岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 2657-2666.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1638

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

地震历史对各深度土体抗液化性影响的振动台试验研究

王晓磊1,刘理腾1,刘润2,刘历波1,董林1,任海1   

  1. 1. 河北工程大学 土木工程学院,河北 邯郸 056038;2. 天津大学 岩土工程研究所,天津 300072
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-20 接受日期:2022-12-30 出版日期:2023-09-11 发布日期:2023-09-02
  • 通讯作者: 刘理腾,男,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事地基与基础工程的研究。E-mail: 591572102@qq.com E-mail: wangsanshi2003@163.com
  • 作者简介:王晓磊,男,1983年生,博士,副教授,主要从事地基与基础工程的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金联合重点基金(No.U21A20164);国家杰出青年科学基金(No.51825904);国家自然科学基金项目(No.51708525)。

Shaking table test study on the influence of seismic history on liquefaction resistance of soils at different depths

WANG Xiao-lei1, LIU Li-teng1, LIU Run2, LIU Li-bo1, DONG Lin1, REN Hai1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, Hebei 056038, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • Received:2022-10-20 Accepted:2022-12-30 Online:2023-09-11 Published:2023-09-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21A20164), the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (51825904) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51708525).

摘要: 地震引起的液化会对岩土结构造成重大破坏,而震后伴随的余震可能导致砂土再次发生液化。为研究自由场地下地震历史对各深度饱和砂土的抗液化能力的影响,设计并开展了一系列振动台试验。试验中对砂土输入了4次不同加速度的震动事件,细分为7次小的事件。通过计算对比每次振动事件的超静孔压比、加速度响应以及土体沉降,以研究不同地震历史下各深度土体抗液化能力的变化规律。试验结果表明:输入的地震波加速度大小与加速度响应系数呈正相关关系;饱和砂土遭受轻微和中等地震时液化更容易发生在浅层而非表层;表层土体中,强烈地震后的中等余震使得土体对地震烈度的敏感性降低,孔隙水压力在峰值加速度后消散迅速,液化时间缩短;有强震历史的土体会降低浅层土体的抗液化性能,深层土体抗液化性反而会在经历强地震后增强,影响深度范围取决于地震的烈度;通过数据拟合得到了不同等级的循环地震在各深度土体的抗液化提升比的量化公式。试验结果可以反映在地震实际中各等级的地震历史对各深度土体的不同影响。

关键词: 地震历史, 砂土液化, 抗液化性能, 超静孔隙水压力, 振动台试验

Abstract: Earthquake-induced liquefaction can cause significant damage to geotechnical structures, and the aftershocks accompanying the earthquakes may cause the sandy soils to liquefy again. To investigate the effect of free-field subsurface seismic history on the liquefaction resistance of saturated sandy soils at various depths, a series of shaking table tests was designed and conducted. Four shaking events with different accelerations, subdivided into seven smaller events, were input to the sandy soil in the tests. The excess pore pressure ratio, acceleration response, and soil settlement were calculated and compared for each vibration event to investigate the variation laws of soil liquefaction resistance at various depths under different seismic histories. The test results show that the magnitude of the input seismic wave acceleration is positively correlated with the acceleration response coefficient. Liquefaction of saturated sandy soils subjected to minor and moderate earthquakes is more likely to occur at shallow rather than superficial layers. In superficial soils, moderate aftershocks after strong earthquakes make the soils less sensitive to seismic intensity, pore water pressure dissipates rapidly after peak acceleration, and liquefaction time is shortened. Soils with strong seismic histories reduce the liquefaction resistance of shallow soils, while the liquefaction resistance of deep soils is enhanced after strong earthquakes, and the affected depth range depends on the earthquake intensity. Quantitative formula of the liquefaction-resistant lifting ratio of soil at different depths under different levels of cyclic earthquakes is obtained through data fitting. The test results can reflect the different effects of different seismic histories on the soils at various depths in the actual earthquake.

Key words: seismic history, sand soil liquefaction, liquefaction resistance, excess pore water pressure, shaking table test

中图分类号: TU411.93
[1] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[2] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[3] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[4] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[5] 王彪, 陈星欣, 尹清锋, 郭力群, 何明高, . 软土地层盾构地中对接法孔压扰动规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 535-549.
[6] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[7] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[8] 许文昊, 王志华, 申志福, 高洪梅, 刘殷强, 张鑫磊, . 基于CFD-DEM方法的饱和砂土场地液化模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2492-2501.
[9] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[10] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[11] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 潘申鑫, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 地震作用下桩板墙-锚索组合支护基覆型边坡的动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[12] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[13] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 陈虹羽, 郭玉丰, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 基于变形的降雨后地震基覆型边坡劣化特性与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1789-1802.
[14] 李金宇, 王伟, 王浩宇, 杨研科, 徐凯放, 张晓庆, 熊文. 地震序列作用下液化场地条件影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1551-1559.
[15] 陶志刚, 丰于翔, 赵易, 张晓宇, 何满潮, 雷啸天, . 穿断层隧道NPR锚索支护体系抗震特性振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!