岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2252-2260.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0934

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

强度弱化条件下饱和砂土地基中桩−土 相互作用p-y曲线研究

张小玲1, 2,朱冬至1, 2,许成顺1, 2,杜修力1, 2   

  1. 1. 北京工业大学 建筑工程学院,北京 100124;2. 北京工业大学 城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-23 修回日期:2019-12-30 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2020-09-10
  • 作者简介:张小玲,女,1980年生,博士,副教授,主要从事土动力学方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51778020);国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目(No. 51421005)。

Research on p-y curves of soil-pile interaction in saturated sand foundation in weakened state

ZHANG Xiao-ling1, 2, ZHU Dong-zhi1, 2, XU Cheng-shun1, 2, DU Xiu-li1, 2   

  1. 1. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2019-05-23 Revised:2019-12-30 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778020) and the Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51421005).

摘要: 在地震荷载作用下,可液化土层中的桩基础往往会由于地基土体液化而发生破坏。在此过程中即使土体最终没有达到完全液化,但由于超孔隙水压力的存在,饱和砂土会发生强度弱化,也会导致土体对桩身水平抗力的降低。此时若不考虑超孔隙水压力对土抗力的影响,仍然采用API规范中的p-y曲线对桩基础进行设计,结果将偏于危险。针对这种情况,首先利用竖向?扭转双向耦合剪切仪对饱和砂土进行了循环扭剪动强度试验,研究了不同弱化状态下饱和砂土的动力特性和弱化参数;然后基于浅层处改进的土楔体理论模型推导极限土抗力公式,并结合深层处的绕桩流动破坏理论模型,得到了任意深度处不同孔压比下的极限土抗力,进而构造了不同弱化状态下饱和砂土地基中桩?土相互作用的p-y曲线。通过研究发现:表征土体强度弱化状态的孔压比对桩?土相互作用的极限土抗力的影响非常显著,孔压比越大,土体强度弱化程度越严重,饱和砂土的极限土抗力值就越小,即横向受荷桩对周围土体的作用随着土体强度弱化程度的增加而降低,反之则增大。

关键词: 桩?土相互作用, 超孔隙水压力, 弱化参数, p-y曲线

Abstract: Under seismic loading, the pile foundations in the liquefiable soil are often destroyed due to the liquefaction of foundation soil. In this process, even if the soil does not reach full liquefaction finally, the strength of saturated sand will be weakened due to the existence of the excess pore water pressure, which will also lead to the decrease of horizontal resistance force of soil. If the influence of excess pore water pressure on horizontal resistance force of soil is not considered, the pile foundations are still designed by adopting the p-y curves in the API standard, and the results will be more dangerous. In this paper, the dynamic cyclic torsional shear tests are carried out for the Fujian standard sands by employing the vertical-torsional coupling shear apparatus, and the dynamic characteristics and weakened parameters of saturated sands in different weakened states are studied. Then the formulas of ultimate soil resistance are derived based on the improved theoretical model of soil wedge at shallow layer. Combined with the theoretical model of flow failure around piles at deep layer, the ultimate soil resistances at different pore pressure ratios at any depth are obtained, and then the p-y curves of pile-soil interaction in saturated sand foundation in different weakened states are constructed. It can be found from the study that the pore pressure ratio, which characterizes the weakened state of soil, has a significant effect on the ultimate soil resistance in pile-soil interaction. With the increase of pore pressure ratio, the weakened degree of soil will be more serious, and the ultimate resistance of saturated sand is smaller. That is to say, the action of the lateral loaded pile on the surrounding soil decreases with the increase of soil weakened degree, and the vice versa.

Key words: pile-soil interaction, excess pore water pressure, weakened parameters, p-y curves

中图分类号: TU 279.7+6
[1] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[2] 田抒平, 王振钰, 张陈蓉, . 大直径单桩基础海上风机非线性共振特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 156-164.
[3] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[4] 谢森林, 胡安峰, 肖志荣, 汪美慧, 胡训健, 陈俞超, . 基于广义Voigt模型的半渗透边界隧道周围饱和软土固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2024-2036.
[5] 金丹丹, 鲁先东, 王炳辉, 施展, 张雷, . 冲击荷载下含夹层饱和砂土孔压变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1081-1091.
[6] 吴小锋, 张笛, 李星, 汪玉冰, 文凯, . 可液化场地桩基震后水平变形预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 77-86.
[7] 杨奇, 王晓雅, 聂如松, 陈琛, 陈缘正, 徐方, . 间歇循环荷载作用下饱和砂土累积塑性变形及孔压特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1671-1683.
[8] 陈平山, 吕卫清, 梁小丛, 周红星, 王婧, 马佳钧, . 含细粒珊瑚土抗液化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 337-344.
[9] 李双龙, 魏丽敏, 冯胜洋, 何群, 张开鑫, . 基于扩展Koppejan模型的被动桩−软土 时效性相互作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2602-2614.
[10] 朱彦鹏, 吴林平, 施多邦, 赵壮福, 吕向向, 段新国, . 基于Pasternak地基模型的非线性土抗力−桩 身侧向位移曲线在基坑支护桩中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2581-2591.
[11] 丁瑜, 贾羽, 王晅, 张家生, 陈晓斌, 罗昊, 张宇, . 颗粒级配及初始干密度对路基翻浆冒泥特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2539-2549.
[12] 冯忠居, 孟莹莹, 张聪, 赖德金, 朱继新, 林路宇, . 强震作用下液化场地群桩动力响应及p-y曲线[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1289-1298.
[13] 黄福云, 周志明, 庄一舟, 刘帆, 刘名琦, . 整体桥高性能混凝土桩−土相互作用试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 591-601.
[14] 苏新斌, 廖晨聪, 刘世奥, 张璐璐, . 基于预制滑动面的饱和黏土−结构物界面强度特性 三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2852-2860.
[15] 尹小卡, 杜思义, 王涛涛. 砂土液化与水泥粉煤灰碎石桩施工参数 关系的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2518-2524.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!