›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 821-826.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.03.026

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Prediction of dynamic subsidence of ground point under loose stratum based on two-factor time function

SUN Chuang1, 2, XU Nai-zhong1, 2, LIU Yi-xin3, LIU Gui1, 2 , GAO Chao1, 2   

  1. 1. Coal Mining & Designing Branch, China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China; 2. Coal Mining & Designing Department, Tiandi Science & Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing 100013, China; 3. Institute of Coal Safety and Technology, China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China
  • Received:2015-04-13 Online:2017-03-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (5160041082, 51404139).

Abstract: In this study, we studied the surface subsidence law and the shortcomings of predicting surface subsidence by Knothe time function model under loose formation conditions. To express the loose formation subsidence, a time impact factor c2 is introduced into the original time, and a two-factor time function model is developed. Theoretical analysis results indicate that although the two-factor time function has characteristics of slow convergence and strong adaptability to parameter change, it is not complete in accordance with the dynamic process of the surface subsidence. Hence, we improve the two-factor time function,and then verify the applicability of improved two-factor time function for three different thickness (i.e., thin, thick and extremely thick) of loose strata. The results show that the improved function can predict the whole dynamic process of ground point subsidence under the conditions of different thickness of loose strata. The results performed in the study can provide reference for coal mining under building, railway and water body.

Key words: two-factor time function, loose stratum, dynamic, subsidence prediction

CLC Number: 

  • TD 325

[1] QIAO Xiang-jin, LIANG Qing-guo, CAO Xiao-ping, WANG Li-li, . Research on dynamic responses of the portal in bridge-tunnel connected system [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[2] YAO Yu-wen, LIU Fang-cheng, BU Guo-bin, JING Li-ping, . Laboratory study on elastic dynamic mechanics of rubber-sand mixture by bender-extender element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2369-2379.
[3] HE Jing-bin, FENG Zhong-ju, DONG Yun-xiu, HU Hai-bo, LIU Chuang, GUO Sui-zhu, ZHANG Cong, WU Min, WANG Zhen, . Dynamic response of pile foundation under pile-soil-fault coupling effect in meizoseismal area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[4] YU Hai-tao, ZHANG Zheng-wei, LI Pan, . Improved equivalent response acceleration method for seismic design of underground structures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2401-2410.
[5] DU Wen-jie, SHENG Qian, FU Xiao-dong, TANG Hua, CHEN He, DU Yu-xiang, ZHOU Yong-qiang. Dynamic stability analysis and failure mechanism of Yanyang village landslide under earthquake [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[6] WANG Kang-yu, ZHUANG Yan, GENG Xue-yu, . Experimental study on critical dynamic stress of coarse-grained soil in railway subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1865-1873.
[7] GUO Xu-wei, YANG Xiao-qin, CHAI Shuang-wu. Optimization of the segmented Knothe function and its dynamic parameter calculation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2091-2097.
[8] ZHANG Ming-li, WEN Zhi, DONG Jian-hua, WANG De-kai, YUE Guo-dong, WANG Bin, GAO Qiang. Response of hydrothermal activity in different types of soil at ground surface to rainfall in permafrost region [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1549-1559.
[9] REN Yang, LI Tian-bin, LAI Lin. Centrifugal shaking table test on dynamic response characteristics of tunnel entrance slope in strong earthquake area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[10] HAN Jun-yan, LI Man-jun, ZHONG Zi-lan, XU Jing-shu, LI Li-yun, LAN Jing-yan, DU Xiu-li. Seismic response of soil under non-uniform excitation based on shaking table test of buried pipelines [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[11] WANG Li-an, ZHAO Jian-chang, HOU Xiao-qiang, LIU Sheng-wei, WANG Zuo-wei. Lamb problem for non-homogeneous saturated half-space [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1790-1798.
[12] WANG Kai-xing, DOU Lin-ming, PAN Yi-shan, OPARIN V N . Experimental study of incompatible dynamic response feature of block rock mass [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1227-1234.
[13] ZHANG Xue-dong, CAI Hong, WEI Ying-qi, ZHANG Zi-tao, LIANG Jian-hui, HU Jing. Characterization of the seismic behavior of tailings reservoir founded on soft soil using dynamic centrifuge tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1287-1294.
[14] FENG Li, DING Xuan-ming, WANG Cheng-long, CHEN Zhi-xiong. Shaking table model test on seismic responses of utility tunnel with joint [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
[15] LU Wei, ZHAO Dong, LI Dong-bo, MAO Xiao-fei. Analytical method for dynamic response of fully grouted anchorage system of rammed earth sites [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1377-1387.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!