›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 1757-1766.

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Risk assessment of water or mud inrush of karst tunnels based on analytic hierarchy process

XU Zhen-hao1, LI Shu-cai1, LI Li-ping1, HOU Jian-gang2, SUI Bin1, SHI Shao-shuai1   

  1. 1. Research Center of Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China; 2. Bridge & Tunnel Co., Ltd., China First Highway Engineering Co., Ltd., Gaobeidian, Hebei 074000, China
  • Received:2010-06-08 Online:2011-06-10 Published:2011-06-21

Abstract: In order to control the construction risk of karst tunnels, through statistical and theoretical analyses of relevant engineering projects, controlling factors and factors’ weight of water or mud inrush risks of karst tunnels are studied based on analytic hierarchy process; and a three-stage risk assessment and management method is proposed for the evaluation and controlling of construction risk of karst tunnels. Factors’ weight analysis results show that unfavorable geology, geological prediction, formation lithology and groundwater level are the main control ingredients of water or mud inrush risk. Macroscopic geological precursory information, monitoring measurement, contact zones of dissolvable and insoluble rock, geographic and geomorphic conditions, tunnel excavation and supporting are the minor significant factors; microcosmic precursory information, attitude of rock formation, layer and interlayer fissures, surrounding rock mass classification are the least important elements. The three-stage risk assessment method includes preliminary, secondary and dynamic assessment of water or mud inrush risk. Preliminary assessment is the evaluation of risk surroundings (karst hydrogeological and engineering geological conditions), and it is carried out for the estimation of risk before the enactment of the construction program. Secondary assessment is the evaluation of risk surroundings and risk factors (construction factors), and it is actualized for the appraisal of construction organization plan pre construction. Dynamic assessment is the evaluation of risk surroundings, risk factors and feedback information of risk management; and it is brought into operation for dynamic risk assessment and management. The three-stage risk evaluation and controlling process can be instantly, effectively, and accurately used for the management of construction risk of karst tunnels, and to realize dynamically amending and governing of risk. The research results are successfully applied to Jigongling Tunnel on the line of Fanba Expressway; and it is of consultant significance for similar engineerings.

Key words: analytic hierarchy process, karst tunnel, risk of water or mud inrush, factors&rsquo, weight, three-stage assessment

CLC Number: 

  • U45
[1] YANG Dao-xue, ZHAO Kui, ZENG Peng, ZHUO Yu-long, . Numerical simulation of unknown wave velocity acoustic emission localization based on particle swarm optimization algorithm [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 494-502.
[2] CHEN Wu, ZHANG Guo-hua, WANG Hao, CHEN Li-biao, . Risk assessment of mountain tunnel collapse based on rough set and conditional information entropy [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3549-3558.
[3] QIU Jin-wei, PU He-fu, CHEN Xun-long, LÜ Wei-dong, LI Lei. Coupled analysis of self-weight consolidation and contaminant transport in confined disposal of contaminated sediments [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3090-3098.
[4] DENG Mao-lin, YI Qing-lin, HAN Bei, ZHOU Jian, LI Zhuo-jun, ZHANG Fu-ling, . Analysis of surface deformation law of Muyubao landslide in Three Gorges reservoir area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3145-3152.
[5] LIU Zong-hui, LIU Mao-mao, ZHOU Dong, LAN Ri-yan, WU Heng, WANG Ye-tian, . Recognition method of typical anomalies in karst tunnel construction based on attribute analysis of ground penetrating radar [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3282-3290.
[6] ZHU Yan-peng, DU Xiao-qi, YANG Xiao-hui, LI Hui-jun, . Research on utility tunnel foundation treated by compaction piles and post-work immersion test in self-weight collapsible loess area with large thickness [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 2914-2924.
[7] ZHANG Hai-ting, YANG Lin-qing, GUO Fang, . Solution and analysis of dynamic response for rigid buried pipe in multi-layered soil based on SBFEM [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2713-2722.
[8] GONG Wen-hui, ZHAO Xu-dong, QIU Jin-wei, LI Yi, YANG Han. Nonlinear analysis of one-dimensional consolidation of saturated clay including dead-weight effects and large strain [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2099-2107.
[9] PU He-fu, SONG Ding-bao, ZHENG Jun-jie, ZHOU Yang, YAN Jing, LI Zhan-yi. Non-linear self-weight consolidation model of saturated soft soil under large-strain condition [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1683-1692.
[10] ZHANG Wen-sheng, LUO Qiang, JIANG Liang-wei, LI Ang, . Reliability analysis of soil slope considering moment estimation bias using small sample geotechnical parameters [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 315-324.
[11] LIU Yang-yang, GUO Zeng-zhang, LI Yong-qiang, LI You-peng. Risk assessment model of highway slope based on entropy weight set pair analysis and vehicle laser scanning [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 131-141.
[12] YANG Qi, ZHANG You-yi, LIU Hua-qiang, QIN Hua,. Model test on load-failure of a foamed lightweight soil subgrade [J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3121-3129.
[13] LI Shu-cai, PAN Dong-dong, XU Zhen-hao, LI Li-ping, LIN Peng,. A model test on catastrophic evolution process of water inrush of a concealed karst cave filled with confined water [J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3164-3173.
[14] XIAO Guo-feng, CHEN Cong-xing. Simulation of progressive failure process and stability analysis method for rock block [J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3001-3010.
[15] LI Jian-peng, NIE Qing-ke, LIU Quan-sheng, YU Jun-chao,. Risk assessment method of karst ground collapse based on weight back analysis [J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1395-1400.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] WEI Li,CHAI Shou-xi,CAI Hong-zhou,WANG Xiao-yan,LI Min3,SHI Qian. Research on tensility of wheat straw for reinforced material[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 128 -132 .
[2] HUANG Qing-xiang, ZHANG Pei, DONG Ai-ju. Mathematical model of “arch beam” of thick sandy soil layer movement in shallow seam[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2722 -2726 .
[3] JING Zhi-dong, LIU Jun-xin. Experimental research on dynamic deformations of semi-rigid structures of subgrade bed-mudstone of red beds[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2116 -2121 .
[4] LIU Zheng-hong,LIAO Yan-hong,ZHANG Yu-shou. Preliminary study of physico-mechanical properties of Luanda sand[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 121 -126 .
[5] LEI Jin-bo,CHEN Cong-xin. Research on load transfer mechanism of composite foundation of rigid pile with cap based on hyperbolic model[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3385 -3391 .
[6] WANG Deng-ke,LIU Jian,YIN Guang-zhi,WEI Li-de. Research on influencing factors of permeability change for outburst-prone coal[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3469 -3474 .
[7] ZHANG Cheng-ping,ZHANG Ding-li,LUO Jian-jun,WANG Meng-shu,WU Jie-pu. Remote monitoring system applied to the construction of metro station undercrossing existing metro tunnel[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1861 -1866 .
[8] WANG Jun, CAO Ping, LI Jiang-teng, LIU Ye-ke. Analysis of stability of tunnel-slope with rheological medium under rainfall infiltration[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2158 -2162 .
[9] ZHANG Yuan, WAN Zhi-jun, KANG Jian-rong, ZHAO Yang-sheng. Analysis of stage characteristics of sandstone permeability under conditions of temperature and triaxial stress[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 677 -683 .
[10] ZHANG Xue-chan , GONG Xiao-nan , YIN Xu-yuan , ZHAO Yu-bo. Monitoring analysis of retaining structures for Jiangnan foundation pit of Qingchun road river-crossing tunnel in Hangzhou[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 488 -0494 .