chang-jun, XIAO Chao-chao, . Comparative study of calculation methods for undrained shear strength of clay based on cavity expansion theory [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 1059-1066.
[15] ZHENG An-xing, LUO Xian-qi, CHEN Zhen-hua, . Hydraulic fracturing coupling model of rock mass based on extended finite element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 799-808.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YAO Yang-ping, HOU Wei. Basic mechanical behavior of soils and their elastoplastic modeling[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] XU Jin-ming, QIANG Pei, ZHANG Peng-fei. Texture analysis of photographs of silty clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] XIANG Tian-bing, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui, JIANG Quan, ZHANG Chuan-qing. Rock failure mechanism and true triaxial experimental study of specimens with single structural plane under three-dimensional stress[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] SHI Yu-ling, MEN Yu-ming, PENG Jian-bing, HUANG Qiang-bing, LIU Hong-jia. Damage test study of different types structures of bridge decks by ground-fissure[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] XIA Dong-zhou, HE Yi-bin, LIU Jian-hua. Study of damping property and seismic action effect for soil-structure dynamic interaction system[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] XU Su-chao, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui. Experimental study of skarn under uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading test and acoustic emission characteristics[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] ZHANG Li-ting, QI Qing-lan, WEI Jing HUO Qian, ZHOU Guo-bin. Variation of void ratio in course of consolidation of warping clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] ZHANG Qi-yi. Study of failure patterns of foundation under combined loading[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] YI Jun, JIANG Yong-dong, XUAN Xue-fu, LUO Yun, ZHANG Yu. A liquid-solid dynamic coupling modelof ultrasound enhanced coalbed gas desorption and flow[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] TAO Gan-qiang, YANG Shi-jiao, REN Feng-yu. Experimental research on granular flow characters of caved ore and rock[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .