岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 3261-3271.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1862

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

深海超软土动剪切模量与阻尼比特性研究

王奕霖1,李飒1,段贵娟2,李怀亮3,赵福臣3   

  1. 1. 天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300072;2. 中国电建集团华东勘测设计研究院有限公司,浙江 杭州 311122; 3. 海洋石油工程股份有限公司,天津 300461
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-29 接受日期:2023-03-15 出版日期:2023-11-28 发布日期:2023-11-29
  • 通讯作者: 李飒,女,1970年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事海洋土的工程性质、海洋工程等方面的研究与教学工作。E-mail: lisa@tju.edu.cn E-mail:wangyl9902@163.com
  • 作者简介:王奕霖,男,1999年生,硕士研究生,主要从事海洋土性质和土动力学方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 42072294)

Dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of deep-sea ultra-soft soil

WANG Yi-lin1, LI Sa1, DUAN Gui-juan2, LI Huai-liang3, ZHAO Fu-chen3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 2. Power China Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311100, China; 3. Offshore Oil Engineering Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300452, China
  • Received:2022-11-29 Accepted:2023-03-15 Online:2023-11-28 Published:2023-11-29
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation Project (42072294).

摘要:

海底表层的结构物在使用中可能受到动荷载作用,为保证其的长期稳定性,有必要对海床表层的深海超软土动力学特性展开研究。使用Anton Paar MCR302流变仪,采用应变控制模式,对含水率高于液限的深海超软土进行动态剪切测试,研究动态流变参数、动剪切模量G和阻尼比l的变化规律。结果表明,随着剪切应变的增大,深海超软土的变形由可恢复的弹性变形主导逐渐过渡为不可恢复的黏性变形主导。通过建立动态流变参数与动剪切模量G和阻尼比l的关系,探讨了深海超软土的动力特性。根据深海超软土动剪切模量G的变化特征,提出了峰值参考应变的概念,建立了最大动剪模量Gmax与归一化含水率w/wpw为含水率,wp为塑性含水率)的关系。结果还显示,相较于常规黏土,深海超软土的G/Gmax-γγ 为剪切应变)曲线衰减较快,且受塑性指数影响较小。深海超软土的阻尼比整体偏高,并随剪切应变的增大快速上升。根据试验结果,给出描述深海超软土G/Gmax-γλ-γ 曲线的数学模型。

关键词: 深海超软土, 流变仪, 动态流变参数, 动剪切模量, 阻尼比, 含水率

Abstract:

Seabed surface structures may be subjected to dynamic loads. In order to ensure the long-term stability of them, it is crucial to study the dynamic characteristics of deep-sea ultra-soft soil at seabed surface. Oscillatory shear tests were carried out on deep-sea ultra-soft soil with water content beyond liquid limit by an Anton Paar MCR302 rheometer with strain control mode. The variations of dynamic rheological parameters, dynamic shear modulus G and damping ratio l were studied. The test results showed that with the increase of shear strain, the deformation of deep-sea ultra-soft soil was dominated by recoverable elastic deformation and gradually transited to unrecoverable viscous deformation. By establishing the relationship between dynamic rheological parameters and dynamic shear modulus G and damping ratio l, the dynamic characteristics of deep-sea ultra-soft soil were discussed. According to the features of dynamic shear modulus G of deep-sea ultra-soft soil, the concept of peak reference strain was proposed, and the relationship between maximum dynamic shear modulus Gmax and normalized water content w/wp (w is the moisture content, wp is plastic moisture content) was established. Compared with conventional clay, the G/Gmax-γ (γ is shear strain)curve of deep-sea ultra-soft soil decreased faster and was less affected by plasticity index. The damping ratio of deep-sea ultra-soft soil was generally high, and increased rapidly with the increase of shear strain. Based on the experimental results, models suitable for describing G/Gmax-γand λ-γ curves of deep-sea ultra-soft soil were proposed.

Key words: deep-sea ultra-soft soil, rheometer, dynamic rheological parameters, dynamic shear modulus, damping ratio, water content

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 王勇, 顾凯, 张博, 姜霖, 施斌, . 基于分布式温度测试和重建的浅表土体含水率反演[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 531-540.
[2] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[3] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[4] 李新明, 何永飞, 谈云志, 任克彬, 张先伟, 尹松, . 不同含水率下石灰−偏高岭土改良遗址土宏微观特性的冻融循环效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2894-2906.
[5] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 刘欣宇, 李亚博. 含水率和剪切速率对黏性滑带土剪切行为及损伤演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2471-2482.
[6] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[7] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[8] 姜海波, 卢燕, 李琳, 张军, . 干湿-冻融作用输水渠道膨胀土强度特性及损伤演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1356-1367.
[9] 罗宣兵, 李清林, 陈文娟, 杨潇飞, 张美雪, . 不同含水率-冻结温度-骆驼刺根系含量下砂土冻融变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1174-1186.
[10] 杨艳霜, 闫磊, 张占荣, 刘永莉, 崔臻, 彭剑承, 亢兆鹏, . 基于三相孔隙介质模型的地震动传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1109-1121.
[11] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
[12] 许庆钊, 史文豹, 常聚才, 苗壮, 闫澳运, 李传明, 齐潮. 不同加载速率含水煤样力学响应及宏微观破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 881-893.
[13] 郭旭辉, 朱鸿鹄, 吴冰, 高宇新, 胡乐乐, 曹鼎峰, . 基于人工神经网络的黄土含水率光纤被动感测技术研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 653-664.
[14] 刘璐, 李帅学, 张鑫磊, 高洪梅, 王志华, 肖杨. 微生物加固珊瑚砂动剪切模量与阻尼比特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3410-3420.
[15] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!