Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 3236-3246.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0785

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Simulation analysis of dynamic process of debris flow based on different entrainment models

WU Feng-yuan1, 2, FAN Yun-yun3, CHEN Jian-ping2, LI Jun1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110168, China; 2. College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130012, China; 3. School of Resources & Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110819, China
  • Received:2018-05-07 Online:2019-08-12 Published:2019-08-26
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0801603), the Young Scholars of National Natural Science Foundation of China (41201007) and the Nurture Fund for Research Innovation of Shenyang Jianzhu University (CXPY2017016).

Abstract: Numerical simulation of the dynamic process of Nomash River debris flow was carried out using the continuous theory method in this study. Three different entrainment rate models were applied in the continuous theory model, and the HLLC approximate Riemann solution was used to calculate the interface flux of the control unit of the finite volume numerical discrete. Calculation results of disaster scope and motion time were in good agreement with the actual disaster situation, which verified the correctness and validity of the simulation. Then, the final accumulation depth, motion velocity and erosion depth were analyzed and discussed. The results showed that the average depth and maximum depth of final accumulation obtained using McDougall entrainment model were close to those measured. The maximum velocity obtained using the Medina entrainment model at each time was the largest, followed by the result of McDougall entrainment model and the result of Pitman entrainment model. The erosion depth distribution using McDougall erosion model was more continuous, and the maximum value of 8.1 m was close to the estimated value of 8 m. The erosion depth results obtained using Medina erosion model and Pitman erosion model were more dispersed, and their maximum values were 10.9 m and 8.6 m, respectively.

Key words: debris flow, entrainment of path material, dynamic process, model equation, numerical simulation

CLC Number: 

  • P 642.23
[1] MAO Hao-yu, XU Nu-wen, LI Biao, FAN Yi-lin, WU Jia-yao, MENG Guo-tao, . Stability analysis of an underground powerhouse on the left bank of the Baihetan hydropower station based on discrete element simulation and microseismic monitoring [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[2] SHI Lin-ken, ZHOU Hui, SONG Ming, LU Jing-jing, ZHANG Chuan-qing, LU Xin-jing, . Physical experimental study on excavation disturbance of TBM in deep composite strata [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[3] ZHANG Zhen, ZHANG Zhao, YE Guan-bao, WANG Meng, XIAO Yan, CHENG Yi, . Progressive failure mechanism of stiffened deep mixed column-supported embankment [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[4] SU Jie, ZHOU Zheng-hua, LI Xiao-jun, DONG Qing, LI Yu-ping, CHEN Liu. Discussion on determination of shear wave arrival time based on the polarization effect in downhole method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[5] YANG Gao-sheng, BAI Bing, YAO Xiao-liang, . Study of thawing and consolidation law of ice-rich embankment [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[6] SHENG Jian-long, HAN Yun-fei, YE Zu-yang, CHENG Ai-ping, HUANG Shi-bing, . Relative permeability model for water-air two-phase flow in rough-walled fractures and numerical analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 1048-1055.
[7] MA Qiu-feng, QIN Yue-ping, ZHOU Tian-bai, YANG Xiao-bin. Development and application of contact algorithms for rock shear fracture surface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[8] LI Kang, WANG Wei, YANG Dian-sen, CHEN Wei-zhong, QI Xian-yin , TAN Cai. Application of periodic oscillation method in low permeability measurement [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
[9] LI Fan-fan, CHEN Wei-zhong, LEI Jiang, YU Hong-dan, MA Yong-shang, . Study of mechanical properties of claystone based on plastic damage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[10] XIA Kun, DONG Lin, PU Xiao-wu, LI Lu. Earthquake response characteristics of loess tableland [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[11] GUO Yuan-cheng, LI Ming-yu, ZHANG Yan-wei, . Incremental analytical method for prestressed anchor and soil nail wall composite support system [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[12] YAN Guo-qiang, YIN Yue-ping, HUANG Bo-lin, ZHANG Zhi-hua, DAI Zhen-wei, . Formation mechanism and deformation characteristics of Jinjiling landslide in Wushan, Three Gorges Reservoir region [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[13] LIU Hong-yan. Influence of macroscopic and mesoscopic flaws on mechanical behavior of rock mass and slope stability [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[14] JIN Ai-bing, LIU Jia-we, ZHAO Yi-qing, WANG Ben-xin, SUN Hao, WEI Yu-dong, . Mechanical characteristics analysis of granite under unloading conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[15] HAN Zheng, SU Bin, LI Yan-ge, WANG Wei, WANG Wei-dong, HUANG Jian-ling, CHEN Guang-qi, . Smoothed particle hydrodynamic numerical simulation of debris flow process based on Herschel-Bulkley-Papanastasiou constitutive model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!