岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 1961-1970.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1648

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

透水管桩现场试验光纤监测与承载性能研究

王静1,肖涛2,朱鸿鹄1,梅国雄2,刘拯源1,魏广庆3   

  1. 1. 南京大学 地球科学与工程学院,江苏 南京 210023;2. 广西大学 土木建筑工程学院,广西 南宁 530004; 3. 苏州南智传感科技有限公司,江苏 苏州 215123
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-04 修回日期:2021-03-29 出版日期:2021-07-12 发布日期:2021-07-19
  • 通讯作者: 朱鸿鹄,男,1979年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地质工程、岩土力学方面的教学和研究工作。E-mail: zhh@nju.edu.cn E-mail:wangjing@smail.nju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王静,男,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土工程监测和桩−土相互作用研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51878185,No. 41722209);国家重点研发计划课题(No. 2018YFC1505104)。

Study on bearing capacity of permeable pipe pile by field optical fiber monitoring

WANG Jing1, XIAO Tao2, ZHU Hong-hu1, MEI Guo-xiong2, LIU Zheng-yuan1, WEI Guang-qing3   

  1. 1. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 3. Suzhou Nanzee Sensing Technology, Ltd., Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123, China
  • Received:2020-11-04 Revised:2021-03-29 Online:2021-07-12 Published:2021-07-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878185, 41722209) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1505104).

摘要: 在软土地基中设置透水管桩可以加快沉桩引起的超静孔隙水的消散速率,进而加速桩周土的固结。目前,国内外对透水管桩承载力和透水性能的模型试验和数值模拟研究较多,但深入探究桩基承载力时间效应和荷载传递规律的现场试验研究较少。通过基于光纤布拉格光栅(FBG)的现场静载试验,研究了软土地基中透水管桩桩身应变分布及内力传递规律,并分析了桩身不同位置处桩?土界面超孔隙水压力随时间的变化规律与桩基承载力时间效应的关系。试验结果表明:沉桩结束前期,透水管桩的单桩竖向抗压承载力增长率较高,并且随时间逐渐降低;试验场地条件下,沉桩后10 d内透水管桩承载力的提高主要来源于桩侧摩阻力,10~24 d内桩端阻力对桩基承载力提高的贡献明显增加;桩?土界面的超孔压沿桩深度增加,随着桩端附近超孔压加速消散,土体有效应力增大,桩侧摩阻力和桩端阻力也随之增大。研究成果对软土地基中透水管桩的设计和施工具有一定的指导意义。

关键词: 透水管桩, 光纤布拉格光栅(FBG), 承载性能, 桩基内力, 超孔隙水压力

Abstract: Permeable pipe piles are set in the soft soil foundation to accelerate the dissipation rate of excess pore water pressure induced by pile driving and then to accelerate the consolidation of soil around the pile. At present, there are many studies, including model tests and numerical simulation, on the bearing capacity and permeability performance of permeable pipe piles. However, few field tests have been conducted to deeply study the time effect of bearing capacity and load transfer law of permeable pipe piles. Based on the fiber Bragg grating (FBG) technology, the static load tests were carried out to study the strain distribution and internal force transfer of the permeable pipe pile in soft soil foundation. Meanwhile, the relationship between the variation of excess pore water pressure of the pile-soil interface with time at different positions of the pile body and the time effect of bearing capacity of the permeable pipe pile was analyzed. The test results showed that at the early stage of pile driving, the growth rate of bearing capacity of a single permeable pipe pile under increased vertical loads was higher, and then gradually decreased with time. Under the test site conditions, the improvement of the bearing capacity of the permeable pipe pile within 10 days was mainly attributed to the pile side friction, whereas the pile tip resistance made more contribution to the improvement of bearing capacity within 10-24 days. The excess pore water pressure of the pile-soil interface increased along with the depth of the pile. With the rapid dissipation of excess pore water pressure near the pile tip, the effective stress of soil gradually increased, and the pile side friction and pile tip resistance also increased. This study provides an improved insight into the design and construction of permeable pipe piles in soft soil foundation.

Key words: permeable pipe pile, fiber Bragg grating (FBG), bearing capacity, internal force of pile, excess pore water pressure

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[2] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[3] 谢森林, 胡安峰, 肖志荣, 汪美慧, 胡训健, 陈俞超, . 基于广义Voigt模型的半渗透边界隧道周围饱和软土固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2024-2036.
[4] 金丹丹, 鲁先东, 王炳辉, 施展, 张雷, . 冲击荷载下含夹层饱和砂土孔压变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1081-1091.
[5] 凌造, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 刘春林, 李波, 苏定立, . 非挤土嵌岩预应力高强度混凝土管桩的桩端承载性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 97-107.
[6] 杨奇, 王晓雅, 聂如松, 陈琛, 陈缘正, 徐方, . 间歇循环荷载作用下饱和砂土累积塑性变形及孔压特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1671-1683.
[7] 陈平山, 吕卫清, 梁小丛, 周红星, 王婧, 马佳钧, . 含细粒珊瑚土抗液化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 337-344.
[8] 王卫东, 王萌, 吴江斌, . 静钻根植桩扩底桩端极限承载性能的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3091-3098.
[9] 丁瑜, 贾羽, 王晅, 张家生, 陈晓斌, 罗昊, 张宇, . 颗粒级配及初始干密度对路基翻浆冒泥特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2539-2549.
[10] 苏新斌, 廖晨聪, 刘世奥, 张璐璐, . 基于预制滑动面的饱和黏土−结构物界面强度特性 三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2852-2860.
[11] 尹小卡, 杜思义, 王涛涛. 砂土液化与水泥粉煤灰碎石桩施工参数 关系的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2518-2524.
[12] 任连伟, 任军洋, 孔纲强, 刘汉龙, . 冷热循环下PHC能量桩热力响应 和承载性能现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 529-536.
[13] 侯振坤, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 黎剑华, 张树文, 徐晓斌, 刘春林, . 随钻跟管桩竖向承载性能原位试验 与室内物理模拟试验对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 419-429.
[14] 刘春林, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 岳云鹏, 侯振坤, 陈航, . 考虑桩底沉渣的随钻跟管桩竖向承载 特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 177-185.
[15] 张小玲, 朱冬至, 许成顺, 杜修力, . 强度弱化条件下饱和砂土地基中桩−土 相互作用p-y曲线研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2252-2260.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!