岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8): 2149-2156.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1829

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

静动荷载下桩网结构路基模型试验研究

邓友生,李令涛,彭程谱,李龙,刘俊聪,付云博   

  1. 西安科技大学 桩承结构研究中心,陕西 西安 710054
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-31 修回日期:2022-03-03 出版日期:2022-08-11 发布日期:2022-08-17
  • 作者简介:邓友生,男,1969年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事基础工程及工程结构防灾减灾工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51878554, No. 41672308);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划重点项目(No. 2018JZ5012)。

Model tests on geogrid reinforced pile supported embankment under static and dynamic loads

DENG You-sheng, LI Ling-tao, PENG Cheng-pu, LI Long, LIU Jun-cong, FU Yun-bo   

  1. Plie-supported Structures Research & Test Center, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China
  • Received:2021-10-31 Revised:2022-03-03 Online:2022-08-11 Published:2022-08-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878554,41672308) and the Key Projects of Shaanxi Natural Science Basic Research Plan (2018JZ5012).

摘要: 通过室内模型试验测试了桩网结构路基各部分在动静两种荷载下的桩-土应力、格栅拉力,研究了土拱效应的发展演化机制以及土工格栅拉膜效应的发展特点。试验结果表明:桩-土应力以及格栅拉力的分布都是路基横截面方向上大于其纵向延伸方向,这与路基的梯形截面设计相关;空间土拱效应要强于平面土拱效应,空间土拱效应的极限状态出现在桩-土应力比为3.8时,平面土拱效应的极限状态出现在桩-土应力比为2.2时;动荷载下土拱效应较静载有一定的衰减,且静载下土拱效应越强的部位在动载的下衰减程度越大,桩间土压力随振次的发展趋势类似N型,与桩顶土压力的变化趋势正好相反。

关键词: 桩网结构路基, 土拱效应, 土工格栅, 静动荷载

Abstract: The pile-soil stress and grid tensile force of each part of the geogrid reinforced pile supported embankment were detected through laboratory model tests under both dynamic and static loads, and the development and evolution mechanism of soil arching effect and the development characteristics of geogrid stretching effect were studied. The test results show that the distributions of pile-soil stress and grid tension are greater in the transverse direction of the subgrade than that in longitudinal extension direction, which is related to the design of the trapezoidal section of the subgrade; the spatial soil arching effect is stronger than the planar soil arching effect, and the limit state of the spatial soil arching effect when the pile-soil stress ratio is 3.8, the limit state of the plane soil arching effect appears when the pile-soil stress ratio is 2.2; the soil arching effect under dynamic load has a certain extent attenuation comapated with under static load, position with stronger soil arching effect under static load has a greater attenuation degree under dynamic load, the development trend of the soil pressure between the piles with the vibration frequency is similar to the N-type, which is exactly the opposite of the change trend of the soil pressure on the top of the pile.

Key words: geogrid reinforced pile supported embankment, soil arching effect, geogrid, static and dynamic loads

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 芮瑞, LIN A H, 杨俊超, 杨硕, . 被动活动门试验中的土拱效应演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1657-1666.
[2] 孙珊珊, 贾世文, 梁忠旭, 刘墨林, 张常光. 基于填土荷载传递二项式分布模式的沟埋式涵洞竖向土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1501-1510.
[3] 王洪涛, 刘容利, 赵晓东, 赵耀辉, 赵万里, . 钢管桩-灌注桩复合支护下桩间土拱力学效应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1228-1239.
[4] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[5] 姚嘉楠, 徐长节, 迟民良, 王艳萍, 习跃来, 王伟锋, 冯国辉, 孙佳政, . RBT模式下刚性挡墙非极限主动土压力的离散元模拟及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 640-652.
[6] 陕耀, 董雅丞, 张旭辉, 姚西平, . 双层地下连续墙土压力的现场实测研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 507-516.
[7] 蒋明杰, 李泽懿, 吉恩跃, 刘宇菠, 梅国雄, . 考虑级配影响的粗粒土−格栅最优网格尺寸试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2565-2572.
[8] 蔡永明, 王志杰, 齐逸飞, 杨广庆, 王贺, . 土工格栅加筋橡胶碎石动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 87-96.
[9] 崔新壮, 姜鹏, 王艺霖, 金青, 陈璐, . 高摩阻超静定土工格栅在粗粒土夹层中的剪胀作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 141-152.
[10] 骆赵刚, 丁选明, 欧强, 蒋春勇, 方华强, . 土工格栅加筋珊瑚砂的强度及变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1053-1064.
[11] 王丽艳, 吉文炜, 陶云翔, 唐跃, 王炳辉, 蔡晓光, 张雷, . 格栅条带式加筋废旧轮胎胎面挡土墙 抗震性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 931-940.
[12] 王家全, 陈家明, 林志南, 唐毅, . 基于三角形滑移面的地基松动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 697-707.
[13] 钟卫, 张 帅, 贺拿. 基于相对变形方法的桩后土拱模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 315-326.
[14] 戴天毅, 肖世国, . 考虑路堤−加固区相互作用的刚性桩复合 地基沉降算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 479-489.
[15] AHMAD Hussein, MAHBOUBI Ahmad, NOORZAD Ali, HOSEINI Mohammad Hosein, . 包裹式土工格栅−砂土相互作用对条形基础承载 力−沉降特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2550-2567.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!