岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 1175-1186.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1441

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于主应力迹线分层的有限土体土压力计算

刘新喜,李彬,王玮玮,贺程,李松   

  1. 长沙理工大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410114
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-26 修回日期:2022-01-13 出版日期:2022-05-11 发布日期:2022-05-02
  • 通讯作者: 王玮玮,男,1986年生,博士,讲师,主要从事挡土墙土压力方面的研究。E-mail:12013032@hnist.edu.cn E-mail:liuxinxi1963@126.com
  • 作者简介:刘新喜,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土体稳定性方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51674041);湖南省研究生科研创新项目(No. CX20200839)

Calculation of active earth pressure of finite soil based on layered principal stress trajectory

LIU Xin-xi, LI Bin, WANG Wei-wei, HE Cheng, LI Song   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, China
  • Received:2021-08-26 Revised:2022-01-13 Online:2022-05-11 Published:2022-05-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51674041) and the Research and Innovation Program for Postgraduates in Hunan Province(CX20200839).

摘要: 为了研究挡墙后有限土体的主动土压力,以墙后无黏性土体为研究对象,假定破裂面为通过墙踵的平面,且在挡墙平动模式下,墙后土体形成圆弧形小主应力拱。采用沿小主应力迹线分层的方法,将挡墙后土体划分为若干个圆弧形曲线薄层单元,考虑了单元体上下表面应力分布的不均匀性,提出了一种有限土体挡墙主动土压力计算方法,给出了主动土压力合力及其作用点高度的表达式,并验证了该方法的正确性。研究结果表明:采用曲线薄层单元法可以准确考虑单元体复杂的受力情况,能更好地反映挡墙后有限土体主动土压力的变化规律;有限填土时主动土压力沿墙高 呈非线性分布,土压力先随着土体深度增加呈单调递增趋势,然后在接近墙底位置处呈单调递减趋势。分析参数敏感性时取不同土体宽高比与墙背粗糙程度对挡墙主动土压力分布及合力作用点高度进行分析,结果表明:随着土体宽高比n的增大,主动土压力值逐渐增大,土压力分布曲线非线性越来越明显,合力作用点高度逐渐降低且恒大于 。当 0.71时,均趋于稳定。可将 0.71作为有限土体与半无限土体的临界宽高比。随着摩擦角 的增大,主动土压力值逐渐减小,土压力分布曲线非线性越来越明显,合力作用点高度逐渐增大且恒大于 。

关键词: 挡墙, 有限土体, 主动土压力, 小主应力迹线, 曲线薄层单元法

Abstract: To study the active earth pressure of finite soil behind the retaining wall, the cohesionless soil behind the wall is taken as the research object. The fracture surface is assumed as the plane passing through the heel of the wall, and in the translational mode of the retaining wall, the soil behind the retaining wall forms an arc-shaped small principal stress arch. The soil behind the retaining wall is divided into several curve thin-layer elements by the stratification method along the small principal stress. Considering the inhomogeneity of stress distribution on the upper and lower surface of the element, a calculation method is proposed for the active earth pressure of finite soil retaining wall. The expressions of active earth pressure resultant force and the height of its action point are given, and the correctness of this method is verified. The results show that the curve thin-layer element method can accurately consider the complex stress condition of the element, and can better reflect the variation law of the active earth pressure of finite soil behind the retaining wall. The active earth pressure shows a nonlinear distribution along the wall height H, it firstly increases with the soil depth increasing, then decreases monotonically near the bottom of the wall. In parameter sensitivity analysis, the distribution of active earth pressure of retaining wall and the height of combined force applied point are analyzed with different width-height ratios of soil and wall back roughness. The results show that with the increase of width-height ratio n, the active earth pressure gradually increases, the curve of earth pressure distribution becomes more and more nonlinear, the height of resultant force application point gradually decreases, and it is always greater than . It tends to be stable when n is greater than 0.71, so 0.71 can be assumed as the critical width-height ratio of finite soil and semi-infinite soil. The active earth pressure decreases gradually with the increase of the frictional angle ; the curve of earth pressure distribution becomes more and more nonlinear, the height of resultant force application point increases gradually and is always greater than .

Key words: retaining wall, finite soil, active earth pressure, small principal stress trajectory, curve thin layer element

中图分类号: TU 432
[1] 潘申鑫, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 刘先峰, 何梓雷, 曹丽君, 周诗广, . 高速铁路整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙地震作用下服役性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 519-530.
[2] 姚嘉楠, 徐长节, 迟民良, 王艳萍, 习跃来, 王伟锋, 冯国辉, 孙佳政, . RBT模式下刚性挡墙非极限主动土压力的离散元模拟及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 640-652.
[3] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[4] 张振光, 徐杰, 李海祥, . 考虑中间主应力的非饱和土竖井主动土压力滑移线解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3045-3053.
[5] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[6] 张振波, 李秉欣, 杨茜, 刘志春, 刘义, . 近接基坑工程有限土体失稳模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 266-277.
[7] 刘志春, 马博, 胡指南, 张振波, 杜孔泽, . 邻近地下结构基坑主动土压力分布规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 33-41.
[8] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[9] 彭俊国, 黄宇豪. 非饱和边坡中锚托板锚固尺寸的新算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1003-1013.
[10] 张常光, 关港辉, 李海祥, 范家燊, 石晶, . 水位变化下含裂缝非饱和土挡墙的地震主动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1575-1584.
[11] 王家全, 仲文涛, 黄世斌, 唐毅, . 模块式加筋土挡墙模型试验及静动力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1435-1444.
[12] 屈畅姿, 李梦竹, 刘泽, 魏丽敏, 周详详, 曹峥, . 土工格室加筋土挡墙静载模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3424-3434.
[13] 邓波, 杨明辉, 王东星, 樊军伟, . 刚性挡墙后非饱和土破坏模式及主动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2371-2382.
[14] 陈柏吉, 肖世国, . 考虑条间剪力的刚性挡墙静力与 地震主动土压力水平条分法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2263-2276.
[15] 董建华, 吴晓磊, 师利君, 于小燕, 何鹏飞, . 多年冻土区L型挡墙水平冻胀效应计算方法与分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 879-890.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!