岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1230-1244.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1568

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

煤层钻孔降倾-控变-耗能防冲机制试验研究

王爱文1, 2,高乾书1,潘一山1, 2   

  1. 1. 辽宁工程技术大学 力学与工程学院,辽宁 阜新 123000;2. 辽宁工程技术大学 冲击地压研究院,辽宁 阜新 123000
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-19 修回日期:2020-12-21 出版日期:2021-05-11 发布日期:2021-05-07
  • 通讯作者: 高乾书,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事煤矿动力灾害方面的研究工作。E-mail:lynngqs@163.com E-mail:waw_lnt@126.com
  • 作者简介:王爱文,男,1982年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事煤矿动力灾害方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51974150);国家重点研发计划项目(No. 2017YFC0804208);2018年新疆维吾尔自治区天池百人计划(柔性人才)支撑项目。

Experimental study of rock burst prevention mechanism of bursting liability reduction-deformation control-energy dissipation based on drillhole in coal seam

WANG Ai-wen1, 2, GAO Qian-shu1, PAN Yi-shan1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Mechanics and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123000, China; 2. Research Institute of Rock Burst, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123000, China
  • Received:2020-10-19 Revised:2020-12-21 Online:2021-05-11 Published:2021-05-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(51974150), the National Key R & D program of China (2017YFC0804208) and the 2018 Tianchi Hundred Talents Program (Flexible Talents) Support Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.

摘要: 对预制钻孔试样开展单轴压缩试验,采用声发射(acoustic emission,简称AE)及数字图像相关(digital image correlation,简称DIC)监测技术探究多列多排布置钻孔试样的力学响应特征,分析钻孔对试样冲击倾向性、变形破坏及能量积聚与释放的影响规律。试验结果表明:煤层钻孔具有降低煤体冲击倾向、引导和控制煤体变形、增加变形能耗散的作用。(1)钻孔试样的强度较完整试样显著衰减,且随钻孔数增多,应力峰前弹性模量、应力峰值、冲击能量指数逐渐降低,冲击倾向性减弱。钻孔提升了AE事件的活动强度,但降低了高能量事件的占比。(2)钻孔布置方式改变了试样的破裂模式。完整试样由其表面中部形成应变局部化区域,并以该区域为弱面发生最终破裂;单列多排钻孔试样在钻孔上下侧起裂,产生局部化带,并向上下延伸形成宏观裂隙;双列多排钻孔试样在同排钻孔间的岩桥内起裂,然后垂直钻孔间岩桥内的裂隙进一步发育,最终形成纵横及斜交的宏观裂隙。钻孔展现出诱导试样提升垂直钻孔方向变形、约束平行钻孔方向变形、增强垂直方向变形、减小体积变形的空间效应。(3)钻孔能够降低变形能密度增长速率UV及变形能密度峰值Umax,同时延缓破坏时刻变形能的释放速率URV,且钻孔数越多,变形能密度峰值Umax及释放速率URV降低幅值越大。

关键词: 钻孔卸压, 冲击地压, 冲击倾向性, 变形特征, 能量耗散

Abstract: Uniaxial compression experiments were carried out on prefabricated borehole samples. Acoustic emission (AE) and digital image correlation (DIC) monitoring technology were applied to explore the mechanical response characteristics of samples arranged in multiple rows and lines, and analyze the influence of the drillhole on the bursting liability, deformation and failure, accumulation and release of energy of coal samples. The results show that, destressing drillhole in coal seam could reduce the bursting liability, control the deformation and increase the deformation energy dissipation of samples. Compared with an intact sample, the strength of the samples with drillhole was significantly attenuated, and as the number of drilling rows increased, the pre-peak elastic modulus, peak stress, and the bursting energy index KE gradually decreased, and the bursting liability was reduced. Destressing drillhole could increase the activity intensity of AE events and reduce the proportion of high-energy events. The layout of the destressing drillhole caused change of the fracture mode of the samples. A strain localization area generates from the middle on the sample surface of the intact samples, and the final fracture occurs in this area as the weak surface. For the samples with single row and multiple lines of drillhole arrangement, cracks occur on the upper and lower sides of drillholes, forming a localization zone, which extend up and down to form macroscopic cracks. For the samples with double rows and multiple lines drillhole arrangement, cracks easily occur in the rock bridge between the same row of drillholes, and then the cracks in the rock bridge between the vertical drillholes further develope, and finally form the vertical and horizontal and oblique macroscopic cracks. Morevoer, the drillhole in sample could increase the vertical drilling direction (x-direction) deformation, reduce the parallel drilling direction (y-direction) deformation, enlarge the vertical direction (z-direction) deformation, and reduce the volume deformation. The drillholes could reduce the growth UV and peak value Umax of deformation energy density, and delayed the release rate URV of deformation energy at the moment of failure. When drillhole number is greater, the reduction amplitude of the peak deformation energy density Umax and the release rate URV are greater.

Key words: drillhole pressure relief, rock burst, bursting liability, deformation characteristics, energy dissipation

中图分类号: TD 325
[1] 兰斌鹏, 王延平, 王卫国, 王义军, 赵跃, . 拉桩支护结构变形及工作机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 551-562.
[2] 谭健, 刘学生, 耿艳峰, 付彪, 王洪磊, 许珂, . 防冲钻机钻测智能化试验平台研制及初步应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 673-684.
[3] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[4] 徐东, 高明仕, 郑锐, . 同采工作面厚硬顶板破断诱冲机制及防控技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3219-3233.
[5] 郑可跃, 施成华, 娄义黎, 贾朝军, 雷明锋, 杨益, . 深部高地应力隧道开挖卸荷围岩能量计算方法及演化机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 165-177.
[6] 王磊, 杨震宇, 陈礼鹏, 王勇, 张帅, 王安铖, 李伟利, . 不同超临界CO2浸蚀时间后冲击煤体能量演化与破坏特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2251-2262.
[7] 王智德, 钱梦凡, 李杰, 司莹莹, 江俐敏, . 高应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1917-1928.
[8] 张杰, 聂如松, 黄茂桐, 谭永长, 李亚峰, . 道砟嵌入路基土三轴试验及离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1720-1730.
[9] 李利萍, 胡学锦, 潘一山, 李明会, . 煤的冲击倾向性对深部煤岩界面超低摩擦效应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1633-1642.
[10] 蒋中明, 石兆丰, 杨雪, 田湘, 肖喆臻, 刘琛智, 黄湘宜, . 聚氨酯类聚合物砂浆−混凝土界面黏结性能与变形特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3545-3554.
[11] 贾鹏, 郤保平, 李晓科, 解瑾, 蔡佳豪, 高鹏利, . 花岗岩非稳态传热破坏过程能量演变规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3013-3023.
[12] 高明仕, 俞鑫, 徐东, 贺永亮, 赵世帆, . 基于冲能吸能平衡效应的冲击地压巷道分级支护研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 38-48.
[13] 姜明归, 孙伟, 李金鑫, 樊锴, 刘增, . 冲击荷载下全尾砂胶结充填体断裂特性与能耗特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 186-196.
[14] 赵光明, 刘之喜, 孟祥瑞, 张若飞, 顾清恒, 戚敏杰, . 真三轴循环主应力作用下砂岩能量演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1875-1890.
[15] 王磊, 张帅, 刘怀谦, 陈礼鹏, 朱传奇, 李少波, 王安铖, . 冲击荷载下含瓦斯煤能量耗散及损伤破坏规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1901-1915.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!