岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 1039-1048.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0741CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0741

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

层理铁矿石剪切力学性能试验研究

汪昕1, 2,幸安康1, 2,曾子强1, 2,姜祎1, 2,徐建宇1, 2,王晓南3,刘造保1, 2   

  1. 1.东北大学 深部金属矿山安全开采教育部重点实验室,辽宁 沈阳 110819;2.东北大学 深部工程与智能技术研究院,辽宁 沈阳 110819; 3.本溪龙新矿业有限公司,辽宁 本溪 117013
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-14 接受日期:2024-09-12 出版日期:2025-04-11 发布日期:2025-04-11
  • 通讯作者: 幸安康,男,1999年生,硕士研究生,主要从事金属矿山地下开采方面的研究。E-mail: xingankang1999@163.com
  • 作者简介:汪昕,男,1986年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事深部矿山岩体力学方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail: wangx@mail.neu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No. 2023YFC2907201);辽宁省科学技术计划(No. 2023JH1/10400004);国家自然科学基金(No. 52374083)。

Experiment of shear mechanical properties of layered iron ore

WANG Xin1, 2, XING An-kang1, 2, ZENG Zi-qiang1, 2, JIANG Yi1, 2, XU Jian-yu1, 2, WANG Xiao-nan3, LIU Zao-bao1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education on Safe Mining of Deep Metal Mines, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110819, China; 2. Institute of Deep Engineering and Intelligent Technology, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110819, China; 3. Benxi Longxin Mining Co., Ltd., Benxi, Liaoning 117013, China
  • Received:2024-06-14 Accepted:2024-09-12 Online:2025-04-11 Published:2025-04-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFC2907201), the Science and Technology Program of Liaoning Province (2023JH1/10400004) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52374083).

摘要: 陡倾薄层状矿体在开挖扰动下,易呈现高切向应力导致边墙弯折破断或弯曲内鼓破坏,破坏模式与层理岩体的力学性质紧密相关。为研究思山岭铁矿层状矿体在剪切破坏过程中的变形和强度性质及破坏特征,开展不同层理倾角和围压下层状岩石三轴剪切试验。试验结果表明:思山岭层理铁矿石试样的峰值强度、轴向和环向变形、破坏模式受围压和层状节理角度影响显著。层理角度的增加使得试样抗剪强度呈现先增加后减小的趋势,轴向变形和环向变形呈现波浪形变化;围压的增加使得试样峰值剪切强度有显著的提高,轴向剪切位移也有增加的趋势,环向变形呈减小的趋势。层理铁矿石试样的破坏模式受层理倾角和围压控制,在层理倾角为0°和30°时,试样发生以应力控制型为主的破坏;层理倾角为45°时,试样发生应力-结构控制型的破坏;层理倾角为60°和90°时,试样发生以结构控制型为主的破坏。最后基于试验结果,给出了同时考虑中主应力和矿石层理倾角的破坏判据,研究结果可为思山岭铁矿的采场和支护设计提供重要支撑。

关键词: 层理倾角, 围压, 强度, 变形, 破坏模式

Abstract: Steeply dipping thin-layered ore bodies are prone to exhibit failure modes such as bending and breaking of the sidewall or bending and internal bulging caused by high tangential stress, which are closely related to the mechanical properties of the bedded rock mass. In order to investigate the deformation, strength properties, and failure characteristics of Sishanling layered iron ore during the shear failure process, conventional triaxial shear tests were conducted on layered rocks under various bedding dip angles and confining pressures. The test results show that the peak strength, axial displacement, circumferential deformation and failure mode of stratified iron ore samples are affected by confining pressure and layered joint angle. With an increase in the bedding angle, the shear strength of the specimen initially increases and then decreases, while the axial and circumferential deformations exhibit a ‘wave-like’ trend. Moreover, as the confining pressure increases, the peak shear strength of the specimen significantly improves, the axial shear displacement increases, and the circumferential deformation decreases. In addition, failure mode of bedding iron ore specimen is controlled by both the bedding dip angle and confining pressure. The study reveals that the failure mode is stress-controlled when the bedding dip angles are 0° and 30°. At a bedding dip angle of 45°, the specimens exhibit a stress-structure controlled failure mode, while for angles at 60° and 90°, the failure mode is predominantly controlled by the structure. Based on the test results, a failure criterion is proposed considering both the intermedium principle stress and the ore bedding angle. The test results could offer important technique support for the stope and blasting and also the ground support design.

Key words: bedding dip angle, confining pressure, strength, deformation, failure mode

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 付强, 杨科, 刘钦节, 宋涛涛, 吴犇牛, 于鹏, . 交变荷载下围岩−衬砌组合结构界面强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 40-52.
[2] 王江锋, 吴涵兵, 赵顺利, 杜春雪, 张淼, . 考虑压密变形的某输水隧洞红砂岩加卸载力学演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 121-130.
[3] 吴俊, 闵一凡, 征西遥, 韩晨, 牛富俊, 朱宝林, . 地质聚合物固化淤泥法制备再生细骨料的压缩变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 159-170.
[4] 宋义敏, 王腾腾, 许海亮, 安栋, 蒋孝东. 岩石变形局部化和破裂前兆的应变信息识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 171-182.
[5] 杨烜宇, 王勇, . 考虑不同凸起体宽度的规则形态土−岩界面剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[6] 吴倩婵, 章荣军, 徐志豪, 杨钊, 郑俊杰, . 絮凝剂对固化流泥强度行为及变形特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 205-216.
[7] 王宁博, 姚仰平, 刘林, 李翔宇, 毛安琪, 李宁, . 考虑围压效应的砂土统一硬化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 297-308.
[8] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 张廷彪, 刘德军, 黎良仆, . 考虑围岩−盾体−注浆体−管片相互作用的深埋护盾式隧道掘进机法隧道围岩压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 366-376.
[9] 孙红林, 李巍, 汪莹鹤, 黄国良, 廖昕, 黄亮, . 高铁无砟轨道路基上拱变形原因及防治对策研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 389-402.
[10] 李槟, 申海萌, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 不同围压条件下花岗岩剪切过程渗透率动态演化规律数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 437-453.
[11] 聂耀武, 胡兵, 顾雷雨, 李槟, 周全超, 李文辉, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 二氧化碳地质封存协同上覆煤矿开采的安全风险评估数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 491-506.
[12] 王想君, 李英明, 赵光明, 孟祥瑞, 范朝涛, 付强, . 围岩变形作用下考虑杆体屈服和锚固界面滑移的全长锚固锚杆力学解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2687-2702.
[13] 周雄雄, 黄佳铄, 李若婷, 张建余, . 堆石料湿化变形的修正剑桥模型及其参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2703-2710.
[14] 黄德昕, 温韬, 陈宁生, . 考虑能量演化的岩石残余强度确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2825-2836.
[15] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!