岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 735-745.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1298

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

平移模式下刚性挡土墙三维被动滑裂面的确定与土压力计算方法研究

石峰,卢坤林,尹志凯   

  1. 合肥工业大学 土木与水利工程学院,安徽 合肥 230009
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-27 修回日期:2021-01-26 出版日期:2021-03-11 发布日期:2021-03-17
  • 通讯作者: 卢坤林,男,1980年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要研究方向为岩土工程、防灾减灾工程、地质工程、交通工程。E-mail: lukunlin@hfut.edu.cn E-mail:903909411@qq.com
  • 作者简介:石峰,男,1994年生,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为岩土工程和地下工程
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省自然科学基金项目(No.1508085QE87)。

Determination of three-dimensional passive slip surface of rigid retaining walls in translational failure mode and calculation of earth pressures

SHI Feng, LU Kun-lin, YIN Zhi-kai   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, China
  • Received:2020-08-27 Revised:2021-01-26 Online:2021-03-11 Published:2021-03-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by Anhui Science Foundation(1508085QE87).

摘要: 挡土墙后三维被动滑裂面的空间形态难以确定。基于数值模拟,取墙?土接触面摩擦角比值δ/? = 0(δ为墙?土接触面摩擦角,?为土体内摩擦角),采用薄板光顺样条函数搜索出不同土体内摩擦角下挡土墙端部三维滑裂面,类比地基承载力破坏对不同土体内摩擦角下挡土墙端部三维滑裂面进行函数方程的拟合,拟合效果较好,并归纳总结挡土墙端部三维滑裂面方程。在刚性挡土墙平移模式、墙背直立、填土水平且为无黏性土、δ/? = 0等条件下,基于挡土墙端部三维滑裂面方程,求出三维滑裂面的体积。通过力学分析推导了一种三维被动土压力计算方法,并对该方法进行了验证分析。分析结果表明:相较于Soubra被动土压力系数,计算方法得出的三维土压力系数更加接近数值模拟被动土压力系数。三维计算被动土压力系数和朗肯被动土压力系数在挡土墙长深比小于4的时候有明显的差异。随着挡土墙的长深比的增大和土体内摩擦角的减小,三维计算被动土压力系数趋向朗肯被动土压力系数,三维计算被动土压力合力作用点的位置趋向朗肯被动土压力合力作用点位置。

关键词: 刚性挡土墙, 平移模式, 数值模拟, 滑裂面, 被动土压力, 计算方法

Abstract: It is usually difficult to determine the spatial form of three-dimensional passive slip surfaces behind retaining walls. Based on numerical simulation, this paper assumes friction angle ratio of the wall-soil contact surface to be zero (δ/? = 0), and uses the thin-plate smoothing spline function to search for the three-dimensional slip surface at the end of retaining wall under different internal friction angles of soil mass. By analogy with the failure of foundation bearing capacity, an equation is proposed to curve fit the three-dimensional slip surface, and the equation for three-dimensional slip surface at the end of the retaining wall is summarized. For translational failure mode of rigid retaining walls with upright wall back, horizontal filling level and non-cohesive soil, δ/? = 0, the volume of sliding body behind the wall is calculated based on the three-dimensional slip surface equation. The calculation of three-dimensional passive earth pressure is deduced, and verification is carried out. The results are obtained as follows: (1)Compared with the Soubra passive earth pressure coefficient, the three-dimensional earth pressure coefficient obtained by the proposed method in this paper is closer to the numerical simulation result; (2)There is a significant difference between the three-dimensional passive earth pressure coefficient and Rankine passive earth pressure coefficient when the length-to-depth ratio of the wall is less than 4.0. As the length-to-depth ratio increases and the soil internal friction angle decreases, the three-dimensional passive earth pressure coefficient reduces to the Rankine’ value, and the position of the three-dimensional passive earth pressure resultant action point tends to be the position of the Rankine’s point.

Key words: rigid retaining wall, translational failure mode, numerical simulation, slip surface, passive earth pressure

中图分类号: TU432
[1] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[3] 王长虹, 蔡德雍, 胡子轩, 杨天笑. 扰动状态下束浆挤扩桩抗拔机制与计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2980-2994.
[4] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[5] 陈志波, 陈峰, 翁洋, 曹光伟, 曾旭明, 潘生贵, 杨辉, . 考虑土塞效应的大直径钢管桩竖向承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2224-2236.
[6] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[7] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[8] 钟祖良, 杜传烨, 刘新荣, 李超, . 岩石顶管穿越深大断层破碎带摩阻力 计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 943-954.
[9] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[10] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[11] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[12] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[13] 许国庆, 黄高翔, 王协康, 罗登泽, 李洪涛, 姚强, . 新型弧形聚能爆破作用下的岩石破裂演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[14] 王帅, 王豫徽, 王玲, 李佳祺, 赵梓皓, 庞凯旋, . 基于晶体模型的岩石孔隙结构与矿物组成对裂纹扩展影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[15] 杨立. 平板载荷试验数值分析及承载力判定标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!