›› 2005, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 642-644.

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Classification of rockburst using support vector machine

ZHAO Hong-bo   

  1. Shaoxing University, Department of Civil Engineering, Shaoxing 312000, China
  • Received:2003-12-12 Online:2005-04-09 Published:2013-12-19

Abstract: Rockburst is a disaster occurred usually in deep mines. Because of poor understanding of the mechanism, it is very difficult to give accurate classification using deterministic mechanical methods. A new method, therefore, was proposed. It was to use support vector machine to represent nonlinear relationship between rockburst and its factors. This model was learned from case histories and then could be used fast classification of rockburst for similar conditions. The support vector machine models have been established .The models gave accurate classification for the novel conditions. The results show this method is scientific, reliable, and promising.

Key words: rockburst, classification, support vector machine

CLC Number: 

  • TU45
  • Please send e-mail to pingzhou3@126.com if you would like to read full paper in English for free. Parts of our published papers have English translations.
[1] ZHOU Hui, CHEN Jun, ZHANG Chuan-qing, ZHU Yong, LU Jing-jing, JIANG Yue, . Experimental study of the rockburst model material with low-strength and high-brittleness [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2039-2049.
[2] SU Guo-shao, YAN Si-zhou, YAN Zhao-fu, ZHAI Shao-bin, YAN Liu-bin, . Evolution characteristics of acoustic emission in rockburst process under true-triaxial loading conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1673-1682.
[3] LUO Dan-ni, SU Guo-shao, HE Bao-yu, . True triaxial test on rockburst of granites with different water saturations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1331-1340.
[4] YAN Jian, HE Chuan, WANG Bo, MENG Wei, . Influence of high geotemperature on rockburst occurrence in tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1543-1550.
[5] WANG Qi , SUN Hui-bin , JIANG Bei , GAO Song , LI Shu-cai , GAO Hong-ke, . A method for predicting uniaxial compressive strength of rock mass based on digital drilling test technology and support vector machine [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 1221-1228.
[6] ZHAO Fei, WANG Hong-jian, HE Man-chao, YUAN Guang-xiang, LUO Yao-wu, . Acoustic emission characteristics of granite specimens with different heights in rockburst tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 135-146.
[7] WANG Zhi-dong, LI Li-yun, CHEN Tao, LIU Bing-quan, . Study of energy release in model tests on pillar rockburst [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 177-185.
[8] ZHU Si-tao, JIANG Fu-xing, ZHU Hai-zhou, ZHANG Jun-jie, LIAN Hong-quan, HAN Guo-qing, . Study of mechanism of rockburst accident in heading face in high stress area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 337-343.
[9] LI Shu-cai, HE Peng, LI Li-ping, ZHANG Qian-qing, SHI Shao-shuai, XU Fei, LIU Hong-liang. Reliability analysis method of sub-classification of tunnel rock mass and its engineering application [J]. , 2018, 39(3): 967-376.
[10] XIANG Peng, JI Hong-guang, CAI Mei-feng, ZHANG Yue-zheng. Dynamic energy release mechanism and geometric scale feature of ejection rockburst source [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 457-466.
[11] SI Xue-feng, GONG Feng-qiang, LUO Yong, LI Xi-bing, . Experimental simulation on rockburst process of deep three-dimensional circular cavern [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 621-634.
[12] MA Chun-chi, LI Tian-bin, ZHANG Hang, WANG Jian-feng,. An evaluation and early warning method for rockburst based on EMS microseismic source parameters [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 765-774.
[13] MENG Wei, HE Chuan, WANG Bo, ZHANG Jun-bo, WU Fang-yin, XIA Wu-yang. Two-stage back analysis of initial geostress field in rockburst area based on lateral pressure coefficient [J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4191-4200.
[14] LIU Xin-jin, SU Guo-shao, FENG Xia-ting, YAN Liu-bin,YAN Zhao-fu, ZHANG Jie, LI Yan-fang. Dynamic prediction method of laboratory rockburst using sound signals [J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3573-3580.
[15] ZHANG Yan-bo, YANG Zhen, YAO Xu-long, LIANG Peng, TIAN Bao-zhu, SUN Lin,. Experimental study of rockburst early warning method based on acoustic emission cluster analysis and neural network identification [J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 89-98.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] TANG Ming-ming, WANG Zhi-yin, MA Lan-ping, ZENG Zhi-hua, ZHANG Zhi-pei. Study of design parameters of oil-gas pipeline traversing loess gully[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1314 -1318 .
[2] MEI Guo-xiong, LU Ting-hao, CHEN Hao, LI Zhi. True triaxial experiment of foundation pit considering initial stress[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2079 -2082 .
[3] LIAN Chuan-jie, XU Wei-ya, WANG Ya-jie, WANG Zhi-hua. Numerical simulation of entry performance supported by a new high strength and high pretension yieldable bolts[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2329 -2335 .
[4] LI Jun-cai,JI Guang-qiang,SONG Gui-hua,ZHANG Qiong,WANG Zhi-liang,YAN Xiao-min. In-situ measurement and analysis of sparse pile-raft foundation of high-rise building[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1018 -1022 .
[5] DENG Dong-ping,LI Liang,ZHAO Lian-heng. A new method of sliding surface searching for general stability of slope based on Janbu method[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 891 -898 .
[6] WU Jian,FENG Shao-kong,LI Hong-jie. Study of automatically extracting structural plane parameters from borehole images[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 951 -957 .
[7] WU Li-zhou,XU Qiang,HUANG Run-qiu. Analysis of freezing-thawing test process of unsaturated clay[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 1025 -1028 .
[8] WANG Lin , YANG Hai-peng , NIE Qing-ke. Numerical simulation for building settlements and its distribution characteristics using engineering analogy[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 485 -488 .
[9] LIU Tao-ying ,CAO Ping ,ZHANG Li-feng ,ZHAO Yan-lin ,FAN Xiang . Study of fracture damage evolution mechanism of compression-shear rock cracks under high seepage pressure[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1801 -1815 .
[10] HUANG Zhi-peng , DONG Yan-jun , LIAO Nian-chun , YIN Jian-min , ZHOU Jiang-ping . Deformation monitoring and analysis of left bank high slope at Jinping I hydropower station[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 235 -242 .