岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S2): 104-116.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0849

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

三向地震作用下叠交隧道地震响应振动台试验研究

胡垚1,雷华阳1, 2, 3,雷峥1,刘英男1   

  1. 1. 天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300350;2. 天津大学 滨海土木工程结构与安全教育部重点实验室,天津 300350; 3. 天津大学 中国地震局地震工程综合模拟与城乡抗震韧性重点实验室,天津 300350
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-07 修回日期:2022-07-21 出版日期:2022-10-10 发布日期:2022-10-03
  • 通讯作者: 雷华阳,女,1974年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土与地下工程等方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail: leihuayang74@163.com E-mail: hyjiaoliu@163.com
  • 作者简介:胡垚,男,1994年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩土与地下工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    土木工程防灾国家重点实验室开发基金(No.SLDRCE17-01);国家重点研发计划项目(No.2017YFC0805402)。

Shaking table test on seismic response of stacked tunnels under three-directional earthquake wave excitation

HU Yao1, LEI Hua-yang1, 2, 3, LEI Zheng1, LIU Ying-nan1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering Simulation and Seismic Resilience of China Earthquake Administration, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
  • Received:2021-06-07 Revised:2022-07-21 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-03
  • Supported by:
    The work was supported by the Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering (SLDRCE17-01) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0805402).

摘要: 叠交隧道是涉及隧道之间、隧道与土体相互作用的复杂体系,其安全性将严重影响城市轨道交通建设。目前,对于叠交隧道振动台试验的研究集中在水平平行和交叉叠交隧道、单向和双向地震动输入。鉴于此,利用自行设计的层状三向剪切模型箱,对竖直平行叠交隧道开展三向地震作用下的振动台模型试验,研究地基土−叠交隧道模型体系动力特性、地基土加速度、叠交隧道加速度、地表沉降、地基土孔压、叠交隧道动土压力及叠交隧道应变等地震响应。结果表明:随着震波峰值加速度(peak ground acceleration,简称PGA)依次增加,地基土−叠交隧道模型体系的自振频率随之减小,而阻尼比随之增大;叠交隧道周围地基土加速度和孔压的梯度差随着地震波PGA的增大而增大,且上隧道周围梯度差比下隧道更大;地基土对加速度的放大效应随着地震波PGA的增大而减弱;相同地震波作用下,相同位置处的叠交隧道加速度傅里叶谱形状相似,但幅值随着地震波PGA的增大而增大。此外,与顶部和底部位置相比,腰部位置加速度傅里叶谱频段范围变宽,幅值峰值有所降低;地表沉降峰值随着地震波PGA的增大而减小,相比地基土两侧位置,中心位置的沉降峰值明显较小;地震波的类型对叠交隧道动土压力峰值和应变峰值影响较小;对于动土压力峰值,两隧道的最大值均为腰部,而上、下隧道的最小值分别为底部、顶部;对于应变峰值,上隧道在腰部明显大于顶部和底部,而下隧道在4个位置相差不大。

关键词: 振动台试验, 叠交隧道, 地震响应, 三向地震

Abstract: Stacked tunnels is a complex system involving the interaction between tunnels and between tunnel and soil, and its safety will seriously affect the construction of urban rail transit. At present, the research on shaking table test of stacked tunnels focuses on horizontal parallel and cross arrangements, unidirectional and bidirectional ground motion input. This paper uses a self-designed three-dimensional laminar shear soil container to implement a shaking table model test on seismic response of vertical parallel stacked tunnels under three-directional earthquake wave excitation. Its seismic response includes the dynamic characteristics of foundation soil-stacked tunnels model system, the acceleration of foundation soil and stacked tunnels, ground settlement, the pore pressure of foundation soil, and the dynamic soil pressure and the strain of stacked tunnels. The results show that with the increase of seismic wave peak ground acceleration (PGA), the natural frequency of foundation soil-stacked tunnels model system decreases and the damping ratio increases. The gradient difference of soil acceleration and pore pressure around the stacked tunnels increases with the increase of seismic wave PGA, and the gradient difference around the upper tunnel is larger than that around the lower tunnel. The amplification effect of the foundation soil on the acceleration decreases with the increase of the seismic wave PGA. Under the action of same seismic wave, the shape of the acceleration Fourier spectrum of stacked tunnels at the same position is similar, but the amplitude increases with the increase of the seismic wave PGA. Furthermore, compared with the crown and bottom positions, the frequency range of the acceleration Fourier spectrum at the waist position becomes wider, and the peak amplitude decreases. The peak value of ground settlement decreases with the increase of seismic wave PGA, and the peak value of ground settlement in the center is obviously smaller than that on both sides of the foundation soil. The type of seismic wave has little effect on the peak value of dynamic earth pressure and strain of stacked tunnels. For the peak dynamic earth pressure, in the upper tunnel, the maximum value of the two tunnels is at the waist position, while the minimum value of upper and lower tunnels is at the bottom and crown positions, respectively. The peak strains at the both waist positions in the upper tunnel are significantly larger than those at the top and bottom positions, while the peak strain does not differ much at the four positions in lower tunnel.

Key words: shaking table test, stacked tunnels, seismic response, three-directional earthquake wave excitation

中图分类号: U451
[1] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[2] 杨景泉, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 竖向入射P波激励下饱和土中管桩地震响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[3] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[4] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[5] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[6] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[7] 周桓竹, 刘圣安, 李斌, 陈炜昀, 苏雷, 郑俊杰, 郑烨炜, . 穿越变化地层的沉管隧道接头地震响应的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 289-298.
[8] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[9] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[10] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 潘申鑫, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 地震作用下桩板墙-锚索组合支护基覆型边坡的动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[11] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[12] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 陈虹羽, 郭玉丰, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 基于变形的降雨后地震基覆型边坡劣化特性与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1789-1802.
[13] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[14] 陶志刚, 丰于翔, 赵易, 张晓宇, 何满潮, 雷啸天, . 穿断层隧道NPR锚索支护体系抗震特性振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[15] 王通, 刘先峰, 袁胜洋, 蒋关鲁, 胡金山, 邵珠杰, 田士军, . 顺倾及反倾层状碎裂结构斜坡地震反应的大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 489-501.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!