岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 390-400.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0851

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

玄武岩纤维增强复合材料在高边坡防护中的 振动台试验研究

赖天文1,雷浩1, 2,武志信3,吴红刚2   

  1. 1. 兰州交通大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730070;2. 中铁西北科学研究院有限公司,甘肃 兰州 730030; 3. 甘肃省交通规划勘察设计院股份有限公司,甘肃 兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-19 修回日期:2020-11-12 出版日期:2021-02-10 发布日期:2021-02-09
  • 通讯作者: 武志信,男,1993年生,硕士,工程师,主要从事岩土与边坡工程方面的研究。E-mail:1169697283@qq.com E-mail:376234629@qq.com
  • 作者简介:赖天文,男,1968年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事岩土与边坡工程方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划资助项目(No. 2018YFC1504901,No. 2018YFC1504903);云南省交通运输厅(云交科教(2017)37号-(1))

Shaking table test study on basalt fiber reinforced plastics in high slope protection

LAI Tian-wen1, LEI Hao1, 2, WU Zhi-xin3, WU Hong-gang2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China; 2. Northwest Research Institute Co. Ltd. of CREC, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China; 3. Gansu Transportation Planning Survey and Design Institute Co. Ltd., Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China
  • Received:2020-06-19 Revised:2020-11-12 Online:2021-02-10 Published:2021-02-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1504901, 2018YFC1504903) and the Yunnan Provincial Department of Transportation (Yunjiao Science and Education (2017) 37-1).

摘要: 在地震烈度较低时,钢锚索可以很好地限制坡体变形,起到良好的边坡支护效果。但是在强震条件下,常规的锚索难以发挥其锚固作用,最终导致锚固失效破坏,常会引发边坡失稳破坏的现象,且在地下水等腐蚀性物质的作用下,常会造成钢锚索的锈蚀问题。鉴于此,通过大型振动台试验,对新型玄武岩纤维增强复合材料(basalt fiber reinforced plastics,简称BFRP)加固边坡及无支护边坡的动力响应进行了对比研究,旨在为高边坡加固中BFRP锚索的动力合理性设计提供科学依据。研究结果表明:相较于BFRP锚索支护边坡而言,无支护边坡在地震波加载过程中具有明显的变形阶段,主要可划分为弹性阶段、塑性阶段、塑性增强阶段以及破坏阶段,且当输入波峰值小于0.2g时,BFRP锚索支护边坡与无支护边坡均可处于弹性状态;BFRP锚索支护边坡的加速度峰值均要大于无支护边坡的加速度峰值,表明相较于无支护边坡而言,BFRP锚索可有效提高边坡的刚度;同一工况的地震波作用下,无支护边坡中各测点位移谱值均要大于BFRP锚索支护边坡对应测点的位移谱值,表明BFRP锚索用于边坡支护工程中时,可以很好地限制坡体变形,有利于提高坡体的抗震性能。

关键词: 高边坡, 振动台试验, BFRP锚索, 加速度, 位移谱

Abstract: In general, the steel anchor cable can effectively reduce the deformation of the slope body, and is useful for slope reinforcement when the seismic intensity is low. However, the anchored rock mass deforms excessively under strong earthquake conditions, and conventional prestressed anchor cable cannot sustain the large deformation, which leads to the catastrophic slope instability and failure. Additionally, the corrosion of steel anchor cable often occurs under the groundwater containing corrosive substances. In view of this, the dynamic response of the slope reinforced using the new basalt fiber reinforced plastics (BFRP) and the unsupported slope was compared through the large-scale shaking table tests, aiming to provide a scientific basis for the dynamic rational design of BFRP anchor cables for reinforcement of high slopes. The result shows that: compared with the slope supported by BFRP, the unsupported slope has obvious deformation stages during seismic loading, which can be divided into elastic stage, plastic stage, plastic reinforcement stage, and failure stage. When the peak value of input wave is less than 0.2g, both the slope supported by BFRP anchor cable and the unsupported slope are in elastic state. In addition, the peak acceleration value of the slope supported by BFRP anchor cable is greater than that of the unsupported slope, which indicates that the BFRP anchor cable can effectively improve the rigidity of the slope. Under the action of seismic wave in the same condition, the displacement spectrum value of each measured point in the unsupported slope is greater than that of the corresponding measured point in the slope supported by BFRP anchor cable, which indicates that the BFRP anchor cable can reduce the deformation and improve the seismic performance of the slope in the slope supporting engineering.

Key words: high slope, shaking table test, BFRP anchor cable, acceleration, displacement spectrum

中图分类号: TU 435
[1] 董源, 胡英国, 刘美山, 李庚泉, 马晨阳. 均质岩石高边坡开挖爆破累积损伤的演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2929-2942.
[2] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[3] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[4] 杨艳霜, 闫磊, 张占荣, 刘永莉, 崔臻, 彭剑承, 亢兆鹏, . 基于三相孔隙介质模型的地震动传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1109-1121.
[5] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[6] 宋二波, 姚仰平, 牛玺荣, . 基于加速度峰值的填土智能压实质量评价方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3054-3064.
[7] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[8] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[9] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[10] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[11] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 潘申鑫, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 地震作用下桩板墙-锚索组合支护基覆型边坡的动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[12] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[13] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[14] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 陈虹羽, 郭玉丰, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 基于变形的降雨后地震基覆型边坡劣化特性与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1789-1802.
[15] 陶志刚, 丰于翔, 赵易, 张晓宇, 何满潮, 雷啸天, . 穿断层隧道NPR锚索支护体系抗震特性振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!