Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S2): 563-574.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1606

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Measured data and numerical simulation analysis of shield tunneling in sand

LUO Guan-yong1, 2, ZHONG Miao1, 2, CAO Hong1, 2, PAN Hong1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China; 2. The State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China
  • Received:2021-09-21 Revised:2022-07-20 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978282), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2020A1515010583), the State Key Lab of Subtropical Building Science, South China University Of Technology (2022ZB21) and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Modern Civil Engineering Technology(2021B1212040003).

Abstract: Compared with other soil layers, the risk of shield tunneling in water-rich sand is greater, but the mechanism of sand deformation caused by shield tunneling is currently unclear. Relying on an electric power tunnel project in Guangzhou, this paper selects a typical water-rich sandy stratum section for high-frequency, close-range monitoring of stratum deformation caused by shield tunnel construction. The following understandings are obtained, which can be used as reference for similar projects. 1) In a water-rich environment, compared to in a homogeneous sand layer, in a combination of fine and coarse sands, the tunnel is more prone to seepage failure. Under this circumstance, the fine sand layer bears greater seepage force while being strongly supplied with water from the coarse sand layer, and the fine sand layer is thus very easy to be eroded or even hollowed out. 2) The ground deformation caused by uniform volume loss and local concentrated loss is quite different. In the case of uniform loss, because the arching effect is not as strong as the local loss, the disturbance range, surface settlement and horizontal displacement are all larger. The location of the maximum horizontal displacement is also closely related to the heterogeneity of the formation loss. When the formation loss is uniform, the maximum horizontal displacement on both sides of the tunnel occurs within the tunnel elevation range; but when the uneven loss (partial collapse of the tunnel top) occurs, the location of the maximum horizontal displacement will move up significantly. 3) The seepage force expands the range of stratum disturbance. 4) The stratum loss rate is severely affected by grouting. The vicinity of the tunnel is large, the ground surface is the smallest, and the soil above the tunnel tends to loosen.

Key words: shield construction, soil deformation, sand stratum, field monitor, numerical simulation

CLC Number: 

  • U455.43
[1] JIANG Fan, LIU Hua, YUE Qing, YANG Wen-shuang. Variation trend of soil pressure under cutting edges of the super large caisson during sinking stage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 431-442.
[2] ZHOU Hao, CHEN Guo-liang, HE Xiang, WU Jia-ming, ZHANG Rong-tang, YIN Da-wei, YUAN Kun-bin, WU Zhe, . Key technologies of building information model integration and simulation in geotechnical engineering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 443-453.
[3] DENG Peng-hai, LIU Quan-sheng, HUANG Xing, PAN Yu-cong, BO Yin, . Combined finite-discrete element numerical study on the buckling failure mechanism of horizontally layered soft rock mass [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 508-523.
[4] YUAN Wei, ZHONG Hui-ya, ZHU Yi, TANG Jia, HONG Jian-fei, WANG Ya-xiong, LIN Hang, WAN Ning, WANG An-li, . Determination method of slope critical failure state based on monitoring data fusion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 575-587.
[5] DING Yang, XIONG Ye, CHEN Zi-zi, WU Xiao-han, WANG Xiao-bo, . Field test and numerical simulation for dynamic characteristics of cast-in-place pile [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 640-646.
[6] WANG Xin-bo, WANG Lu-jun, ZHU Bin, WANG Peng, YUAN Si-min, CHEN Yun-min, . Experimental study of behavior of hydrate-bearing sediments during servo depressurization [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(9): 2360-2370.
[7] RUAN Bin, JI Han-wen, WANG Su-yang, HE Hong-jun, MIAO Yu. Seismic incident wave separation method based on array observation and numerical verification [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(9): 2615-2623.
[8] FAN Hao-bo, ZHOU Ding-kun, LIU Yong, SONG Yu-xiang, ZHU Zheng-guo, ZHU Yong-quan, GAO Xin-qiang, GUO Jia-qi, . Mechanical response characteristics of lining structure of pipeline karst tunnels in water-rich areas [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(7): 1884-1898.
[9] ZHANG Ge, CAO Ling, WANG Cheng-tang, . Development and application of elastic-plastic damage constitutive model considering softening characteristics of polycrystalline ice [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(7): 1969-1977.
[10] ZHANG Chan-qing, HE Feng-fei, JIANG Shun-hang, ZENG Zi-zhen, XIONG Feng, CHEN Jiang, . Vibration characteristics of super large centrifuge foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(7): 2025-2034.
[11] LI Ning, PAN Hang, ZHANG Mao-jian, ZHANG Hui-li, LI Xin-zhen, XU Jian-cong, . Influence of rainfall patterns on anti-seepage performance of capillary barrier covers [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(6): 1546-1556.
[12] LENG Wu-ming, DENG Zhi-long, XU Fang, ZHANG Qi-shu, DONG Jun-li, LIU Si-hui. A prestress loss model for subgrade considering creep effect of subgrade soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(6): 1671-1682.
[13] CHI Xiao-lou, YANG Ke, LIU Wen-jie, FU Qiang, WEI Zhen, . Study of caving pattern of regenerated roof in fully-mechanized slicing mining of steeply dipping coal seam [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(5): 1391-1400.
[14] QIAO Ya-fei, TANG Jie, GU Yun, DING Wen-qi, . Evolution mode of lateral pressure on the trench wall and disturbance analysis during construction of super-deep diaphragm wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(4): 1083-1092.
[15] HE Yong, HU Guang, ZHANG Zhao, LOU Wei, ZOU Yan-hong, LI Xing, ZHANG Ke-neng. Numerical simulation on the migration and transformation mechanism of hexavalent chromium in contaminated site [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(2): 528-538.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YAO Yang-ping, HOU Wei. Basic mechanical behavior of soils and their elastoplastic modeling[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] XU Jin-ming, QIANG Pei, ZHANG Peng-fei. Texture analysis of photographs of silty clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] XIANG Tian-bing, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui, JIANG Quan, ZHANG Chuan-qing. Rock failure mechanism and true triaxial experimental study of specimens with single structural plane under three-dimensional stress[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] SHI Yu-ling, MEN Yu-ming, PENG Jian-bing, HUANG Qiang-bing, LIU Hong-jia. Damage test study of different types structures of bridge decks by ground-fissure[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] XIA Dong-zhou, HE Yi-bin, LIU Jian-hua. Study of damping property and seismic action effect for soil-structure dynamic interaction system[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] XU Su-chao, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui. Experimental study of skarn under uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading test and acoustic emission characteristics[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] ZHANG Li-ting, QI Qing-lan, WEI Jing HUO Qian, ZHOU Guo-bin. Variation of void ratio in course of consolidation of warping clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] ZHANG Qi-yi. Study of failure patterns of foundation under combined loading[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] YI Jun, JIANG Yong-dong, XUAN Xue-fu, LUO Yun, ZHANG Yu. A liquid-solid dynamic coupling modelof ultrasound enhanced coalbed gas desorption and flow[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] TAO Gan-qiang, YANG Shi-jiao, REN Feng-yu. Experimental research on granular flow characters of caved ore and rock[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .