岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 1657-1666.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1067CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1067

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

被动活动门试验中的土拱效应演化规律

芮瑞1,LIN A H1,杨俊超2,杨硕1   

  1. 1. 武汉理工大学 土木工程与建筑学院,湖北 武汉 430070;2. 广州市第一市政工程有限公司,广东 广州 510060
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-29 接受日期:2024-11-25 出版日期:2025-06-11 发布日期:2025-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 杨俊超,男,1990年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程与结构工程加固的相关研究工作。E-mail: yjcresearch@163.com
  • 作者简介:芮瑞,男,1981年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程加固与地基处理技术的研究与教学工作。E-mail: r.rui@whut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.42272315)

Evolution of soil arching in passive trapdoor tests

RUI Rui1, LIN A H1, YANG Jun-chao2, YANG Shuo1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; 2. Guangzhou First Municipal Engineering Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China
  • Received:2024-08-29 Accepted:2024-11-25 Online:2025-06-11 Published:2025-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42272315).

摘要: 土拱效应广泛存在于岩土工程中,通常采用活动门试验进行研究。传统的活动门试验较少关注隧道抗浮、锚板拉拔等被动活动门的工况。有鉴于此,研发了伺服升降的阵列式活动门试验装置,采用密实砂土作为填料开展了平面应变被动活动门试验,采集了活动门上升过程中的全阵列竖向荷载变化以及断面位移,得到了被动土拱效应演化的荷载−位移反应曲线。试验结果表明:随着填料高度增加,荷载重分布更加明显,最大土拱率、极限土拱率及对应的归一化位移量均增大。断面位移与滑移面呈喇叭口形向填料表面发展,剪应变集中分布在活动门两侧形成显著的弧形滑移面,滑移面底部与竖直方向夹角接近于0º,并随路堤高程增加而增大。当填土高度较高时,随着活动门上升量的增加,外侧滑移面的内部发展出新的滑移面。依据实测得到的剪切带与垂直方向的夹角,得到了修正的极限平衡法计算公式,计算出的最大土拱率与试验结果较为相符。

关键词: 活动门试验, 隧道抗浮, 土拱效应, 剪切带, 土拱率

Abstract: The arching effect is widely observed in geotechnical engineering and is typically studied using trapdoor tests. Traditional trapdoor tests ignore the conditions of passive trapdoors, such as tunnel uplift and anchor plate pullout. To address this gap, a servo-controlled lifting array-type trapdoor test apparatus was developed. A plane strain passive trapdoor test was conducted using dense sand as the backfill material. During the lifting process of trapdoor, the vertical load variations across the entire array and sectional displacements were collected, resulting in load-displacement response curve for the evolution of passive arching effect. The test results show that as the backfill height increases, load redistribution becomes more pronounced. This is evidenced by increases in the maximum arching ratio, ultimate arching ratio, and corresponding normalized displacement. Sectional displacements and sliding surfaces develop towards the backfill surface in a “funnel” shape. Shear strain concentrates on both sides of the trapdoor, forming a significant curved sliding surface. The angle between the sliding surface and the vertical direction is close to 0º at the base and increases with the embankment elevation. When the fill height is greater, new sliding surfaces develop inside the outer sliding surface as the trapdoor continues to rise. A modified limit equilibrium method calculation formula was derived based on the measured angles between the shear band and the vertical direction. The calculated maximum arching ratio closely matches the experimental results.

Key words: trapdoor test, tunnel uplift resistance, soil arching effect, shear band, soil arching ratio

中图分类号: TU415
[1] 孙珊珊, 贾世文, 梁忠旭, 刘墨林, 张常光. 基于填土荷载传递二项式分布模式的沟埋式涵洞竖向土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1501-1510.
[2] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[3] 王洪涛, 刘容利, 赵晓东, 赵耀辉, 赵万里, . 钢管桩-灌注桩复合支护下桩间土拱力学效应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1228-1239.
[4] 姚嘉楠, 徐长节, 迟民良, 王艳萍, 习跃来, 王伟锋, 冯国辉, 孙佳政, . RBT模式下刚性挡墙非极限主动土压力的离散元模拟及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 640-652.
[5] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[6] 刘宗祺, 陈曦, 崔柳生, 唐建彬. 直剪和双轴离散元数值试验中剪切带宽度的孔隙率场测量技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 742-750.
[7] 陕耀, 董雅丞, 张旭辉, 姚西平, . 双层地下连续墙土压力的现场实测研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 507-516.
[8] 叶帅华, 辛亮亮, . 基于桩-土界面剪切特性的单桩沉降和承载问题研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1457-1471.
[9] 李泽闯, 张昊, 程培峰, 王艳丽, . 含粗粒滑带土剪切带演化及空间展布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1067-1080.
[10] 高志傲, 孔令伟, 王双娇, 刘炳恒, 芦剑锋, . 平面应变条件下不同裂隙方向原状膨胀土变形破坏性状与剪切带演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2495-2508.
[11] 刘飞禹, 李昊泽, 符军, 孙宏磊, . 橡胶砂级配对混合土体剪切特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 663-672.
[12] 王家全, 陈家明, 林志南, 唐毅, . 基于三角形滑移面的地基松动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 697-707.
[13] 赵凯, 邵帅, 邵生俊, 魏军政, 张少英, 张玉. 平面应变下原状黄土的剪切带研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 433-441.
[14] 黎澄生, 孔令伟, 舒荣军, 刘智军, 张炳鑫, . 花岗岩残积土剪切带上的细观结构损伤规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3203-3212.
[15] 钟卫, 张 帅, 贺拿. 基于相对变形方法的桩后土拱模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 315-326.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!