›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 2642-2650.

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Engineering vulnerability assessment for bridges and tunnels harmed by debris flow hazards

XU Lin-rong, CHEN Shu-yang, CAO Lu-lai   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410004, China
  • Received:2013-05-25 Online:2014-09-10 Published:2014-09-16

Abstract: In order to advance debris flow loss assessment from macroeconomic evaluation to service for civil engineering, the concept of engineering vulnerability based on structural devastation extent of civil engineering infrastructures is put forward. However, for those engineering harmed by debris flow hazards, such as bridges and tunnels, it is insufficient to determine the actual disaster loss merely according to structural devastation extent. When the engineering function is completely lost but structure slightly damaged, its vulnerability can be underestimated. Besides, when the engineering function is fairly workable but structure severely damaged, its vulnerability can be overestimated. Therefore, on the basis of the conventional assessment of structural devastation extent, the influencing factors for bridges and tunnels’ function is introduced, such as hazard-affected characteristics, railway/highway ranking and restoration cost. Thus, the engineering vulnerability assessment method for bridges and tunnels harmed by debris flow hazards is proposed, considering both structural devastation and function loss. In the case study, the assessing results show that the insufficiency of the conventional structural assessment can be overcome by this method. This method extends and develops the concept of engineering vulnerability, which makes the assessment more comprehensive and credible. Hence, it is concluded that this method is of great significance to correctly predict and verify the disaster situation of bridges and tunnels harmed by debris flow hazard, to properly prepare the emergency plans or to initiate a quick response.

Key words: debris flow, engineering vulnerability, bridge and tunnel engineering, structural devastation, function loss

CLC Number: 

  • U 45
[1] HAN Zheng, SU Bin, LI Yan-ge, WANG Wei, WANG Wei-dong, HUANG Jian-ling, CHEN Guang-qi, . Smoothed particle hydrodynamic numerical simulation of debris flow process based on Herschel-Bulkley-Papanastasiou constitutive model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[2] WANG Dong-po, CHEN Zheng, HE Si-ming, CHEN Ke-jian, LIU Fa-ming, LI Ming-qing, . Physical model experiments of dynamic interaction between debris flow and bridge pier model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3363-3372.
[3] WU Feng-yuan, FAN Yun-yun, CHEN Jian-ping, LI Jun, . Simulation analysis of dynamic process of debris flow based on different entrainment models [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3236-3246.
[4] WANG You-biao, YAO Chang-rong, LIU Sai-zhi, LI Ya-dong, ZHANG Xun. Experimental study of debris flow impact forces on bridge piers [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 616-623.
[5] LI Zhao-hua, HU Jie, FENG Ji-li, GONG Wen-jun. Numerical simulation of debris flow based on visco-elastoplastic constitutive model [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 513-520.
[6] CHEN Xing-zhang, CHEN Hui, YOU Yong, LIU Jin-feng,. Experiment on distribution and influence factors of uplift pressure acting on bottom of debris flow check dam [J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3229-3236.
[7] DU Guo-liang, ZHANG Yong-shuang, YAO Xin, GUO Chang-bao, YANG Zhi-hua,. Formation mechanism analysis of Wulipo landslide-debris flow in Dujiangyan city [J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 493-501.
[8] HU Xie-wen, DIAO Ren-hui, LIANG Jing-xuan, LUO Gang, WEI Lai,. Prediction of the scope of Jiangkou gully debris flow hazard using CFX software [J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1689-1696.
[9] FEI Jian-bo, JIE Yu-xin, ZHANG Bing-yin, FU Xu-dong. Application of a three-dimensional yield criterion to granular flow modeling [J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1809-1817.
[10] YANG Jin-bing, CHEN Xing-zhang, WANG Hui, TIAN Xiao-ping, JIA Li-rong. An experimental study of relationship between fine grain content and permeability coefficient of debris flow deposits [J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3184-3190.
[11] JI Xian-jun , LIANG Ying , OU Guo-qiang , YANG Shun , WANG Jun , LU Gui-hong,. Numerical simulation and verification about viscous debris motion process on slope [J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2402-2408.
[12] ZENG Chao ,SU Zhi-man ,LEI Yu ,YU Jian,. An experimental study of the characteristics of impact forces between debris flow slurry and large-sized particles [J]. , 2015, 36(7): 1923-1930.
[13] HE Na , CHEN Ning-sheng , ZHU Yun-hua , YANG Jian-yuan , YANG Cheng-lin,. Experiment study of fractal feature and relationship between fractal dimension and permeability coefficient of gravelly soil in debris flow source area [J]. , 2014, 35(9): 2543-2548.
[14] ZHAO Yan-bo , YOU Yong , LIU Jin-feng , CHEN Xing-chang,. Study of gully bed erosion depth of viscous debris flow [J]. , 2014, 35(6): 1751-1755.
[15] SHAN Bo, CHEN Jian-ping, WANG Qing. Debris flow susceptibility analysis based on theories of minimum entropy and uncertainty measurement [J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1445-1454.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] WANG Gang, LI Shu-cai, WANG Ming-bin. Study of stability of anchoring jointed rockmass under seepage pressure[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2843 -2849 .
[2] LIU Yu-cheng,CAO Shu-gang,LIU Yan-bao. Discussion on some time functions for describing dynamic course of surface subsidence due to mining[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 925 -931 .
[3] JIE Yu-xin, YANG Guang-hua. Modification of elastoplastic models based on generalized potential theory[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 38 -42 .
[4] YANG Jian-min, ZHENG Gang. Classification of seepage failures and opinion to formula for check bursting instability in dewatering[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 261 -264 .
[5] ZHOU Hua,WANG Guo-jin1,,FU Shao-jun,ZOU Li-chun,CHEN Sheng-hong. Finite element analysis of foundation unloading and relaxation effects of Xiaowan Arch Dam[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1175 -1180 .
[6] YE Fei, ZHU He-hua, HE Chuan. Back-filled grouts diffusion model and its pressure to segments of shield tunnel[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1307 -1312 .
[7] LUO Qiang , WANG Zhong-tao , LUAN Mao-tian , YANG Yun-ming , CHEN Pei-zhen. Factors analysis of non-coaxial constitutive model’s application to numerical analysis of foundation bearing capacity[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 732 -0737 .
[8] WANG Yun-Gang ,ZHANG Guang ,HU Qi. Study of force characteristics of battered pile foundation[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 2184 -2190 .
[9] GONG Wei-ming, HUANG Ting, DAI Guo-liang. Experimental study of key parameters of high piled foundation for offshore wind turbine[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 115 -121 .
[10] WANG Cheng-bing. Laboratory and numerical investigation on failure process of tunnel constructed in homogeneous rock[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 103 -108 .