岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 3461-3480.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0014

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

砂土SHPB冲击试验与数值模拟研究进展及问题探讨

吴琳,吕亚茹,张申,丁思超   

  1. 河海大学 力学与工程科学学院,江苏 南京 210098
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-06 接受日期:2024-03-03 出版日期:2024-11-11 发布日期:2024-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 吕亚茹,女,1987年生,博士,教授,主要从事中高应变率土力学理论相关的科学研究。E-mail: yaru419828@163.com
  • 作者简介:吴琳,男,1997年生,博士研究生,主要从事砂土冲击特性方面的研究工作。E-mail: wulin318@hhu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 52279097,No. 51779264);江苏高校“青蓝工程”资助。

Research progress and discussion on problems of sandy soil SHPB impact tests and numerical simulations

WU Lin, LYU Ya-ru, ZHANG Shen, DING Si-chao,   

  1. College of Mechanics and Engineering Science, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China
  • Received:2024-02-06 Accepted:2024-03-03 Online:2024-11-11 Published:2024-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (52279097, 51779264) and the Jiangsu Province “Qing Lan Project”.

摘要: 中高应变率下砂土的动力特性对防护工程、桩基贯入、船舶抛锚、飞机降落等问题具有重要意义。综述了砂土霍普金森压杆(split Hopkinson pressure bar,简称SHPB)冲击试验及数值模拟研究现状,总结了目前砂土冲击特性研究存在的主要问题,归纳如下:(1) SHPB试验对于散体材料仍存在不确定性,如试样尺寸尚不规范统一、边界条件难以控制、三轴试验方法还不成熟等,未来三轴SHPB试验需要解决试样径向变形测量和围压恒定问题;(2) 由于试验条件下排气和排水不确定,且存在惯性效应,导致应变率效应无法准确判断;(3) 含水率对冲击特性的影响与孔隙水压力、孔隙气压力变化相关,但相关变量测量困难,结果难以分析,需要开发完全不排气、不排水的装置以消除边界条件影响;(4) 现有方法如有限元法、离散元法、耦合方法无法统一模拟波传播连续性和颗粒破碎,需要克服计算量限制,建立考虑复杂机制(如含水、颗粒破碎)的数值模型来研究砂土冲击特性;(5) 需要建立考虑应变率效应的本构模型,实现水分、颗粒破碎等复杂机制的模拟,完善中高应变率土力学理论框架。

关键词: 砂土, 霍普金森压杆, 冲击试验, 动力特性, 应变率效应

Abstract: Dynamic properties of sandy soil under medium-high strain rates are of great significance for protection engineering, pile penetration, ship anchoring, aircraft landing, and so on. This paper reviews the current research status of split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) impact tests and numerical simulations on sandy soil. The key issues in the research of sandy soil impact characteristics are summarized as follows: (1) The SHPB test still faces uncertainties for granular materials, such as the lack of standardized test sample size, difficulties in controlling boundary conditions, and the immaturity of triaxial testing methods. Future triaxial SHPB tests need to address issues related to measuring radial deformation of the samples and maintaining consistent confining pressure. (2) Due to uncertainties in gas and water discharge under test conditions and the presence of inertial effects, the accurate determination of strain rate effects becomes challenging. (3) The impact characteristics of granular materials are influenced by moisture content, which is correlated with changes in pore water pressure and pore air pressure. However, measuring these related variables is difficult, making it challenging to analyze the results. It is necessary to develop a device that completely eliminates the effects of gas and water discharge to mitigate the influence of boundary conditions. (4) To study the impact characteristics of sandy soils, it is necessary to overcome computational limitations and establish numerical models that account for complex mechanisms such as water content and particle fragmentation. Existing methods such as the finite element method, discrete element method, and coupled methods are unable to uniformly simulate the continuity of wave propagation and particle fragmentation. (5) It is crucial to develop constitutive models that consider the strain rate effects and can simulate complex mechanisms such as water content and particle fragmentation. This will help refine the theoretical framework of soil mechanics at medium to high strain rates.

Key words: sand, split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB), dynamic tests, dynamic properties, strain rate effect

中图分类号: O 347.3
[1] 王宁博, 姚仰平, 刘林, 李翔宇, 毛安琪, 李宁, . 考虑围压效应的砂土统一硬化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 297-308.
[2] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 黄明, 李熹, . 基于Kozeny-Carman方程的酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀固化砂土的渗流数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
[3] 范猛, 李敬军, 杨正权, 刘小生, 朱凯斌, 赵剑明, . 基于标准贯入试验的液化判别方法对深埋砂土适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[4] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[5] 富海鹰, 钟雨薇, 王孝文, 吴博涵, 袁冉, . 基于次加载面理论的砂土临界状态参数模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1788-1798.
[6] 罗宣兵, 李清林, 陈文娟, 杨潇飞, 张美雪, . 不同含水率-冻结温度-骆驼刺根系含量下砂土冻融变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1174-1186.
[7] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[8] 金磊, 李晶晶, 李新明, 孙翰卿, . 柔性边界的有限差分法−离散元法模拟及其对砂土三轴固结排水和不排水剪切特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 980-990.
[9] 王滢, 刘嘉怡, 高盟, 孔祥霄, . 地震作用下深海含气能源土动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 457-466.
[10] 邵国建, 毛泽辉, 苏宇宸, 焦泓程, 吕亚茹. 钙质砂透射系数探究:波形耦合作用及梯度提升预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3661-3672.
[11] 耿潇威, 陈成, 孙中华, 黎伟, 王勇, 徐梦冰, 余颂, . 基于广义位势理论的考虑组构各向异性的砂土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3175-3186.
[12] 杜金飞, 杜宇翔, 贾永胜, 孙金山, 姚颖康, 谢全民, 范焜晖, . 水−动力耦合作用下红砂岩变形破坏与能耗分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 248-258.
[13] 任富强, 谷金泽, 孙博, 常远, . 含不同孔洞类岩石材料的动力响应机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 654-664.
[14] 许文昊, 王志华, 申志福, 高洪梅, 刘殷强, 张鑫磊, . 基于CFD-DEM方法的饱和砂土场地液化模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2492-2501.
[15] 王智德, 钱梦凡, 李杰, 司莹莹, 江俐敏, . 高应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1917-1928.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!